Virginia Tech
    • Log in
    View Item 
    •   VTechWorks Home
    • College of Agriculture and Life Sciences (CALS)
    • Department of Food Science and Technology
    • Scholarly Works, Department of Food Science and Technology
    • View Item
    •   VTechWorks Home
    • College of Agriculture and Life Sciences (CALS)
    • Department of Food Science and Technology
    • Scholarly Works, Department of Food Science and Technology
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Comparison of analytical methods for prediction of prefermentation nutritional status of grape juice

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Main article (45.96Kb)
    Downloads: 1145
    Date
    2002
    Author
    Gump, B. H.
    Zoecklein, B. W.
    Fugelsang, K. C.
    Whiton, R. S.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Five methods for evaluating nitrogen status were compared using 70 Cabernet Sauvignon juice samples: nitrogen by o-phthaldialdehyde (NOPA), arginine NOPA, enzymatic ammonia, Formol, and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Parallel recovery studies using model solutions of various amino acids and ammonia, presented singly and in combination, were also conducted. The results from two fruit-processing methods were compared using immature and mature berries. NOPA measurements were significantly higher in mature, pressed whole berry-derived samples, compared with homogenized juice. Adjustment of formaldehyde pH prior to analysis was found to be critical to consistency of the Formol method. Average amino acid recoveries for the Formol titration ranged from 82 to 99%. Average recovery for proline was 16.9 +/- 0.4%. Ammonium nitrogen was also recovered (84 +/- 3%) in the Formol procedure. Formol results trended significantly with NOPA. The correlation coefficient between Formol and NOPA plus NH4+ was 0.87, with Formol values being higher. The average deviation between the Formol and HPLC plus NH4+ and between the NOPA plus NH4+ and HPLC plus NH4+ was 7.3%.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10919/49450
    Collections
    • Scholarly Works, Department of Food Science and Technology [128]

    If you believe that any material in VTechWorks should be removed, please see our policy and procedure for Requesting that Material be Amended or Removed. All takedown requests will be promptly acknowledged and investigated.

    Virginia Tech | University Libraries | Contact Us
     

     

    VTechWorks

    AboutPoliciesHelp

    Browse

    All of VTechWorksCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Log inRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    If you believe that any material in VTechWorks should be removed, please see our policy and procedure for Requesting that Material be Amended or Removed. All takedown requests will be promptly acknowledged and investigated.

    Virginia Tech | University Libraries | Contact Us