A comprehensive approach to preventing errors in a hospital setting: Organizational behavior management and patient safety

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorCunningham, Thomas Raymonden
dc.contributor.committeechairGeller, E. Scotten
dc.contributor.committeememberFinney, Jack W.en
dc.contributor.committeememberJones, Russell T.en
dc.contributor.committeememberFoti, Roseanne J.en
dc.contributor.departmentPsychologyen
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T20:07:42Zen
dc.date.adate2009-03-30en
dc.date.available2014-03-14T20:07:42Zen
dc.date.issued2009-02-05en
dc.date.rdate2012-11-20en
dc.date.sdate2009-02-22en
dc.description.abstractEstimates of the number of U.S. deaths each year resulting from medical errors range from 44,000 (Institute of Medicine, 1999) to 195,000 (HealthGrades, 2004). Additionally, instances of medical harm are estimated to occur at a rate of approximately 15 million per year in the U.S., or about 40,000 per day (Institute for Healthcare Improvement, 2007). Although several organizational behavior management (OBM) intervention techniques have been used to improve particular behaviors related to patient safety, there remains a lack of patient-safety-focused behavioral interventions among healthcare workers. OBM interventions are often applied to needs already identified within an organization, and the means by which these needs are determined vary across applications. The current research addresses gaps in the literature by applying a broad needs-assessment methodology to identify patient-safety intervention targets in a hospital and then translating OBM intervention techniques to identify and improve the prevention potential of responses to reported medical errors. A content analysis of 17 months of descriptions of follow-up actions to error reports for nine types of the most-frequently-occurring errors was conducted. Follow-up actions were coded according to a taxonomy of behavioral intervention components, with accompanying prevention scores based on criteria developed by Geller et al. (1990). Two error types were selected for intervention; based on the highest frequency of reporting and lowest average follow-up prevention score. Over a three-month intervention period, managers were instructed to respond to these two error types with active communication, group feedback, and positive reinforcement strategies. Results indicate improved prevention potential as a consequence of improved corrective action for targeted errors. Future implications for identifying and classifying responses to medical error are discussed.en
dc.description.degreePh. D.en
dc.identifier.otheretd-02222009-115040en
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-02222009-115040/en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/26279en
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.relation.haspartCunninghamDissertationfinaldraftETD2.pdfen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectPatient Safetyen
dc.subjectOrganizational Behavior Managementen
dc.subjectMedical Erroren
dc.titleA comprehensive approach to preventing errors in a hospital setting: Organizational behavior management and patient safetyen
dc.typeDissertationen
thesis.degree.disciplinePsychologyen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen
thesis.degree.namePh. D.en

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
CunninghamDissertationfinaldraftETD2.pdf
Size:
597.65 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Doctoral Dissertations