Virginia Tech
    • Log in
    View Item 
    •   VTechWorks Home
    • ETDs: Virginia Tech Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • Masters Theses
    • View Item
    •   VTechWorks Home
    • ETDs: Virginia Tech Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • Masters Theses
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Nonlinear Deadbeat Current Control of a Switched Reluctance Motor

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    etd-12052009-001630_Rudolph_BD_T_2009.pdf (1.733Mb)
    Downloads: 467
    Date
    2009-12-04
    Author
    Rudolph, Benjamin
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    High performance current control is critical to the success of the switched reluctance motor (SRM). Yet high motor phase nonlinearities in the SRM place extra burden on the current controller, rendering it the weakest link in SRM control. In contrast to linear motor control techniques that respond to current error, the deadbeat controller calculates the control voltage by the current command, phase current, rotor position and applied phase voltage. The deadbeat controller has demonstrated superior response in three-phase inverter current control, PM motor current control, and other relatively linear control applications. This study will investigate the viability and performance of a deadbeat controller for the highly nonlinear SRM. The need for an accurate deadbeat control model first motivates the investigation of experimental inductance measurement techniques. A deadbeat control law is then proposed through multiple revisions to demonstrate the benefit of the numerical method chosen to derive the controller and a current predictor that accounts for processor latency and PWM delay. The practical problems of loop delay, feedback noise, feedback filtering, and deadbeat controller parameter sensitivity are investigated by linear analysis, simulation, experimental implementation and nonlinear model analysis. Simulation and implementation verify deadbeat performance and various measures of transient performance are presented. To address the problem of SRM model error the study ends with a brief discussion of adaptive deadbeat control modifications for possible future research.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10919/76898
    Collections
    • Masters Theses [19685]

    If you believe that any material in VTechWorks should be removed, please see our policy and procedure for Requesting that Material be Amended or Removed. All takedown requests will be promptly acknowledged and investigated.

    Virginia Tech | University Libraries | Contact Us
     

     

    VTechWorks

    AboutPoliciesHelp

    Browse

    All of VTechWorksCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Log inRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    If you believe that any material in VTechWorks should be removed, please see our policy and procedure for Requesting that Material be Amended or Removed. All takedown requests will be promptly acknowledged and investigated.

    Virginia Tech | University Libraries | Contact Us