Assessing and Evaluating Recreational Trails on Public Lands

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorWimpey, Jeremy Feltonen
dc.contributor.committeechairMarion, Jeffrey L.en
dc.contributor.committeememberCarstensen, Laurence W.en
dc.contributor.committeememberLawson, Steven R.en
dc.contributor.committeememberResler, Lynn M.en
dc.contributor.committeememberHeatwole, Conrad D.en
dc.contributor.departmentForestryen
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T20:13:58Zen
dc.date.adate2009-07-21en
dc.date.available2014-03-14T20:13:58Zen
dc.date.issued2009-07-01en
dc.date.rdate2013-11-13en
dc.date.sdate2009-07-13en
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation contains two journal articles; the first article (Chapter 2) evaluates the relative influences of use, managerial and environmental factors on trail width, from a survey of all formal trails in Acadia National Park, Maine, USA. Regression analyses of trail width data focus on increasing our understanding of the relationships among visitor use, environmental and managerial factors and trail width. In particular, regression modeling was used to evaluate the relative importance of factors that influence trail width along hiking trails. ANOVA analyses demonstrate differences in trail width based on trail surface type, and the presence or absence of trail borders. A novel approach of comparing intended widths to actual widths enabled us to look specifically at the avoidable and undesirable impacts associated with having a trail that is wider than intended. Informal trails (visitor created) represent a threat to the natural resources of protected natural areas around the globe. These trails can remove vegetation, displace wildlife, alter hydrology, alter habitat, spread invasive species, and fragment landscapes. The second article (Chapter 3) examines informal and formal trails within Great Falls Park, VA, a sub-unit of the George Washington Memorial Parkway, managed by the U.S. National Park Service. This study sought to answer three specific questions: 1) Are the physical characteristics and topographic alignments of informal trails significantly different from formal trails, 2) Can landscape fragmentation metrics be used to summarize the relative impacts of formal and informal trail networks on a protected natural area?, and 3) What can we learn from examining the spatial distribution of the informal trails within protected natural areas? Statistical comparisons between formal and informal trails in this park indicate that informal trails have less sustainable topographic alignments than their formal counterparts. Spatial summaries of the lineal and areal extent and fragmentation associated with the trail networks by park management zones compare park management goals to the assessed attributes. Hotspot analyses highlight areas of high trail density within the park and findings provide insights regarding potential causes for development of dense informal trail networks.en
dc.description.degreePh. D.en
dc.identifier.otheretd-07132009-134629en
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-07132009-134629/en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/28284en
dc.publisherVirginia Techen
dc.relation.haspartDissertation_Master_JW_7_16.pdfen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjecttrailsen
dc.subjectspatial analysisen
dc.subjectAcadia National Parken
dc.subjectGeorge Washington Memorial Parkwayen
dc.subjectrecreation ecologyen
dc.subjectimpact assessmenten
dc.titleAssessing and Evaluating Recreational Trails on Public Landsen
dc.typeDissertationen
thesis.degree.disciplineForestryen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen
thesis.degree.namePh. D.en

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Dissertation_Master_JW_7_16.pdf
Size:
3.28 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Doctoral Dissertations