Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNovikova, Olgaen
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-26T18:35:06Zen
dc.date.available2019-02-26T18:35:06Zen
dc.date.issued2019-02-26en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/87785en
dc.description.abstractThis study revisits the issue of accuracy in contemporary hotel valuation. The valuation results are compared to the market values of these firms to assess which technique provides the most robust and supportable estimate. Research results reveal that, at least for the analyzed sample, the discounted cash flow (DCF) technique provides the most realistic estimate of a hotel firm’s value. Results also show that the valuation estimate of AVM is significantly different from both Band of Investment methods. As such, the process of valuing hotel properties is better understood.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 3.0 United Statesen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/en
dc.subjectreexaminationen
dc.subjecthotel valuationen
dc.subjectcash flowen
dc.subjecthotel industryen
dc.titleA Reexamination of Current Hotel Valuation Techniques – Which Approach is More Realistic? [Summary]en
dc.typeSummaryen
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States
License: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States