Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNeurauter, Lukeen
dc.contributor.authorRoan, Michaelen
dc.contributor.authorSong, Miaoen
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Martyen
dc.contributor.authorGlenn, Ericen
dc.contributor.authorWalters, Jacoben
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-10T15:48:15Zen
dc.date.available2020-04-10T15:48:15Zen
dc.date.issued2020-04-10en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/97586en
dc.description.abstractMany auto manufacturers are now producing hybrid and electric vehicles with an additive noise component to signal vehicle presence in the same way that internal combustion engine vehicles signal their presence through engine noise. The Virginia Tech Transportation Institute conducted an evaluation of quiet car detectability as part of a GM-funded project in 2015–2016. The internal combustion engine benchmark significantly outperformed the other three vehicles under a 10-km/h steady approach, but these differences largely disappeared at 20 km/h due to increased tire and road noise. Trends of improved detectability offered by the additive noise signals were observed but did not demonstrate a significant advantage over an electric vehicle with no additional noise component. Since that original project, NHTSA has released their final version of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 141, outlining “Minimum Sound Requirements for Hybrid and Electric Vehicles.” This project aimed to demonstrate differences in detectability by replicating the previous study but with newer FMVSS 141-compliant sounds. The proposed additive sounds examined drastically improved detectability compared to the production variants included in the first round of testing. At 10 km/h, the additive sound conditions outperformed the no-sound condition by magnitudes ranging from 3.4 to 4.6, each eliciting mean detection distances well above the NHTSA minimum detection criteria. At 20 km/h, detectability also improved dramatically over the earlier production variants, achieving a similar magnitude advantage over no-sound as observed at 10 km/h. Increasing background noise resulted in a measurable impact on mean detection distances. The average reduction across all conditions was approximately 33% and 28% for approach speeds of 10 km/h and 20 km/h, respectively. In terms of accurately recognizing a stopped vehicle in a 20 to 0 km/h scenario, all sound conditions significantly outperformed the no-sound condition across both background noise conditions.en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherNational Surface Transportation Safety Center for Excellenceen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNSTSCE;20-UT-078en
dc.rightsCreative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/en
dc.subjecttransportation safetyen
dc.subjectelectric vehiclesen
dc.subjecthybrid vehiclesen
dc.subjectpedestrian and bicyclist safetyen
dc.subjectFederal Motor Vehicle Safety Standardsen
dc.subjectautomotive human factorsen
dc.titleQuiet Car Detectability: Impact of Artificial Noise on Ability of Pedestrians to Safely Detect Approaching Electric Vehiclesen
dc.typeReporten


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication
License: Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication