WEBVTT

00:00:00.560 --> 00:00:05.360
Welcome to the Virtual Women and Gender in 
International Development Discussion Series.

00:00:05.360 --> 00:00:09.600
This is our third and final event for fall 
2024 and we're happy that you could all  

00:00:09.600 --> 00:00:16.600
join us virtually today for the discussion 
featuring Dr. Kalpana Giri as guest speaker.

00:00:16.600 --> 00:00:21.600
As of this morning, we had 79 
people registered for today's event.

00:00:21.600 --> 00:00:25.600
Besides lots of students, faculty 
and staff from Virginia Tech that  

00:00:25.600 --> 00:00:28.120
include people from many different countries,

00:00:28.120 --> 00:00:32.000
We have folks joining us from 
other US universities UT Austin,  

00:00:32.000 --> 00:00:34.840
Princeton University and other universities across  

00:00:34.840 --> 00:00:39.200
the world including Carleton University 
in Canada and Vinh University in Vietnam

00:00:39.200 --> 00:00:44.240
and we have several universities in 
the US including the Borlaug Institute  

00:00:44.240 --> 00:00:50.120
for International Agriculture, USAID and 
then we have World Resources Institute,  

00:00:50.120 --> 00:00:52.640
Forest action Nepal, Institute of Forestry

00:00:53.320 --> 00:00:58.960
and more folks from Nepal, Great Britain, Vietnam, 
Uganda and Canada and maybe more this morning.

00:01:01.160 --> 00:01:04.680
Welcome to all of you. Please note that our event  

00:01:04.680 --> 00:01:09.720
will be recorded and available on our 
website later so for all participants.

00:01:09.720 --> 00:01:13.480
By staying on, you're consenting 
to being recorded. You can turn  

00:01:13.480 --> 00:01:17.760
your camera off if you don't 
want your image to be recorded.

00:01:17.760 --> 00:01:22.080
So before introducing our speaker, 
I invite you to reflect on Virginia  

00:01:22.080 --> 00:01:27.000
Tech's land and labor recognition. I 
will read you a summary of that and  

00:01:27.000 --> 00:01:33.120
Pratirakshya is going to put the link to the 
full statement on the Virginia Tech website.

00:01:33.120 --> 00:01:37.280
Virginia Tech acknowledges that we live 
and work on the Tutelo / Monacan People’s  

00:01:37.280 --> 00:01:43.480
homeland, and we recognize their continued 
relationships with their lands and waterways.

00:01:43.480 --> 00:01:48.920
We further acknowledge that the Morrill 
Land-Grant College Act (1862) enabled  

00:01:48.920 --> 00:01:54.040
the commonwealth of Virginia to finance and 
found Virginia Tech through the forced removal  

00:01:54.040 --> 00:01:58.800
of Native Nations from their lands in 
California and other areas in the West.

00:01:58.800 --> 00:02:03.360
We also recognize that enslaved Black 
people generated revenue and resources  

00:02:03.360 --> 00:02:09.520
used to establish Virginia Tech and were 
prohibited from attending until 1953.

00:02:09.520 --> 00:02:15.040
Through InclusiveVT, the institutional 
and individual commitment to Ut Prosim  

00:02:15.040 --> 00:02:19.080
(that I may serve) in the spirit of 
community, diversity, and excellence,  

00:02:19.080 --> 00:02:28.120
we commit to advancing a more diverse, 
equitable, and inclusive community.

00:02:28.120 --> 00:02:33.480
Some brief housekeeping notes. This talk will last 
approximately 45 minutes. Our speaker presentation  

00:02:33.480 --> 00:02:39.680
will be about 20-25 minutes followed by about 20 
minutes of discussion and Q&A with the audience.

00:02:39.680 --> 00:02:45.200
So all participants will be muted to enable the 
speaker to present without interruption as always.

00:02:45.200 --> 00:02:47.880
In order for our discussion 
to be as rich as it can be,  

00:02:47.880 --> 00:02:53.240
we need everyone to be respectful and treat all 
participants with kindness and consideration  

00:02:53.240 --> 00:02:58.560
without discriminatory behavior. So if anyone is 
disrespectful including interrupting a speaker  

00:02:58.560 --> 00:03:03.080
or bringing an off topic issues, we will 
have to remove them from the zoom meeting.

00:03:03.080 --> 00:03:07.360
You can post your questions at 
any time during this discussion  

00:03:07.360 --> 00:03:13.520
in the chat box and we will read 
those after our presentation or

00:03:14.760 --> 00:03:17.720
You can actually raise your hand and ask to read  

00:03:17.720 --> 00:03:21.680
your question yourself. But 
we do want to maintain order.

00:03:30.200 --> 00:03:32.960
So anyway, after the speaker's presentation,  

00:03:32.960 --> 00:03:36.000
you can raise your hands 
through the virtual buttons and

00:03:36.000 --> 00:03:41.560
Pratirakshya will tell you how to do that. We'll 
ask you to unmute yourself to talk directly.

00:03:41.560 --> 00:03:47.440
So this is called a discussion series. It's not 
just a lecture. So we really encourage people

00:03:48.160 --> 00:03:53.520
to communicate verbally as well as in writing. 
But if you're shy, I'm happy to read it for you.

00:03:53.520 --> 00:03:56.720
Or if your internet connection 
is not good. Sometimes that's  

00:03:56.720 --> 00:03:59.160
the reason that I will read them for you.

00:03:59.160 --> 00:04:01.520
So again, the webinar is being recorded. That  

00:04:01.520 --> 00:04:05.720
also means you'll have access 
to it later via our website.

00:04:05.720 --> 00:04:09.400
Now, if you'd like to enable captions, 
at the bottom of your Zoom screen you  

00:04:09.400 --> 00:04:15.400
can find the option more, select it, and then 
select show captions and then select English.

00:04:25.800 --> 00:04:30.000
In advance, I'd like you at the end 
when Pratirakshya puts the link in  

00:04:30.000 --> 00:04:32.040
for the survey, please do fill out the survey.

00:04:32.040 --> 00:04:38.200
It really helps us to get 
feedback for planning and funding.

00:04:38.200 --> 00:04:42.120
Now I know what you really want to see 
here, Kalpana Giri. So let me introduce her.

00:04:42.120 --> 00:04:47.000
She is a senior manager in the World 
Resources Institute and works to expand  

00:04:47.000 --> 00:04:54.320
WRI's ambitions on social equity by research 
and gender and equity integrated programming.

00:04:54.320 --> 00:04:59.160
Kalpana is a trained forester and has 
demonstrated experience in mainstreaming  

00:04:59.160 --> 00:05:04.760
gender and social equity considerations in 
technical sectors, programming with a focus  

00:05:04.760 --> 00:05:14.960
on forestry, clean energy, REDD+, climate 
adaptation, FLEGT and restoration topics.

00:05:14.960 --> 00:05:24.800
Prior to joining WRI, she worked 
with RECOFTC where she managed  

00:05:24.800 --> 00:05:27.720
the direction and portfolio of equity integration.

00:05:27.720 --> 00:05:32.160
She designed and implemented a regional 
waves leadership program in partnership  

00:05:32.160 --> 00:05:35.880
with sectoral ministries, private 
sector women and indigenous groups

00:05:35.880 --> 00:05:40.280
to promote transformative solutions 
for the environment and people across  

00:05:40.280 --> 00:05:43.400
forestry and climate change policies and plans.

00:05:43.400 --> 00:05:49.160
She's a thought leader on topics of gender and 
social equity in forestry and climate change.

00:05:49.160 --> 00:05:55.160
and advises several international organizations to 
strengthen their gender strategies and portfolio.

00:05:55.160 --> 00:05:59.960
So Kalpana holds a PhD in forest science 
from the University of Natural Resources  

00:05:59.960 --> 00:06:04.000
and Applied Life Sciences in Vienna, Austria.

00:06:04.000 --> 00:06:09.000
Her direct experience of working with diverse 
stakeholders, including marginalized actors,  

00:06:09.000 --> 00:06:13.040
have made her more aware of the 
acute need and usefulness of

00:06:13.040 --> 00:06:18.960
plural knowledge systems held by marginalized 
actors in addressing major environmental issues.

00:06:18.960 --> 00:06:23.680
Drawing on insights from the Global Restoration 
Initiative led by World Resources Institute,  

00:06:23.680 --> 00:06:28.760
today she will shed light on ways in 
which gender and social equity approaches

00:06:28.760 --> 00:06:31.320
are implemented in restoration practice  

00:06:31.320 --> 00:06:35.280
and discuss its implications for 
navigating the complex interplay

00:06:35.280 --> 00:06:41.080
of restoration, climate change, and social 
justice through development practice.

00:06:41.080 --> 00:06:44.960
So the title of her talk is Beyond 
the Critiques and Ambitions of  

00:06:44.960 --> 00:06:50.720
Equity Mainstreaming in restoration practice: 
lessons from the Global Restoration Initiative

00:06:50.720 --> 00:06:55.240
Now I'm going to mute myself. And I'm 
going to share my screen. So Kalpana,  

00:06:55.240 --> 00:06:56.920
you'll have to just tell me next, okay?

00:06:56.920 --> 00:06:59.520
Okay, sounds good. Thank you.

00:07:09.720 --> 00:07:15.040
All right. Thank you so much, Marie 
Elisa Christie. Hello, everyone. Namaste.

00:07:15.040 --> 00:07:20.440
I'm very pleased to be in this space. Once again, 
thanks to Mary Elisa Christie for inviting me to  

00:07:20.440 --> 00:07:24.800
this space and also to Virginia Tech 
University for holding this space.

00:07:24.800 --> 00:07:28.440
Today, I'll be sharing some 
insights of doing equity in  

00:07:28.440 --> 00:07:31.600
restoration practice within 
the nexus of climate change.

00:07:31.600 --> 00:07:35.920
But before I do that, I would also 
like to share some context so you  

00:07:35.920 --> 00:07:38.560
understand where my knowledge 
and insights are coming from.

00:07:46.040 --> 00:07:49.400
So I think I'm drawing my insights 
from my lived experience, you know,  

00:07:49.400 --> 00:07:55.000
as a university trained forester 
as well as my work experience.

00:07:55.000 --> 00:07:59.000
I'm trained as a forest engineer 
and forest is my major degree.

00:07:59.000 --> 00:08:02.240
However, I started to observe 
some disconnect between the  

00:08:02.240 --> 00:08:07.920
first curricula and the practice. And 
that made me curious to learn more.

00:08:07.920 --> 00:08:11.720
So I ended up reading, learning, and more,  

00:08:11.720 --> 00:08:16.640
I connected to the right networks and mentors 
that talked about sociology of forests.

00:08:16.640 --> 00:08:20.520
And eventually I ended up doing a PhD in forestry.

00:08:22.000 --> 00:08:25.720
For my PhD, I examine the topics 
of forest governance from a wider  

00:08:27.200 --> 00:08:31.920
sociological lens that also included 
gender and governance perspective.

00:08:31.920 --> 00:08:38.000
So this combined knowledge of technical and 
social sciences has really helped me tremendously.

00:08:38.520 --> 00:08:44.400
First, I think it really expanded my abilities 
to better understand environmental problems and  

00:08:44.400 --> 00:08:50.280
create impactful solutions that really
work for the people on the ground.

00:08:50.280 --> 00:08:55.320
Second, I also think that this knowledge 
also expanded my abilities and it also  

00:08:55.320 --> 00:08:59.600
expanded better and more job choices for me.

00:08:59.600 --> 00:09:03.480
And last but not least, it really 
gave me a choice to choose the  

00:09:03.480 --> 00:09:07.280
type of organization and the type of 
work that I really want to engage.

00:09:07.280 --> 00:09:10.200
Because I want my work to be 
meaningful and create some impacts.

00:09:11.800 --> 00:09:15.520
Having those abilities really puts me 
in a space where I'm choosing the jobs  

00:09:15.520 --> 00:09:18.360
and the organization that I want to work with.

00:09:18.360 --> 00:09:20.600
And that's really a privilege.

00:09:21.280 --> 00:09:25.560
So today I will share some of 
these practical examples of how  

00:09:25.560 --> 00:09:28.880
equity mainstreaming or gender 
and social equity mainstreaming

00:09:28.880 --> 00:09:31.560
actually is done in practice. And to do that,  

00:09:31.560 --> 00:09:36.240
I'll give a snapshot of my current 
work at the World Resource Institute.

00:09:40.360 --> 00:09:46.600
So I think for many of you, if you don't know 
World Resource Institute, or in short, WRI,

00:09:46.600 --> 00:09:49.520
It's a nonprofit organization that tackles global  

00:09:49.520 --> 00:09:52.800
environmental issues affecting 
nature, people, and the climate.

00:09:52.800 --> 00:09:55.640
It works on multiple different 
environmental topics ranging  

00:09:55.640 --> 00:09:59.400
from land, food, water, ocean, and cities.

00:09:59.400 --> 00:10:04.440
Forests and land degradation and 
deforestation is one key topic.

00:10:04.440 --> 00:10:10.040
Within WRA, I'm part of an initiative that 
is called Global Restoration Initiative.

00:10:10.040 --> 00:10:15.760
This initiative aims to restore millions 
of hectares of deforested and degraded land  

00:10:15.760 --> 00:10:21.840
across three geographies globally, 
in Asia, Africa, and Latin America.

00:10:21.840 --> 00:10:27.160
It works with 52 countries and in partnership 
with almost 500 partners on the ground,  

00:10:27.160 --> 00:10:31.160
including government, business, 
and communities around the world.

00:10:31.160 --> 00:10:37.040
I lead and manage the equity integration 
work of Global Restoration Initiative.

00:10:37.040 --> 00:10:42.880
Just to add a bit of context here on what 
restoration really implies, restoration efforts  

00:10:44.320 --> 00:10:51.680
are extremely essential to the global efforts of 
reversing land degradation and climate change.

00:10:52.200 --> 00:10:56.800
It is important also to ensure 
that people who actually heavily  

00:10:56.800 --> 00:11:00.400
depend on these resources are 
also not left behind and they

00:11:00.400 --> 00:11:04.840
improve their resilience through the 
efforts that we put true restoration.

00:11:04.840 --> 00:11:09.880
And restoration is often used as an umbrella 
term that revolves around land degradation.

00:11:10.480 --> 00:11:14.760
But it involves a lot of technical 
interventions such as agroforestry,  

00:11:14.760 --> 00:11:18.120
reforestation, silver pasture, water management,  

00:11:18.120 --> 00:11:22.280
assisted natural regeneration, tree 
planting, and so on and so forth, right?

00:11:22.280 --> 00:11:30.680
So for some of you are really focusing on 
foresty is a major, I think know that a bunch of

00:11:30.680 --> 00:11:37.360
different interventions are actually clubbed under 
restoration as a potential major of interventions.

00:11:37.360 --> 00:11:42.840
Restoration is also chosen because it 
offers the potential to deliver solutions

00:11:42.840 --> 00:11:47.440
that are on ground that are also cost 
effective and that are multiple in nature,

00:11:47.440 --> 00:11:52.800
multiple in the sense that it can generate 
environmental, social, and economical solutions.

00:11:52.800 --> 00:11:55.480
As such, there is an increasing commitment,  

00:11:55.480 --> 00:12:01.280
pledges and ambitions being set to 
implement restoration solutions.

00:12:01.280 --> 00:12:06.520
Initiatives like AFRO 100, which stands for the 
African Forest Landscape Restoration Initiative,  

00:12:06.520 --> 00:12:09.960
and the 2020 initiative are an example of that.

00:12:09.960 --> 00:12:13.920
Both AFR100 and 2020 initiatives 
are country-led efforts.

00:12:13.920 --> 00:12:18.480
But they aim to implement 100 millions of actors,  

00:12:18.480 --> 00:12:23.120
100 million hectares of land in 
Africa under restoration by 2030.

00:12:23.120 --> 00:12:25.160
And 50 million hectares of degraded land  

00:12:25.160 --> 00:12:29.160
into conservation and restoration 
in Latin America and Caribbean.

00:12:33.400 --> 00:12:39.360
And I think despite this place is an ambition, we 
also need to understand that the progress is slow.

00:12:39.360 --> 00:12:43.720
And there are certain critics that surround 
whether restoration is really equitable or not.

00:12:43.720 --> 00:12:47.000
If you really look around the 
literature and condense the major 

00:12:47.000 --> 00:12:51.120
patterns that are coming out of the study, 
studies shows two distinct patterns.

00:12:51.120 --> 00:12:57.040
First inequities are scalar to restoration 
and that means that they persist across  

00:12:57.040 --> 00:13:00.400
all level of restoration, whether 
it's at the agenda setting level

00:13:00.400 --> 00:13:06.000
to implementation to including different 
plural knowledge systems or representing  

00:13:06.000 --> 00:13:11.320
different needs and priorities of different 
actors, also the marginalized communities.

00:13:11.320 --> 00:13:17.920
Second, despite the call for 
reforms on equity implementation.

00:13:17.920 --> 00:13:21.800
The dominant practice or the dominant 
ways through which gender and social  

00:13:21.800 --> 00:13:26.200
equity mainstreaming is usually applied 
across environmental organizations,  

00:13:26.200 --> 00:13:30.040
including in climate change practice
has highly remained problematic.

00:13:30.040 --> 00:13:34.040
They show a trend where equity 
aspects remain highly superficial,  

00:13:34.040 --> 00:13:38.400
often done just to tick the box 
and to match the funding request.

00:13:38.400 --> 00:13:41.520
But by doing so, they often 
create a space where equity  

00:13:41.520 --> 00:13:44.920
specs are depoliticized, they become devalued.

00:13:44.920 --> 00:13:48.360
And remain inadequately accounted within project  

00:13:48.360 --> 00:13:54.920
designs and outcomes. And this really leads 
to limited outcomes for social change.

00:13:54.920 --> 00:13:59.240
So if we really combine these two patterns, 
then it really looks like a very serious issue,  

00:13:59.240 --> 00:14:01.640
right? And what can we really do around that?

00:14:01.640 --> 00:14:05.720
The question then becomes, how can 
we really do equity implementation  

00:14:05.720 --> 00:14:10.040
right in restoration programs 
and what would enable that?

00:14:10.040 --> 00:14:15.480
So today I really invite you to learn, 
discuss and consider how we can do that.

00:14:15.480 --> 00:14:18.840
I would like to share with you two 
examples from the Global Restoration  

00:14:18.840 --> 00:14:26.040
Initiative where I and a lot of champions 
from my team engage in this process and

00:14:26.040 --> 00:14:29.160
supported equity implementation 
within those two programs.

00:14:29.160 --> 00:14:34.480
The first program, the first example 
is about Terra Fund for AFR100 program.

00:14:37.440 --> 00:14:43.280
So Terra Fund for AFR100 program is basically 
terra fund is a fund. It's a blended finance fund.

00:14:43.280 --> 00:14:48.640
It aims to incentivize restoration on the 
ground through finance, data, and partnerships.

00:14:48.640 --> 00:14:55.080
It supports implementation of restoration solution 
across Africa, including in three key landscapes.

00:14:55.080 --> 00:15:00.520
The Great Rift Valley in Kenya, Lake Kivu, and 
the Rasuji Basin, and the Ghana Cocoa Belt.

00:15:01.400 --> 00:15:06.200
WRI's role in this space is that WRI 
co-creates the design and delivery  

00:15:06.200 --> 00:15:09.640
with the partners through a 
platform called Terra Match.

00:15:09.640 --> 00:15:12.120
It offers funding, data, platform,  

00:15:12.120 --> 00:15:16.480
policy, and equity support to the 
partners to implement restoration.

00:15:32.040 --> 00:15:37.160
So TerraFund is basically a blended finance 
fund. And why TerraFund was important is because

00:15:37.160 --> 00:15:41.120
Some of the money, the traditional 
pocket of money or funding that  

00:15:41.120 --> 00:15:45.320
goes into restoration and climate 
change, it is very less and limited.

00:15:45.320 --> 00:15:51.760
A lot of dependency alone will actually 
create a dependency syndrome of countries

00:15:51.760 --> 00:15:56.120
Always looking out for money so can 
the money be used in a way that it  

00:15:56.120 --> 00:16:00.120
can really incentivize the economy that 
is based on restoration on the ground.

00:16:00.120 --> 00:16:02.040
And that was the vision that Terrafund took.

00:16:02.560 --> 00:16:05.720
In order to do that, it really 
wants to mobilize private finance  

00:16:05.720 --> 00:16:09.560
to support restoration economies on the ground.

00:16:09.560 --> 00:16:13.920
And it wants to do it in a way that it 
remains locally relevant, equitable,  

00:16:13.920 --> 00:16:16.880
and that it provides secure jobs and livelihoods

00:16:16.880 --> 00:16:21.760
to the communities we actually do restoration 
on the ground. And to do that, for now,  

00:16:21.760 --> 00:16:25.280
what it does is that it provides 
targeted funding, direct funding  

00:16:25.280 --> 00:16:32.280
to profit and nonprofit organizations that 
undertake restoration projects in Africa.

00:16:32.280 --> 00:16:37.720
And these restoration projects grow trees, 
restore land, and generate social impacts.

00:16:37.720 --> 00:16:41.000
The demand for this program 
is huge. We have received,  

00:16:41.000 --> 00:16:44.920
we launched this program since September 2021.

00:16:44.920 --> 00:16:50.560
And until now, we have received 
almost more than 3,000 application  

00:16:50.560 --> 00:16:55.480
and we're able to fund only 198 
projects in 27 countries in Africa.

00:16:55.480 --> 00:17:02.120
And we have dispersed 32 million to support 
restoration implementation on the ground.

00:17:05.360 --> 00:17:18.120
So how does equity really come into 
integration within a fund like terra fund?

00:17:18.120 --> 00:17:24.080
So the process of equity integration or 
implementation in Terrafund really begin with.

00:17:24.080 --> 00:17:26.400
I think me working with the team,  

00:17:26.400 --> 00:17:30.320
understanding the nature of their program, 
what the program really wants to deliver.

00:17:30.320 --> 00:17:34.960
And then bringing some of my social 
skills to conduct the social gender  

00:17:34.960 --> 00:17:40.440
and social data analysis and finding some 
really key gaps and priorities and then

00:17:40.440 --> 00:17:45.040
throwing that back to the bigger 
team for discussion and deliberation.

00:17:45.040 --> 00:17:48.080
Here, in addition to the data 
sharing and deliberation,  

00:17:48.080 --> 00:17:52.480
what really happened is I think I was 
also able to translate some of the

00:17:53.120 --> 00:17:56.800
equity data and concepts around 
gender and social equity,  

00:17:56.800 --> 00:18:02.240
gender gaps, rights and power dynamics 
within the concept of running a fund.

00:18:02.240 --> 00:18:05.920
What does that really look like 
to the fund in very simple terms?

00:18:05.920 --> 00:18:12.120
In simple terms, equity efforts 
were really placed in two areas.

00:18:12.120 --> 00:18:14.160
The first area is at the funding label because  

00:18:14.160 --> 00:18:16.720
terra fund is essentially a 
fund. It disperses the funds.

00:18:17.280 --> 00:18:23.520
The first step is to really examine whether or 
not Terra Fund is able to disperse this funding  

00:18:23.520 --> 00:18:28.240
to the groups that actually face more 
constraint barriers to access funding.

00:18:28.240 --> 00:18:31.960
So when we did that research, we 
find that especially woman-led  

00:18:31.960 --> 00:18:37.360
and youth-led enterprises often face much 
more constant barriers to access funding.

00:18:37.360 --> 00:18:41.720
Therefore, we prioritize them 
in our funding allocations.

00:18:41.720 --> 00:18:47.000
Second, restoration ultimately wants 
to incentivize local economies,  

00:18:47.000 --> 00:18:49.400
local jobs and livelihoods at the ground.

00:18:49.400 --> 00:18:53.640
And therefore, it is important that 
we really position people as a key  

00:18:53.640 --> 00:18:58.200
element within restoration 
practice. This means that  

00:18:58.920 --> 00:19:04.640
restoration projects generate benefits such 
as jobs, livelihoods, trainings, networks.

00:19:04.640 --> 00:19:10.360
and more, and that these benefits 
also go and reach to disadvantaged  

00:19:10.360 --> 00:19:14.800
groups within those communities 
at the local level, such as

00:19:14.800 --> 00:19:20.720
to smallholder farmers, women, youth, 
indigenous communities, and so on and so forth.

00:19:20.720 --> 00:19:24.600
So with these ideas, we solidified 
these goals. We really created some  

00:19:24.600 --> 00:19:27.720
specific criteria into the waiting criteria.

00:19:27.720 --> 00:19:31.640
We evaluated project application 
based on those criteria. We selected  

00:19:31.640 --> 00:19:35.760
a diverse team of local and global 
experts with diverse expertise.

00:19:35.760 --> 00:19:40.520
Who can evaluate the proposal so that the 
evaluation scores remains fair and balanced.

00:19:40.520 --> 00:19:46.960
And then we also equipped Terrafund's data and 
monitoring system through TerraMatch so that

00:19:47.520 --> 00:19:53.000
we can capture disaggregated information, analyze 
that over time, and make timely improvements on  

00:19:53.000 --> 00:19:58.640
where the gains are being made and what needs 
to be improved within our team and strategies.

00:20:02.680 --> 00:20:07.000
So if we really look at the early 
results, the early results actually  

00:20:07.000 --> 00:20:13.080
show that terrafund delivers results, both 
environmental, social and financial results.

00:20:13.080 --> 00:20:19.520
Over 50% of the terrafund funding where 
supported women and youth-led organizations

00:20:19.520 --> 00:20:24.240
And it created significant land 
restoration jobs and livelihoods at scale.

00:20:24.240 --> 00:20:29.680
So this is huge. This is equity at scale kind 
of result that is delivered by Terra Fund.

00:20:30.640 --> 00:20:35.480
And one of the interesting innovation that 
happened here is that while we evaluated

00:20:36.040 --> 00:20:42.040
project applications through the waiting criteria 
and conducted some interviews to understand

00:20:42.040 --> 00:20:45.800
different type of power dynamics 
and engagement model they use.

00:20:45.800 --> 00:20:48.920
What really came out interestingly is to  

00:20:48.920 --> 00:20:52.840
realize that there are already 
some organizations in Africa

00:20:52.840 --> 00:20:57.640
that are very serious about gender and social 
equity. They were very innovative in terms of  

00:20:57.640 --> 00:21:04.720
crafting their engagement model to reach out 
to local farmers, poor farmers, pasturalists.

00:21:04.720 --> 00:21:11.520
And then some of the businesses really had their 
business proposition model built in a way that

00:21:11.520 --> 00:21:15.400
More than 80% of their 
businesses are catering to women,  

00:21:15.400 --> 00:21:18.600
right? So women ended up getting 
jobs, youth ended getting jobs.

00:21:18.600 --> 00:21:23.600
So there's a lot of potential and 
untapped opportunity that exists

00:21:23.600 --> 00:21:28.520
around these projects, which we have not analyzed 
yet, right? And that's what we really want to do  

00:21:29.800 --> 00:21:31.480
moving forward.

00:21:31.480 --> 00:21:36.320
So from Terra Fund in Africa, now 
let's move to the 2020 initiative 

00:21:36.320 --> 00:21:39.720
that focuses in Latin America and the Caribbean.

00:21:41.000 --> 00:21:44.560
The Initiative 2020 is a regional 
partnership that aims to bring more  

00:21:44.560 --> 00:21:50.280
than 50 million hectares of degraded land 
into conservation and restoration by 2030.

00:21:50.280 --> 00:21:54.920
Within Latin America and the 
Caribbean, AFOLU or Agriculture,  

00:21:54.920 --> 00:21:58.760
forestry and Land Use Sectors, is 
a key sector in the region that

00:21:58.760 --> 00:22:04.280
is set to achieve climate targets of adaptation, 
mitigation, land degradation and restoration.

00:22:04.280 --> 00:22:09.880
And in this role, in this space, WRI serves 
as the Secretariat of the 2020 initiative and  

00:22:09.880 --> 00:22:16.200
provides engagement, convening, technical support 
and also provide supports to mobilize funding.

00:22:19.000 --> 00:22:22.880
The nature of 2020 initiative is a 
bit different than the Terra Fund  

00:22:22.880 --> 00:22:25.280
because Terra Fund is a fund, 2020 is a platform.

00:22:25.280 --> 00:22:32.160
So for 2020 initiative, engagement and partnership 
is key element to its design and delivery.

00:22:32.160 --> 00:22:34.600
It deliberately aims to ensure diversity  

00:22:34.600 --> 00:22:38.360
of partnerships to create an 
inclusive engagement process

00:22:38.360 --> 00:22:42.480
is a matter of fact, part of the success 
of this initiative is measured by the  

00:22:42.480 --> 00:22:48.240
members of the community and how they feel 
about this the whole engagement process.

00:22:48.240 --> 00:22:51.880
Till date, the initiative 
engaged with 18 countries,  

00:22:51.880 --> 00:22:55.680
136 technical partners, 32 financial partners

00:22:55.680 --> 00:23:00.520
And it has very dedicated tax force on 
technical topics such as biodiversity,  

00:23:00.520 --> 00:23:02.680
assisted natural regeneration.

00:23:02.680 --> 00:23:05.840
carbon markets and investment 
ecosystem, monitoring,  

00:23:05.840 --> 00:23:09.200
policy and incentives and so on and so forth.

00:23:09.200 --> 00:23:14.040
Here, WR's role is that WRF facilitates 
this space, is the secretariat.

00:23:14.040 --> 00:23:20.160
And as such, equity became a criterion 
that could be really important to club  

00:23:20.160 --> 00:23:22.720
within the stakeholder engagement processes.

00:23:25.800 --> 00:23:29.840
More specifically, how equities 
brought into 2020 is through this

00:23:30.640 --> 00:23:36.280
four elements. First, we really identify 
diverse partners that are with very  

00:23:36.280 --> 00:23:39.960
different type of experience to 
participate in this initiative.

00:23:39.960 --> 00:23:44.840
And these partners really share and 
play a decisive co-creative role in  

00:23:44.840 --> 00:23:48.080
how restoration agendas are set and implemented.

00:23:48.080 --> 00:23:51.200
So this is a central element of sharing the power  

00:23:51.200 --> 00:23:56.160
of decision making with the partners 
that really makes it equitable.

00:23:56.160 --> 00:24:01.600
Second, I think problems are really identified 
from the ground and then they are brought

00:24:02.280 --> 00:24:07.080
through to this platform. And then 
WRA also supported partners in terms  

00:24:07.080 --> 00:24:10.360
of data-driven research and collaboration so that

00:24:10.360 --> 00:24:13.560
Some key emerging priorities 
are kind of validated through  

00:24:13.560 --> 00:24:17.160
data and collaborative processes on the ground.

00:24:17.160 --> 00:24:24.280
We are also in discussion to design and 
establish a dedicated tax group that is  

00:24:24.280 --> 00:24:28.800
going to focus on equity, mainly on gender 
and social equity aspects of restoration.

00:24:28.800 --> 00:24:34.120
And this is done because we realize that while 
a lot has been done through the engagement  

00:24:34.120 --> 00:24:40.840
processes, I think if we really center the gender 
and social equity as one dedicated pillar element,

00:24:40.840 --> 00:24:46.920
it will really give them the visibility 
and the privilege of being positioned as  

00:24:46.920 --> 00:24:51.560
a central element and it will be easier 
to run the discussions around that.

00:24:52.560 --> 00:24:57.760
Fourth I think the initiative creates regular 
knowledge exchanges among partners. So it  

00:24:57.760 --> 00:25:01.920
treats the partners as people who 
have knowledges, good knowledges to

00:25:01.920 --> 00:25:05.560
share with the wider group. So 
this knowledge exchange also  

00:25:05.560 --> 00:25:10.360
creates a loop of learning and positive 
influence among different partners.

00:25:10.360 --> 00:25:15.600
And because partners choose on-ground issues 
and solutions through collaborative processes,  

00:25:15.600 --> 00:25:19.760
most of those solutions include 
both technical and social results.

00:25:23.920 --> 00:25:28.600
So if we really look into the early results again 
with the 2020, this shows impressive results.  

00:25:28.600 --> 00:25:34.680
2020 has supported 17.5 million hectares of 
restored land in Latin America and Caribbean.

00:25:34.680 --> 00:25:38.320
It also had links to multiple 
impressive social results.

00:25:43.840 --> 00:25:45.840
The social results here are in terms of knowledge  

00:25:45.840 --> 00:25:48.680
transfer through community of 
practice, which is really key.

00:25:48.680 --> 00:25:52.640
It also accelerated some of the 
funding through the platform.

00:25:52.640 --> 00:25:58.320
It also enables some of the strategic planning and 
help many different countries in preparation to

00:25:58.320 --> 00:26:01.040
the National Restoration 
plan that includes measures  

00:26:01.040 --> 00:26:04.240
to increase positive social impacts as well.

00:26:04.240 --> 00:26:10.320
But if I really look at it as an equity person 
from far, I really feel that within 2020  

00:26:10.320 --> 00:26:15.960
initiative, there's a strong sense of ownership 
and engagement and deliberation of partners.

00:26:15.960 --> 00:26:18.400
that is very unique to the initiative itself.

00:26:19.000 --> 00:26:24.120
I see that as a reflection of the 
success of an equitable engagement  

00:26:24.120 --> 00:26:30.280
process that is plugged within how 
2020 is designed, governed, and run.

00:26:32.800 --> 00:26:36.800
So what do we really make out 
of for this example right like

00:26:36.800 --> 00:26:39.160
We can look at these examples 
from very different angle,  

00:26:39.160 --> 00:26:42.160
but for today's session, where 
I really want to bring you

00:26:42.160 --> 00:26:46.920
is that I really wanted you to 
see that equity integration in  

00:26:46.920 --> 00:26:53.160
both Terra Fund and 2020 initiative 
give us different important takeaways.

00:26:53.160 --> 00:26:58.280
I think one of the most important takeaway for me, 
and I think I want to leave that to you as well,  

00:26:58.280 --> 00:27:04.200
is that equity implementation or 
mainstreaming when it's done right.

00:27:04.200 --> 00:27:07.680
it can yield significant social, environmental,  

00:27:07.680 --> 00:27:13.280
financial impacts that matter to people, that 
matter to climate, that may matter to nature.

00:27:13.280 --> 00:27:17.600
It's a win-win strategy because it 
helps to innovate projects design,  

00:27:17.600 --> 00:27:22.280
create inclusive engagement spaces, 
mitigate gender and social gaps

00:27:22.280 --> 00:27:26.240
and achieve social results that 
really matter to the people who  

00:27:26.240 --> 00:27:28.160
really need these benefits and opportunities.

00:27:30.040 --> 00:27:34.000
Second, I also think that mixed 
knowledge of technical and social  

00:27:34.000 --> 00:27:39.400
sciences is hugely helpful 
for equity implementation.

00:27:39.960 --> 00:27:45.080
Because it creates shared 
understanding, trust and openness.

00:27:45.080 --> 00:27:50.000
among the team, which is sometimes 
very helpful to navigate disagreements,  

00:27:50.000 --> 00:27:51.600
to navigate tension points, and

00:27:51.600 --> 00:27:57.800
to find out the reason of why other person 
is not really moving forward with one idea,  

00:27:57.800 --> 00:28:01.080
right? Sometimes that's not plain resistance.

00:28:01.080 --> 00:28:04.920
Sometimes it's like the person is 
not really familiar with what this 

00:28:04.920 --> 00:28:08.880
process really entails in terms 
of actual actions and activities  

00:28:08.880 --> 00:28:12.280
and why that is important for this project.

00:28:12.280 --> 00:28:13.440
This knowledge, I would say,  

00:28:13.440 --> 00:28:21.480
is also very useful to identify champions 
both within the team and outside the team.

00:28:21.480 --> 00:28:27.160
Why that is important is because I think the mixed 
knowledge really puts you in a space where you

00:28:27.160 --> 00:28:29.840
can see where the other person is coming from,  

00:28:29.840 --> 00:28:33.600
right? Either the person is a 
trend forester, what is really

00:28:33.600 --> 00:28:37.120
important to that person, why that 
person is analyzing certain issues in  

00:28:37.120 --> 00:28:41.640
that way. And also from the social science 
perspective, sometimes we really feel that

00:28:41.640 --> 00:28:45.240
Why the right issues are so important 
to bring into this discussion. And if  

00:28:45.240 --> 00:28:48.640
that doesn't happen to the extent 
that social scientists always want,  

00:28:49.240 --> 00:28:53.840
why that also creates a sense of frustration 
with the pace and the quality of integration.

00:28:53.840 --> 00:28:59.440
So for me, I always find that this knowledge 
has been hugely helpful for me to bridge bond

00:28:59.440 --> 00:29:05.200
and engage with the right champions. And without 
champions, we cannot really move it forward.

00:29:05.200 --> 00:29:06.800
And also, I think along with this,  

00:29:06.800 --> 00:29:10.800
I would like to leave a message 
that whenever we are thinking about

00:29:10.800 --> 00:29:15.040
You know, like climate change 
solutions or environmental issues

00:29:15.040 --> 00:29:19.920
please always think them as a holistic solutions. 
We need holistic solutions. We don't need  

00:29:19.920 --> 00:29:25.200
technical solution or social solution or financial 
solution. We need all the three integrated.

00:29:25.200 --> 00:29:28.280
And there, I think the 
knowledge needs to come through  

00:29:28.280 --> 00:29:32.320
is integrated and solutions needs to 
come through as integrated as well.

00:29:32.320 --> 00:29:35.760
What really helped in this process 
to me is some enablers apart from  

00:29:35.760 --> 00:29:39.040
the knowledge and the team and champions, is that

00:29:39.040 --> 00:29:43.480
Having budget does help because at the end 
of the time we are trying to move projects  

00:29:43.480 --> 00:29:49.960
on the ground. So resource is a huge, huge 
enabler and then champions are hugely useful.

00:29:49.960 --> 00:29:55.880
Without champions, we cannot really 
move it forward. Some barriers that  

00:29:56.400 --> 00:29:58.920
I experienced in this process is that

00:29:58.920 --> 00:30:02.800
Sometimes we speak very different languages 
and use very different type of terms.

00:30:02.800 --> 00:30:08.440
So it takes a lot of time and effort to 
understand that though we use different terms,  

00:30:08.440 --> 00:30:14.000
we are basically meaning the same things. But most 
of the people really don't want to move forward

00:30:14.000 --> 00:30:16.960
Beyond the terminologies, they don't 
want to talk about substance. And  

00:30:16.960 --> 00:30:22.000
so how do we really cultivate that 
kind of, you know, language bridge

00:30:22.000 --> 00:30:25.560
that always remains a challenge. Someone 
really has to pick that conversation,  

00:30:25.560 --> 00:30:29.280
be that conversation maker. 
And that takes a lot of

00:30:29.280 --> 00:30:34.320
time and effort, which is always 
unseen and unaccounted for.

00:30:34.320 --> 00:30:37.400
It also requires a lot of patience 
and perseverance because people are  

00:30:37.400 --> 00:30:40.080
coming from very different technical paradigm of

00:30:40.080 --> 00:30:45.880
what restoration is and should be. And 
sometime on a very subconscious level, I think

00:30:45.880 --> 00:30:49.600
Our forestry degrees sometimes can 
also make us very egoistical and  

00:30:49.600 --> 00:30:54.520
blind to understand what is actually 
happening and needed in the field.

00:30:54.520 --> 00:31:01.160
And examining yourself on a very personal 
level, it does feel vulnerable, right?

00:31:01.160 --> 00:31:05.720
And so I think it requires a lot of 
patience and time for people to kind  

00:31:05.720 --> 00:31:12.240
of allow that space and for them to, you 
know, build some understanding around that.

00:31:12.240 --> 00:31:16.600
And because equity implementation always is about  

00:31:16.600 --> 00:31:20.240
discussion and deliberation 
and decision making sometime

00:31:21.160 --> 00:31:25.920
if there are not spaces that allow equitable 
decision making and sharing of power,  

00:31:25.920 --> 00:31:27.920
even within team members, then that means

00:31:28.440 --> 00:31:33.240
One aspect might get weighted more than 
the other. And that's another challenge.

00:31:33.240 --> 00:31:35.640
So I think I want to move forward and really like  

00:31:35.640 --> 00:31:39.160
bring this back to the audience 
that I'm speaking with you today.

00:31:39.160 --> 00:31:41.680
So how can we really think through these  

00:31:41.680 --> 00:31:45.040
learning points and some of the 
enablers and barriers, right?

00:31:45.560 --> 00:31:50.880
If I were a forest student, like some 
of you are 15 years ago, you know,  

00:31:50.880 --> 00:31:54.240
like I was a first student 
like you. What would I say?

00:31:59.840 --> 00:32:07.600
I would really encourage all the students that 
you know like first degree is a STEM degree. You  

00:32:07.600 --> 00:32:12.760
might have your own inclinations 
and aspirations of why you chose

00:32:12.760 --> 00:32:17.880
to study forestry. So be proud of that 
identity. Build on the forestry knowledge,  

00:32:17.880 --> 00:32:24.000
right? But then don't hold yourself limited by it.

00:32:24.000 --> 00:32:28.000
Be open and curious to also 
understand multiple scientific  

00:32:28.000 --> 00:32:31.200
perspectives, right? So I think being 
openness and curious is key here,  

00:32:31.200 --> 00:32:34.960
especially if you're a student and 
you are engaging in this space.

00:32:34.960 --> 00:32:39.160
Second, if you ever get a chance to 
learn directly from a local community,  

00:32:39.160 --> 00:32:41.720
consider that your golden opportunity, right?

00:32:41.720 --> 00:32:47.080
Because if you just go and talk to a community 
member, either with the forest dependent  

00:32:47.080 --> 00:32:53.200
community or indigenous people, and the way 
they associate forest and natural resources.

00:32:53.200 --> 00:32:59.320
And the way we learn about forests and natural 
resources in university, there's a huge divide.

00:32:59.320 --> 00:33:02.440
But learning both will really make you wise,  

00:33:02.440 --> 00:33:08.160
right? And so I think please consider that as a 
golden opportunity. Seek for those opportunities.

00:33:08.160 --> 00:33:12.000
The third thing I would always 
say is that ground your views on  

00:33:12.000 --> 00:33:15.400
real world conditions. And this 
is extremely important, right?

00:33:17.000 --> 00:33:20.880
My curiosity began when I started 
to notice that on-ground conditions  

00:33:20.880 --> 00:33:23.680
of forest practice in Nepal did not really match

00:33:23.680 --> 00:33:26.400
some of the curricula that was 
being given to me through the  

00:33:26.400 --> 00:33:28.840
first universities and i become curious.

00:33:28.840 --> 00:33:29.880
But at the end of the day,  

00:33:29.880 --> 00:33:35.800
if you really wanted your knowledge to 
be contributing to the field of praxis.

00:33:35.800 --> 00:33:41.040
Simple logic is that it needs to be 
relevant to the real world conditions,  

00:33:41.040 --> 00:33:43.920
right? And so if so ground 
your views in the real world  

00:33:43.920 --> 00:33:47.800
condition and think how can forestry 
knowledge and practice can help me

00:33:47.800 --> 00:33:52.800
to deliver and to address those real world 
issues and condition. And in that process,  

00:33:52.800 --> 00:33:57.720
please be open for relearning. That's 
extremely important and growth.

00:33:59.560 --> 00:34:04.760
I think embracing some level of openness, 
adaptability and respect to diverse views,  

00:34:04.760 --> 00:34:07.800
knowledges and people is extremely important.

00:34:07.800 --> 00:34:13.640
This especially is important because I 
think in some universities and contexts,  

00:34:13.640 --> 00:34:16.280
forestry or STEM degree is seen as

00:34:16.280 --> 00:34:19.320
kind of a little bit, you know, 
like degree that require more  

00:34:19.320 --> 00:34:23.480
intellect or that is considered 
a little bit of a more hierarchy

00:34:23.480 --> 00:34:27.040
Compared to other topics such as 
in social sciences. And I get to  

00:34:27.040 --> 00:34:30.080
hear that personally from a lot 
of my forester friends that, oh,  

00:34:30.080 --> 00:34:34.360
now you become a social scientist. You are 
not anymore a forester, for example, right?

00:34:34.360 --> 00:34:37.400
So I think let's not reach 
there. That's a very limited  

00:34:37.400 --> 00:34:43.560
field to be in. So please resist that 
subconscious tendency to be encumbered.

00:34:43.560 --> 00:34:48.480
by the burden's limit or ego of 
your science knowledge paradigm.

00:34:48.480 --> 00:34:51.200
And don't be encumbered, right? Carry it.

00:34:51.200 --> 00:34:54.680
We do, but then be open to make it wider.

00:34:54.680 --> 00:34:57.760
This is my message to the forest 
students and to forest faculty  

00:34:57.760 --> 00:35:03.800
and academia or to the Alma Mater. I would 
like to say some of these points as well.

00:35:08.240 --> 00:35:10.760
I would also see that first universities like  

00:35:10.760 --> 00:35:15.760
Virginia Tech can also play a 
huge important role around here.

00:35:15.760 --> 00:35:19.680
And this can take shape in many 
different forms. For example,  

00:35:19.680 --> 00:35:23.080
universities can really diversify 
and teach curricula that reflects  

00:35:23.080 --> 00:35:27.120
the on-ground situation and needs 
of forestry practice on the ground.

00:35:27.760 --> 00:35:32.200
This can be done in different ways. I think 
you can curate inclusive spaces of belonging,  

00:35:32.200 --> 00:35:35.680
representation, and voices of 
diverse genders and actors.

00:35:36.280 --> 00:35:40.280
in being invited into this 
space is one example of that.

00:35:40.280 --> 00:35:44.360
You can also foster action research 
with mixed methods and knowledge  

00:35:44.360 --> 00:35:46.440
exchanges because that's extremely important.

00:35:48.840 --> 00:35:53.400
We foster that type of critical inquiry 
that comes from field of practice and  

00:35:53.400 --> 00:35:55.280
comes through different type of knowledge systems.

00:35:55.280 --> 00:36:01.040
So the students are equipped to embrace that 
kind of knowledge and see the value around it.

00:36:01.840 --> 00:36:06.560
And I think if we can also do something 
that would really help the students

00:36:07.160 --> 00:36:13.920
to do critical inquiry, but with self-reflexivity 
and power sharing. That is hugely helpful.

00:36:13.920 --> 00:36:15.840
I'm saying this because I think as a forester,  

00:36:15.840 --> 00:36:24.520
I always felt that forest fraternity is mostly 
in many countries implementing is paramilitary

00:36:24.520 --> 00:36:28.080
And most of the foresters really hold 
that power to themselves that, oh,  

00:36:28.080 --> 00:36:32.040
they are the ones who are going to manage 
the forest and all the people that don't

00:36:32.040 --> 00:36:37.480
Listen to them are kind of outsiders and they 
need to be treated with penalty and as such.

00:36:37.480 --> 00:36:43.040
And I think that really reflects on where that 
kind of connotation came from. Most of those  

00:36:43.040 --> 00:36:49.400
connotations came from early forest universities 
that really focused on traditional conservation,

00:36:49.400 --> 00:36:53.360
a little bit of neocolonialistic Western models of  

00:36:53.360 --> 00:36:57.160
what forests to ease and how 
forests should be managed.

00:36:57.160 --> 00:36:59.560
But then forced practice has 
evolved since then. We have  

00:36:59.560 --> 00:37:02.760
learned a lot about community 
forests, indigenous peoples.

00:37:02.760 --> 00:37:05.880
ways of looking at forests, how that are also very  

00:37:05.880 --> 00:37:09.840
useful ways of managing the 
forest and forest resources.

00:37:09.840 --> 00:37:15.240
But we have not really in cultivated 
the virtue of self-reflexivity within  

00:37:15.240 --> 00:37:19.240
foresters. And this is something that 
universities really need to think through.

00:37:19.240 --> 00:37:25.720
I find foresters who are excellent technical 
experts, but they lack zero empathy.

00:37:25.720 --> 00:37:31.920
And universal skills. And I don't think, you know, 
the job market really needs that type of people.

00:37:31.920 --> 00:37:36.680
So I think in order to, you 
know, like mitigate that gap,  

00:37:36.680 --> 00:37:41.440
we really need to think about cultivating 
those kind of aptitude skills as well.

00:37:41.440 --> 00:37:45.600
And last but not least, and this is 
a difficult one because I feel like

00:37:45.600 --> 00:37:47.560
Whenever we think about all my matter,  

00:37:47.560 --> 00:37:53.800
back to all the first universities 
that I went to, I really wish they have

00:37:54.480 --> 00:37:59.120
taught me forestry in a very 
wider and holistic ways.

00:37:59.120 --> 00:38:03.720
What I really mean to say here is that I think 
forestry curriculum is still very traditional.

00:38:03.720 --> 00:38:08.600
It has not expanded to the extent 
it should have expanded. And that's  

00:38:08.600 --> 00:38:11.360
kind of a disservice because we 
already know that there are so

00:38:12.040 --> 00:38:18.480
useful mechanisms, local indigenous 
practice around forestry that exist.

00:38:18.480 --> 00:38:23.240
So how do we bring those back within 
this creative thinking and curriculum  

00:38:23.240 --> 00:38:28.640
making process and redefine 
and pluralize forest science.

00:38:28.640 --> 00:38:31.040
And I think that's really important because if we  

00:38:31.040 --> 00:38:35.800
really want to tackle the urgency of 
climate change, environmental crisis,

00:38:35.800 --> 00:38:40.680
We cannot do with the science or analysis 
system, which is very sectoral and which is  

00:38:40.680 --> 00:38:45.320
very narrow and which is far from 
meeting the needs on the ground.

00:38:49.920 --> 00:38:54.800
I want to thank you and I also want to 
thank some of my team members from the  

00:38:54.800 --> 00:38:59.160
World Resource Institute, especially from 
the Global Restoration Initiative, namely

00:38:59.160 --> 00:39:05.840
Adena Zamora, who leads the 2020 initiative, 
Will Anderson, who leads the AFR100 initiative,  

00:39:05.840 --> 00:39:10.120
and Sean David, who manages the 
Global Restoration Initiative.

00:39:10.120 --> 00:39:14.000
This is a collective effort. 
And so thank you. And again,  

00:39:14.000 --> 00:39:18.280
thank you to Maria Elisa Christie 
and the university for having me.

00:39:18.280 --> 00:39:27.680
Thank you. Over to you. And I'm 
happy to answer any questions.

00:39:27.680 --> 00:39:31.480
Okay, wow. Thank you, Kalpana. That was great.

00:39:31.480 --> 00:39:33.320
It's very exciting to see.

00:39:33.320 --> 00:39:38.160
You know, it was like 15 years ago that you and I 
started working on gender and forestry in Nepal.

00:39:38.160 --> 00:39:42.640
So it's really exciting to see that 
you're now working with WRI and all the

00:39:42.640 --> 00:39:45.160
different things that you're doing. 
And thank you for so many messages  

00:39:45.160 --> 00:39:47.720
to our students and faculty here at Virginia Tech.

00:39:50.880 --> 00:39:55.200
I want to say there was an oversight. I forgot 
to say at the beginning, it's very important.

00:39:59.640 --> 00:40:04.680
This talk is also co-hosted by Diverse 
Voices and Perspectives lecture series.

00:40:04.680 --> 00:40:09.960
So that's very important. And because we are 
also part of International Education Week,  

00:40:09.960 --> 00:40:13.080
which is not only here at Virginia Tech, but

00:40:13.920 --> 00:40:17.920
So hopefully that brought 
some audience to our thing  

00:40:17.920 --> 00:40:21.440
today that wouldn't have heard about it otherwise.

00:40:21.440 --> 00:40:27.000
So, okay, so now we have time for 
questions. I didn't see very many in the  

00:40:28.280 --> 00:40:33.200
questions, but if you want to raise 
your hand, then I can call on you.

00:40:33.200 --> 00:40:46.640
If you want to make a comment or have a 
question, that is how we would proceed now.

00:40:48.760 --> 00:40:53.400
Yes, I see a question. Okay, let's see. Am I 
still on mute? Yes. Okay, from Bonnie Zaire.

00:40:54.440 --> 00:40:58.240
And Bonnie's our director here at Virginia 
Tech, our director of Women's and Gender and  

00:40:58.240 --> 00:41:01.920
Sexuality Studies. Bonnie, are you wanting to 
speak yourself? Do you want me to read this?

00:41:01.920 --> 00:41:03.240
I'd be happy to read it. Thank you.

00:41:03.240 --> 00:41:04.040
Okay, great.

00:41:05.280 --> 00:41:06.840
Thanks so much for being here.

00:41:06.840 --> 00:41:09.080
I was wondering to what degree you feel you're  

00:41:09.080 --> 00:41:12.840
directly taking on capitalist 
policy as you do this work?

00:41:12.840 --> 00:41:16.440
Do you see your work, and then 
part two, do you see your work  

00:41:16.440 --> 00:41:20.680
fitting into a transnational feminist 
perspective where you're working across  

00:41:20.680 --> 00:41:25.440
borders and keeping the excesses of 
hyper capitalist policies in mind?

00:41:25.440 --> 00:41:30.160
Or do you see it more as third world 
feminism where you're looking more at  

00:41:30.160 --> 00:41:36.600
the local context and listening to the people 
and using that as sort of the springboard?

00:41:36.600 --> 00:41:41.320
Thank you. Thank you so much. I think that's a 
very difficult question, but thanks for asking.

00:41:42.960 --> 00:41:46.600
To begin with, what I would really 
like to say is that I am a strong  

00:41:46.600 --> 00:41:50.520
believer of justice and rights. I 
consider myself a huge feminist,  

00:41:50.520 --> 00:41:55.840
right? And I do call out issues when 
I see some wrongdoings around that.

00:41:55.840 --> 00:42:00.880
But also, I think I would need to reflect that I 
work in a development practice, which is highly  

00:42:00.880 --> 00:42:06.600
based on institutions and structures that 
is neo-colonistic in nature, right? And so

00:42:06.600 --> 00:42:12.080
And third is whenever you are working with 
topics like restoration, you are engaging  

00:42:12.080 --> 00:42:17.280
with local communities and that really 
brings me into this blended spaces where

00:42:17.840 --> 00:42:23.360
I think the utility of one principle doesn't 
hold value. What really holds value is what  

00:42:23.360 --> 00:42:29.680
is the need of the local communities, where do 
they really want themselves see going, right?

00:42:29.680 --> 00:42:32.560
And if they really need jobs 
and livelihood and they wanted  

00:42:32.560 --> 00:42:35.720
more local economies coming out of restoration,  

00:42:36.360 --> 00:42:42.520
do we really think that is a translation 
of neoliberal or neo-capitalistic model

00:42:42.520 --> 00:42:45.720
Or do you rather think that 
is something that local people  

00:42:45.720 --> 00:42:50.560
really want and that they really want 
it to move their life forward, right?

00:42:50.560 --> 00:42:55.400
And I think these questions therefore also needs 
to be thought from the practical perspective.

00:42:56.120 --> 00:43:00.240
How do we bring it on the ground? 
What are we really seeing it

00:43:00.240 --> 00:43:05.280
And it's a gray area. I would totally 
admit that sometimes it might feel that,  

00:43:05.280 --> 00:43:07.320
oh, maybe it's a very heavy model, right?

00:43:08.120 --> 00:43:13.720
We have been very conscious and intentional in 
our efforts in global restoration initiative to

00:43:13.720 --> 00:43:19.560
not simply borrow that idea, but really 
engage the local actors and communities to

00:43:19.560 --> 00:43:21.000
understand what they are coming from,  

00:43:21.000 --> 00:43:24.960
what kind of modality might be the 
best modality to work around that.

00:43:24.960 --> 00:43:29.600
One way we do that is we do not 
really fund large scale restoration,  

00:43:29.600 --> 00:43:33.960
right? Like large companies going 
there and just engaging communities is

00:43:33.960 --> 00:43:39.960
extractive laborers, we don't do that. We rather 
made a decision to fund a small organization that  

00:43:39.960 --> 00:43:44.680
do quality type of work on restoration, 
but do generate some markets and money.

00:43:44.680 --> 00:43:48.080
Because that is also essential 
to create jobs and give back  

00:43:48.080 --> 00:43:51.320
to the communities. So this is, I would say.

00:43:51.320 --> 00:43:54.480
I do not see those areas as 
very divergent, you know,  

00:43:54.480 --> 00:43:59.440
because of this experience now. Before I was 
like, no, I don't want to engage in that space.

00:43:59.440 --> 00:44:03.400
But now I feel that in the practice, conceptually,  

00:44:03.400 --> 00:44:09.120
there are huge divides between finance 
and equity. The science doesn't even meet.

00:44:09.120 --> 00:44:13.720
But then in practice. You realize that 
they actually come together. And I  

00:44:13.720 --> 00:44:22.800
think that's how I would like to really frame it.

00:44:22.800 --> 00:44:26.760
Any more questions or comments?

00:44:26.760 --> 00:44:32.200
I saw that Bonnie also put in the chat, please 
be open for relearning is a great message.

00:44:35.720 --> 00:44:40.200
I made a note of something about you 
said how you know different paradigms  

00:44:40.200 --> 00:44:43.680
require patience since I work in a 
multidisciplinary environment and

00:44:43.680 --> 00:44:49.400
Virginia tech is doing work in 
restoration and it is, you know,  

00:44:49.400 --> 00:44:52.400
different experts from very different fields so.

00:44:52.400 --> 00:44:56.240
The idea that you need patience 
and also respect for each other 

00:44:56.240 --> 00:45:01.040
in this kind of hierarchical thing is 
really important. So I appreciated that.

00:45:01.040 --> 00:45:08.520
Yeah, I think on that, I really wanted to say that

00:45:12.160 --> 00:45:15.680
I think before, you know, like if 
you really met me 10 years before,  

00:45:15.680 --> 00:45:19.440
I think I would really get angry 
on those kind of interfaces.

00:45:19.440 --> 00:45:23.520
I did not really have the skills it developed 
on how do you actually navigate through  

00:45:23.520 --> 00:45:26.680
that. So I would also say that that's a 
huge skill set that would develop as a

00:45:26.680 --> 00:45:31.560
is a person working on transdisciplinary 
or interdisciplinary teams

00:45:31.560 --> 00:45:34.520
And that requires effort. It doesn't just come by,  

00:45:34.520 --> 00:45:38.120
right? Like I think you go through 
the process, you reflect on it.

00:45:38.120 --> 00:45:43.600
For me, what really helped, I think the 
mix of knowledges always helped me because

00:45:43.600 --> 00:45:46.200
if let's say a forest minister say that,  

00:45:46.200 --> 00:45:50.200
oh, I really don't understand why they 
are always talking about human rights.

00:45:50.200 --> 00:45:53.240
I really don't get like we are 
doing forest protection and local  

00:45:53.240 --> 00:45:55.760
communities engagement. What more do they want?

00:45:55.760 --> 00:45:59.840
then I know that for this person, first 
protection is the main area that they're  

00:45:59.840 --> 00:46:04.640
concerned about, right? They don't really can 
even bring them to think about human rights.

00:46:04.640 --> 00:46:06.680
They are like human rights 
should be done by someone else,  

00:46:06.680 --> 00:46:09.640
not by forestry Ministries, right? So that's the

00:46:09.640 --> 00:46:14.480
a level of thinking and space that they're 
operating from. And so when you know that.

00:46:14.480 --> 00:46:17.640
You cannot be angry with them 
anymore. Rather, you would say,  

00:46:17.640 --> 00:46:22.560
okay, here we are using different terms, 
but where does the connection actually comes

00:46:22.560 --> 00:46:24.640
close to both sides of the world,  

00:46:24.640 --> 00:46:31.480
right? So sometimes I feel that kind 
of translation of perhaps did not um

00:46:31.480 --> 00:46:36.320
Simplifying the bigger concepts 
of equity, human rights, feminism 

00:46:36.320 --> 00:46:42.280
within some simple terms that 
sound digestible to the other  

00:46:42.280 --> 00:46:46.560
sector might be helpful to open up conversation.

00:46:47.680 --> 00:46:50.160
Yeah, but sometimes I also 
feel that the challenge is  

00:46:50.160 --> 00:46:53.840
there. Sometimes you also feel 
that you're hitting the wall.

00:46:53.840 --> 00:46:59.720
There's no, you know, like windows out there 
to open up. And at times you feel that you  

00:46:59.720 --> 00:47:04.720
are not with the right people and right 
team to even initiate those conversations.

00:47:07.040 --> 00:47:12.280
Yep.

00:47:12.280 --> 00:47:16.120
We have several comments in the chat. 
I hope people are reading the chat.

00:47:16.120 --> 00:47:18.240
They're not questions, so 
I'm not going to read them,  

00:47:18.240 --> 00:47:20.280
but please feel free to 
keep putting your comments.

00:47:22.440 --> 00:47:27.200
I want to say since we're coming to the end, 
I do want to say, I think Pratirakshya has  

00:47:27.200 --> 00:47:30.280
already put the link for the survey and 
we'll also send it when this is over.

00:47:31.240 --> 00:47:38.440
I want to let you know that we have a great lineup 
also for the Spring, including presentations on

00:47:38.440 --> 00:47:46.760
on India as a megacity, on Colombia, and in 
April, a final presentation looking at the  

00:47:46.760 --> 00:47:50.320
Andes in Appalachia from a food
geography perspective.

00:47:52.880 --> 00:47:57.360
When you do the survey, you have the option 
to sign on to our WGD listserv and then you  

00:47:57.360 --> 00:48:01.240
will get the information about that. Or you 
can just come back and look at our website.

00:48:01.240 --> 00:48:04.600
But our next event won't be till February.

00:48:06.280 --> 00:48:11.600
So if we don't have more questions, I'm 
gonna ask Kalpana, is there anything?

00:48:12.240 --> 00:48:14.520
I actually thought of this in our last speaker,  

00:48:14.520 --> 00:48:16.960
and it was the first time I thought 
of it, but I want to ask you,  

00:48:16.960 --> 00:48:23.960
is there anything else you'd like to say that 
crammed into your 20, 25 minute presentation.

00:48:25.000 --> 00:48:27.800
Not so much on the content, but 
I think I just wanted to leave a  

00:48:27.800 --> 00:48:31.320
message back to the team and to 
you, Maria Elisa Christie, that

00:48:31.320 --> 00:48:35.640
Sometimes, you know, you 
don't um how should I put it?

00:48:35.640 --> 00:48:39.800
You don't plan everything, you 
know, like a strategist, right?

00:48:39.800 --> 00:48:44.400
I think if I really recall the connection 
we made to do the work in Nepal,  

00:48:44.400 --> 00:48:48.680
it was a very impromptu connection 
that we made. And we said, okay, let's

00:48:48.680 --> 00:48:53.840
do a small research and find out 
how women foresters feel about 

00:48:53.840 --> 00:48:56.800
their choices and experiences in forestry.

00:48:56.800 --> 00:48:59.120
And we connected from there. 
We published some data,  

00:48:59.120 --> 00:49:02.080
did a research and things like that right and then

00:49:02.080 --> 00:49:04.040
In between, we connected.

00:49:04.040 --> 00:49:06.400
And then later, when I moved to US,  

00:49:06.400 --> 00:49:09.920
then we connected again and now I'm 
here, right? So sometimes I think

00:49:09.920 --> 00:49:16.400
To students, I would also say that I 
mean, if my PhD has taught me one thing,  

00:49:16.400 --> 00:49:22.480
it is to trust on my vibe's 
or on my feelings, right?

00:49:22.480 --> 00:49:27.080
Because I think the more depth you go, 
you identify yourself more clearly.  

00:49:27.080 --> 00:49:29.840
Who are you as a person? What do you want?

00:49:29.840 --> 00:49:32.960
What kind of networks and mentors 
you want to be associated with,  

00:49:32.960 --> 00:49:37.280
what kind of people really consume your 
energy and you don't want to be around that.

00:49:37.280 --> 00:49:44.280
So I think I want to say this, especially if 
there are students listening to this, is that

00:49:44.280 --> 00:49:49.960
Don't spend too much time in over planning and 
being a strategist, right? Go with the flow.

00:49:49.960 --> 00:49:53.760
Allow yourself the space to be you and then

00:49:53.760 --> 00:49:59.920
through your job, through PhDs, you know, through 
different new jobs and experiences that you own

00:50:00.680 --> 00:50:03.240
discern what you like and what you don't like,  

00:50:03.240 --> 00:50:07.040
right? And if you like certain 
networks and groups and people

00:50:07.040 --> 00:50:11.240
be in touch, right? And you don't really 
have to send like 10 emails for that,  

00:50:11.240 --> 00:50:16.920
but just like an occasional hello and appreciating 
the readings and papers. I think that's how you

00:50:16.920 --> 00:50:20.280
create very real authentic relationship

00:50:20.280 --> 00:50:22.560
And now I just want to reflect that because I  

00:50:22.560 --> 00:50:27.000
think I and Maria Elisa Christie 
connected because of one thing.

00:50:27.000 --> 00:50:32.920
And now I'm here again reconnecting, I think after 
10 years on this space with all of you, right?

00:50:32.920 --> 00:50:38.320
And so please take this as the virtue or the

00:50:38.320 --> 00:50:42.800
you know is the feel of collaboration and 
the need of connecting to the right people  

00:50:42.800 --> 00:50:46.120
and networks. And I think eventually 
that will bring you into a space where  

00:50:46.120 --> 00:50:50.840
you feel more comfortable, you are 
supported by the mentors and peers.

00:50:50.840 --> 00:50:54.040
And they are also your go-to 
people when you feel like

00:50:54.040 --> 00:50:58.840
Nothing is moving. There's a wall heating 
and things like that, right? So I think

00:50:58.840 --> 00:51:03.200
I just wanted to flag that and also say 
thank you to Marie Alyssa Christie for  

00:51:03.200 --> 00:51:07.680
the partnership we formed and for bringing 
me into this space yet again. Thank you.

00:51:07.680 --> 00:51:12.320
Well, thank you, Kalpana. I see that we 
have a new message and we still have a few  

00:51:12.320 --> 00:51:15.880
minutes. So Maureen, I asked, but you 
didn't answer my text. Do you want to  

00:51:15.880 --> 00:51:18.560
read it out loud? Otherwise, I'm going 
to go ahead and read it for you. I'll  

00:51:18.560 --> 00:51:26.800
give you a minute to unmute yourself 
if you'd like to read it yourself.

00:51:26.800 --> 00:51:31.000
Okay, I'm going to go ahead and read it. 
And the question for Maureen Agada is,  

00:51:31.000 --> 00:51:33.680
what strategies have you found most effective?

00:51:33.680 --> 00:51:37.120
for opening up conversations 
and breaking down walls with  

00:51:37.120 --> 00:51:43.200
team members who may not be initially 
receptive to equity-focused discussions.

00:51:43.200 --> 00:51:48.520
Yeah, I think that's really interesting. 
What really helps is I think one is pick  

00:51:48.520 --> 00:51:52.640
the conversation, right? So for example, if 
I feel like some people are really not keen,  

00:51:52.640 --> 00:51:55.480
I say, hey, can we actually talk over coffee?

00:51:55.480 --> 00:52:00.120
And have a chat around that. So I think be the 
one who picks on the conversation, first of all,  

00:52:00.120 --> 00:52:06.160
right? Don't be afraid to do that. Don't feel 
like resistance and don't plan things too much,  

00:52:06.160 --> 00:52:10.360
right? Don't overthink and say that I just 
want to go and have a chat with this person.

00:52:10.360 --> 00:52:13.160
And if the person are coming 
from very different sectors,  

00:52:13.160 --> 00:52:15.920
like financial sectors, technical sectors.

00:52:16.680 --> 00:52:21.120
You know, like allow yourself to also think 
that they might not be knowing anything about  

00:52:21.120 --> 00:52:25.600
equity and the thing that you're making 
is not making sense to them right and so

00:52:25.600 --> 00:52:30.120
go with that kind of openness in 
your mind. So that always helps.  

00:52:30.120 --> 00:52:33.960
So be the conversation starter, 
pick that conversation. Second.

00:52:33.960 --> 00:52:36.440
Help them. Second, I think

00:52:36.440 --> 00:52:41.360
Leave the jargons and focus on the substance, 
right? That's what I always say because

00:52:41.360 --> 00:52:44.960
In equity, like if we really talk 
about women's right and all that,  

00:52:44.960 --> 00:52:48.840
we use the term economic 
empowerment of women a lot, right?

00:52:48.840 --> 00:52:52.120
But if you really go to finance people, 
they are like, okay, I understand economic,  

00:52:52.120 --> 00:52:56.200
but what is this empowerment? This 
looks so difficult, right? And so

00:52:56.200 --> 00:53:01.160
But they do talk about financial inclusion. 
They do targeting, you know, and so I think

00:53:01.160 --> 00:53:04.400
The more you talk, you start to 
identify that there are certain  

00:53:04.400 --> 00:53:09.560
commonalities in substance 
that each sector has or have.

00:53:09.560 --> 00:53:14.360
And then your job is to really identify 
that and bring it together. That's second.

00:53:14.360 --> 00:53:17.680
But at times, sometimes you find that 
some people are really not giving you  

00:53:17.680 --> 00:53:22.360
the vibe of discussion and conversation and 
you really don't have the patience and energy.

00:53:22.360 --> 00:53:24.360
take a break, right?

00:53:24.360 --> 00:53:29.400
I always say, okay, let's 
revisit this after two weeks.

00:53:30.160 --> 00:53:33.640
And that helps hugely, right? 
Because I think sometimes we

00:53:33.640 --> 00:53:39.000
We all have, and especially in development 
space, I would say people are so

00:53:39.000 --> 00:53:41.080
kind of busy with the work and they have always  

00:53:41.080 --> 00:53:44.720
some deadlines and reports and all 
that coming on and sometime when

00:53:44.720 --> 00:53:48.080
we pick on this conversation, 
the timing needs to be right,  

00:53:48.080 --> 00:53:50.800
right? And if you feel that 
people are not really responding.

00:53:50.800 --> 00:53:53.560
They could also be really pressed 
between deadlines and they really  

00:53:53.560 --> 00:53:56.560
don't want to think about a new topic. So in those

00:53:56.560 --> 00:54:00.120
Moments allowing yourself 
and that person the space

00:54:00.120 --> 00:54:02.160
And say, let's revisit this

00:54:02.160 --> 00:54:03.960
It's super helpful.

00:54:04.520 --> 00:54:07.200
So I think be that person and then you will find  

00:54:07.200 --> 00:54:10.400
that people actually open up 
and they also want to find

00:54:10.400 --> 00:54:13.680
ways to work with you. It's both ways. I think  

00:54:13.680 --> 00:54:16.680
most of the people want to 
work together but sometimes

00:54:16.680 --> 00:54:24.880
they don't really have the, I think, patience 
language and skill set to bridge that space.

00:54:24.880 --> 00:54:28.280
That is wonderful. I love that. You know, as a

00:54:28.280 --> 00:54:32.040
Director of Women and Gender, 
I have students often ask me.

00:54:32.040 --> 00:54:34.680
my strategy, you know, how to be successful

00:54:34.680 --> 00:54:36.960
And what you said first about basically  

00:54:36.960 --> 00:54:40.960
following your instinct and what's 
important and maintaining networks

00:54:40.960 --> 00:54:46.600
I think are in developing and building 
networks are things that I always say but

00:54:47.120 --> 00:54:49.480
Patience is something that I 
usually put in my New Year's  

00:54:49.480 --> 00:54:52.520
resolution every year. It's been many, many years.

00:54:52.520 --> 00:54:55.760
I haven't achieved it yet, but I think

00:54:55.760 --> 00:55:00.840
That's also a great strategy and to have 
informal conversations with people and  

00:55:00.840 --> 00:55:06.120
to realize that they don't actually understand 
where you're coming from. So breaking it down to

00:55:07.800 --> 00:55:12.600
smaller ways of describing what you do 
and being patient with other people who  

00:55:12.600 --> 00:55:14.920
don't understand. I think those 
are just wonderful strategies.  

00:55:14.920 --> 00:55:17.680
I'm sure they're serving you well 
at the World Resources Institute.

00:55:18.440 --> 00:55:25.800
I want to congratulate you for your wisdom, 
you're not that old but you're becoming very wise

00:55:25.800 --> 00:55:29.080
And I hope you're becoming very 
effective in your work there.

00:55:29.080 --> 00:55:35.160
Thank you so much. Thank you. Yeah, wiser. And 
I think I'm easing beautifully, I would say.

00:55:35.160 --> 00:55:36.800
Well…

00:55:36.800 --> 00:55:42.040
But I always feel that I think the learning 
of both technical and social sciences helps  

00:55:42.040 --> 00:55:45.160
a lot. So I would also say like if 
you're a student or even a faculty,  

00:55:45.160 --> 00:55:49.040
read a lot about the other 
person's work as well, because

00:55:49.040 --> 00:55:51.160
like that nowadays I read so much about finance,  

00:55:51.160 --> 00:55:54.560
right? About this neocolonialistic 
models, right? And I'm like.

00:55:54.560 --> 00:55:59.400
okay how do I, you know, like breeze this 
like this is a gray area and things like  

00:55:59.400 --> 00:56:02.480
that. So I think reading helps a 
lot. At least it gives you some  

00:56:02.480 --> 00:56:05.480
conceptual awareness of where you are landing in.

00:56:05.480 --> 00:56:09.360
And then use some of the strategies 
that I think I and Maria Alicia shared.

00:56:09.360 --> 00:56:10.520
Yep.

00:56:10.520 --> 00:56:13.880
Yeah, and my team is good. I would 
say that in Old Resource Institute,  

00:56:13.880 --> 00:56:17.200
I was able to do this work because of one.

00:56:17.200 --> 00:56:20.400
People really want to do this work, 
but they simply didn't know how,  

00:56:20.400 --> 00:56:23.400
right? So really creating 
that niche was very helpful.

00:56:23.400 --> 00:56:28.520
And second, there are champions who really 
are committed on these issues, right?

00:56:28.520 --> 00:56:33.640
So I think identifying who the champions 
are and mobilizing them forward is a team  

00:56:33.640 --> 00:56:39.400
and putting collective efforts really 
made the efforts possible, basically.

00:56:39.400 --> 00:56:43.240
Wonderful. Well, thank you for 
your professional presentation  

00:56:43.240 --> 00:56:46.400
and your personal advice. I think a lot of people

00:56:47.760 --> 00:56:49.800
Not only listening today, but as I say,  

00:56:49.800 --> 00:56:52.920
this will be recorded. So people 
will come back and listen to it.

00:56:52.920 --> 00:56:57.600
Again, so thank you so much. And thank 
you everybody who joined us today.

00:56:58.400 --> 00:57:01.400
Have a wonderful day. Hope to 
see you in the spring. Kalpana,  

00:57:01.400 --> 00:57:04.840
I hope you will join us also for 
check our topics in the spring.

00:57:04.840 --> 00:57:08.440
Maybe there'll be something that's 
interesting to you. So thank you,  

00:57:08.440 --> 00:57:10.320
everybody. And thank you so much.

