<front xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.0/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1.xsd"><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJECOL</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research Letters in Ecology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1687-6776</issn><issn pub-type="ppub">1687-6768</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="other">260754</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2008/260754</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">260754</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Letter</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Assessment of Nutrient Limitation in Floodplain Forests with Two Different Techniques</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" id="U26194717" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Neatrour</surname><given-names>Matthew A.</given-names></name><email>mneatrour@colgate.edu</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="I1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="U39062478"><name><surname>Jones</surname><given-names>Robert H.</given-names></name><email>rhjones@vt.edu</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="I2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="U51327846"><name><surname>Golladay</surname><given-names>Stephen W.</given-names></name><email>sgollada@jonesctr.org</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="I3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="Academic Editor" id="U75192957"><name><surname>Jose</surname><given-names>Shibu</given-names></name></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="I1"><sup>1</sup><addr-line>Department of Biology</addr-line><addr-line>Colgate University</addr-line><addr-line>Hamilton</addr-line><addr-line>NY 13346</addr-line><country>USA</country><ext-link ext-link-type="domain-name">colgate.edu</ext-link></aff><aff id="I2"><sup>2</sup><addr-line>Department of Biological Sciences</addr-line><addr-line>Virginia Tech</addr-line><addr-line>Blacksburg</addr-line><addr-line>VA 24061</addr-line><country>USA</country><ext-link ext-link-type="domain-name">vt.edu</ext-link></aff><aff id="I3"><sup>3</sup><addr-line>Joseph W. Jones Ecological Research Center</addr-line><addr-line>Box 2324</addr-line><addr-line>Route 2</addr-line><addr-line>Newton</addr-line><addr-line>GA 39870</addr-line><country>USA</country><ext-link ext-link-type="domain-name">jonesctr.org</ext-link></aff><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2008</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="archival-date"><day>15</day><month>05</month><year>2008</year></pub-date><volume>2008</volume><history><date date-type="received"><day>29</day><month>11</month><year>2007</year></date><date date-type="accepted"><day>07</day><month>04</month><year>2008</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-year>2008</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Copyright © 2008</copyright-holder><license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the <ext-link xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License</ext-link>, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>We assessed nitrogen and phosphorus limitation in a floodplain forest in southern Georgia in USA using two commonly used methods: nitrogen to phosphorus (N:P) ratios in litterfall and fertilized ingrowth cores. We measured nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) concentrations in litterfall to determine N:P mass ratios. We also installed ingrowth cores within each site containing native soil amended with nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), or nitrogen and phosphorus (N + P) fertilizers or without added fertilizer (C). Litter N:P ratios ranged from 16 to 22, suggesting P limitation. However, fertilized ingrowth cores indicated N limitation because fine-root length density was greater in cores fertilized with N or N + P than in those fertilized with P or without added fertilizer. We feel that these two methods of assessing nutrient limitation should be corroborated with fertilization trials prior to use on a wider basis.</p></abstract><counts><ref-count count="33"/><page-count count="4"/></counts></article-meta></front>
