VTechWorks
VTechWorks provides global access to Virginia Tech scholarship, including journal articles, books, theses, dissertations, conference papers, slide presentations, technical reports, working papers, administrative documents, videos, images, and more by faculty, students, and staff. Faculty can deposit items to VTechWorks from Elements, including journal articles covered by the University open access policy. Email vtechworks@vt.edu for help.
Open Access Policy
Virginia Tech's open access policy enables researchers to deposit the accepted version of scholarly articles with no embargo.
Theses and Dissertations
Virginia Tech was first in the world to require ETDs in 1997, and continues to add scans of older theses and dissertations.
Open Textbooks
More than 50 freely available and openly licensed textbooks are among our most downloaded items.
Communities in VTechWorks
Select a community to browse its collections.
Recent Submissions
Family and Friend Support, Strain, and Loneliness Among Dementia Caregivers in Rural Appalachia
Stanfill-Carrillo, Brenda Liana (Virginia Tech, 2026-02-04)
Background: Loneliness, defined as a perceived deficit in the quantity or quality of social relationships, is associated with a range of adverse physical and mental health outcomes. Understanding contributors to loneliness among caregivers of people living with dementia (PLwD) is therefore an important public health concern. Family caregivers, particularly spouses or adult children, report higher levels of loneliness compared to non-caregivers and some other caregiver groups. This vulnerability may stem from time constraints on social activities, misunderstandings within existing relationships regarding care management, and losses in shared experiences as dementia progresses. Across the life course, family and friends serve as important sources of social support and relational connection, both of which may be associated with lower loneliness.
Research Questions and hypotheses: Guided by Perlman and Peplau’s definition of loneliness and the Stress Process Model, this thesis examined whether perceived support and strain from caregivers’ family and friends are associated with loneliness among spousal and adult child caregivers of PLwD living in rural Appalachia, above and beyond caregiving demands. Caregiver relationships with the PLwD (wife, husband, daughter, son) were examined categorically to account for differences in relational roles and expectations. It was hypothesized that (1) caregiver relationship type would be associated with loneliness, with wives reporting the highest levels, and (2) greater family strain would be associated with higher loneliness, whereas greater family and friend support would be associated with lower loneliness.
Methodology: Data were drawn from the Families in Appalachia Caring for Elders with Alzheimer’s Disease (FACES) study (N = 141). A three-step hierarchical multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to examine associations between caregiver relationship type, perceived family and friend support, perceived family and friend strain, and loneliness, controlling for unsupervised time and assistance with personal activities of daily living.
Results: Wives reported higher levels of loneliness than husbands, daughters, and sons. After accounting for caregiving demands and relationship type, higher perceived family strain was associated with higher loneliness, whereas greater perceived friend support was associated with lower loneliness. Family support and friend strain were not significantly associated with loneliness in the final model.
Implications: Findings suggest that perceived relationship quality, rather than the mere presence or number of social ties, is central to understanding loneliness among caregivers of PLwD in rural Appalachia. While friend support was associated with lower loneliness, addressing familial strain in caregiver interventions and psychosocial programming may be particularly relevant for efforts aimed at reducing caregiver loneliness.
A Qualitative Exploration of School-Based Intervention Needs Among Rural Appalachian Youth
Winograd, Dayna Gael (Virginia Tech, 2025-12-05)
Disordered eating is prevalent in the United States, with over 20% of children and adolescents reporting some form of disordered eating. Eating disorders are associated with detrimental physical effects and co-occurring mental health difficulties. One population that appears to be at high risk for developing disordered eating symptoms is rural youth. Unfortunately, rural youth often do not receive treatment for their disordered eating symptoms due to myriad care barriers, including geographical restrictions and financial constraints. School-based interventions offer promise to address such barriers and increase access to treatment among this vulnerable group. This study represents a first step at identifying rural youth needs and formatting preferences for a school-based intervention. Participants were 11 rural adolescents (Mage = 15.09) from Appalachia. Participants reported their demographic characteristics in surveys and completed a semi-structured interview assessing their needs and formatting preferences for a school-based intervention for disordered eating. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis; the following themes emerged. Rural youth reported that an intervention should promote healthy and balanced eating, teach social media literacy, and discuss external factors and overlapping mental health difficulties, and de-emphasize the value of weight and shape. Rural youth also suggested that the intervention design take into consideration logistical and cultural factors of rural communities. These data suggest that rural youth’s treatment preferences align with existing school-based interventions for disordered eating. However, modifications may be needed to address logistical and cultural factors that may impact acceptability and feasibility of school-based eating disorder interventions in rural communities
Library Committee: December 12, 1983
(Virginia Tech, 1983-12-12)
Library Committee: March 17, 2020
(Virginia Tech, 2020-03-17)
Library Committee: March 23, 2020
(Virginia Tech, 2020-03-23)