Media condemn Charlie Hebdo attack as assault on freedom of expression | World news | The GuardianMedia condemn Charlie Hebdo attack as assault on freedom of expression | World news | The Guardian










Close






Skip to main content

 









sign in








subscribe









search




jobs






more


from the guardian:


jobs


change edition:



switch to the UK edition


switch to the AU edition







US edition




switch to the UK edition




switch to the Australia edition













The Guardian


Winner of the Pulitzer prize











home


›
world


›
europe




americas


asia


middle east


africa


australia


UK










home




US




world
selected




opinion




sports




soccer




tech




arts




lifestyle




fashion




business




money




travel




environment







browse all sections
close







 











Charlie Hebdo attack



Media condemn Charlie Hebdo attack as assault on freedom of expression









Newspapers, novelists and scholars across the globe seek to make sense of the murders in Paris and their implications














Flowers and other tributes to the victims left outside the offices of Charlie Hebdo in Paris on Thursday. Photograph: Francois Mori/AP




Anne Penketh in Paris and 
Tania Branigan in Beijing


Thursday 8 January 2015 06.56 EST







Share on Facebook







Share on Twitter







Share via Email







Share on LinkedIn







Share on Google+







Share on WhatsApp
















French newspapers have united in condemning the killing of journalists at the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo as an unacceptable assault on freedom of expression.
Le Parisien’s front-page headline on Thursday read “They shall not kill freedom”. For Le Monde, Wednesday’s attack was “The French 9/11”.
The leftwing Libération headline “We are all Charlie” reflected the Twitter hashtag #jesuischarlie (I am Charlie), which expressed worldwide solidarity after the attack. Nine journalists, a maintenance worker and two police officers lost their lives in the shooting at the Paris offices of Charlie Hebdo.
Le Figaro ran a giant headline “Liberty assassinated”, and commented in a front-page editorial that “this is war. A real war, not by soldiers, but by shadowy assassins, methodical and organised assassins whose quiet savagery freezes the blood.” The rightwing paper called for society to unite against the jihadi threat, and for the tightening of “complacent” laws that had allowed religious fanatics to hijack the internet.
Striking a different tone, Libération’s editorial by its editor, Laurent Joffrin, said that the attackers “wanted to take the war into our newsrooms. We shall not wage war. We aren’t soldiers. But we shall defend our knowhow and vocation: to help the reader to feel like a citizen.”



Le Figaro’s front page on the Charlie Hebdo attack.
Photograph: Le Figaro


Media organisations, scholars and others around the world sought to make sense of the murders in Paris and their implications as the news spread. While some searched for causes and others for solutions, the overwhelming message was of solidarity with the victims and Charlie Hebdo.
The Daily Mail said in an editorial: “If liberty is to mean anything, it must include the freedom to mock, offend or question the beliefs of others, within the limits of democratically decided law.
“On any other day, the Mail would feel only distaste for a French magazine with a history of sniggering at faiths held sacred by billions worldwide. But today, freedom lovers everywhere, whatever their religion, should proclaim the slogan of solidarity with the murdered staff of Charlie Hebdo: ‘Je suis Charlie!’”
Ross Douthat, blogging at the New York Times website, went further by arguing that while “under many circumstances the choice to give offense (religious and otherwise) can be reasonably criticized as pointlessly antagonising, needlessly cruel, or simply stupid … The legitimacy and wisdom of such criticism is generally inversely proportional to the level of mortal danger that the blasphemer brings upon himself.
“When offences are policed by murder, that’s when we need more of them, not less, because the murderers cannot be allowed for a single moment to think that their strategy can succeed.”
Many expressed concern about potential reactions to the massacre and a backlash against the Muslim community in France and further afield.
“It is absurd to suggest that the way to avoid terrorist attacks is to let the terrorists dictate standards in a democracy,” said an editorial in the New York Times. “This is also no time for peddlers of xenophobia to try to smear all Muslims with a terrorist brush.”
British novelist Hari Kunzru tweeted: “Islamists use old Leninist tactic: attacks like #CharlieHebdo intended to sharpen contradictions. Calls for extreme responses fall into trap … Watch Fox and similar whip up frenzy, completing the other half of the terrorists’ work for them. Resist this.”
Yascha Mounk, a fellow at the thinktank New America, wrote at Slate that “while the European far right points to Islamic terrorism to exclude and malign all Muslims, the European left responds by refusing to recognize how fundamental a challenge Islamic terrorism represents (or that it is inspired by Islam at all).”
On the New Yorker website, George Packer stressed that many Muslims had immediately condemned the killings and dismissed those who sought to blame the theological content of Islam for the attack.
But he added: “Islam today includes a substantial minority of believers who countenance, if they don’t actually carry out, a degree of violence in the application of their convictions that is currently unique.”
Ajaz Ashraf, writing at the Indian website First Post, blamed totalitarian regimes in the Muslim world for fostering such violence.
He cited the Qur’an in support of the idea that “words should be used against words and cartoons against cartoons, not bullets and bombs”. But he said despotic rulers sought to impose their own reading of the sacred text as they crushed opposition, while their opponents interpreted it to justify their militant opposition.
“Since the sociopolitical context in which the contest for defining Islam isn’t democratic, the actors in the drama have sought to violently impose their version of ‘true Islam’ on people, demanding their adherence under duress,” Ashraf wrote.
Nicholas Kristof in the New York Times pointed out: “The vast majority of Muslims of course have nothing to do with the insanity of such attacks – except that they are disproportionately the victims of terrorism.”
He noted that Wednesday’s most lethal terror attack was a car bomb outside a police college in Yemen, possibly planted by a group affiliated to al-Qaida, which killed at least 37 people.



 Facebook 
 Twitter 
 Pinterest 
  expand 


A woman, left, holds a sign reading ‘Je suis Charlie’ (I am Charlie) while another holds a newspaper reading ‘They won’t kill freedom’ in front of the Eiffel tower.
Photograph: Bertrand Guay/AFP/Getty Images


In Britain, the Sun focused on what should come next. In an editorial it called for an aggressive response to terrorists who “cannot be understood. Only condemned, protected against and fought.
“Intelligence, including the use of the RIPA anti-terror law for its intended purpose, is our best defence. Yet liberals still fret over the perceived assault on civil liberties of spooks analysing emails.
“Yesterday Paris experienced a REAL assault on their liberty: maniacs machine-gunning cartoonists.”
It also said it was crucial for allied ground forces to tackle Islamic State (Isis) in Iraq and Syria and that moderate Muslims should expose and combat extremism.
“They must steer their kids away from the evil, insane idea that Allah wants them to kill in his name. They must teach them too that free speech is a cornerstone of our democracy,” the Sun said.
In China – where the vast majority of those commenting on microblogs and websites condemned the attack – Song Luzheng of the Chunqiu Institute, which has been highly critical of the west, questioned whether Charlie Hebdo should have been allowed to publish such material.
“In hindsight, such press freedom not only does not help solving conflicts between different races, it aggravates them. Beside, does press freedom include the freedom to offend other people’s belief? From this point of view, it’s a bless for our nation that China does not have such press freedom.”
In an editorial, the nationalist Global Times said: “Many Muslims living in the west are aggrieved at not being respected and trusted and some western media satirise the prophet – westerners think it’s ‘free speech’ and some people regard guarding this freedom an act of upholding western values … Western politicians, more often than not, for the sake of winning votes, are reluctant to persuade the media to be more restrained.”
It added that western society was not very alert to the need to avoid over-simplifying inevitable conflicts as religious or racial in a diverse society, leading to their escalation.
But Hu Xijin, the editor of the Global Times, added on his microblog: “We should have more sympathy for Paris. Nobody should publicly display their gloating … All terrorism has ‘deep-rooted reasons’, but however many these reasons are, they are not the fundamental cause of this event. The west should reflect on itself, but the condemnation of the attackers should be unconditional.”
Elsewhere, people asked what future free speech and satire had following the attacks.
“Though the self-righteous have killed the satirists they will never annihilate satire itself … From now on, Charlie Hebdo will be the rallying point for all those who cherish life and laughter over the death-cult of sanctimonious gloom,” wrote the historian Simon Schama in the Financial Times (subscription).
“Just because the unhinged perpetrators are murderers does not mean they are not also clowns.”
But Amos Biderman, cartoonist for Israel’s Haaretz newspaper, was profoundly pessimistic (subscription).
“The bad guys have won – those guys from the Islamic Jihad, al-Qaida, the Islamic State, whatever you want to call them. They’ve beaten us big time in the battle for freedom of expression,” he wrote.
“Now there is no cartoonist or publisher who would dare start up with them. They’re all trembling in fear. Personally, I’ve felt threatened ever since the storm over the Danish cartoons depicting Muhammad in 2005. I don’t go near the subject.”
Joe Randazzo, former editor of the Onion, urged people not to be cowed in a commentary for MSNBC. “You cannot kill an idea by murdering innocent people – though you can nudge it toward suicide. That is the real threat: that we’ll allow our fear, or our anger, to kill ourselves,” he wrote.



Topics



Charlie Hebdo attack




Freedom of speech




France




China




Newspapers



More…



Europe




Newspapers & magazines




Asia Pacific








Share on Facebook







Share on Twitter







Share via Email







Share on LinkedIn







Share on Google+







Share on WhatsApp



















 






more on this story














Cherif Kouachi during 2008 terror trial: 'I've been set up' - video

File footage of one of the Paris gunmen, Cherif Kouachi, arriving at court in 2008 on charges of helping to funnel fighters to Iraq's insurgency



Published: 13 Jan 2015




Cherif Kouachi during 2008 terror trial: 'I've been set up' - video












Analysis Charlie Hebdo attackers: born, raised and radicalised in Paris

The radicalisation of the Kouachi brothers began in a picturesque park in the capital while Amédy Coulibaly took the first steps towards terrorism in prison, but what the three had in common was growing up on the margins of French society



Published: 12 Jan 2015




Charlie Hebdo attackers: born, raised and radicalised in Paris












Paris shootings: investigation launched into where gunmen got GoPro cameras

Officials try to pinpoint when and where cameras found in possession of Kouachi brothers and Amédy Coulibaly were obtained



Published: 12 Jan 2015




Paris shootings: investigation launched into where gunmen got GoPro cameras












Paris attacks: 10,000 troops deployed as France hunts for accomplices

Mobilisation of 10,000 troops to guard potentially vulnerable locations comes as prime minister warns that ‘threat still present’



Published: 12 Jan 2015




Paris attacks: 10,000 troops deployed as France hunts for accomplices














Paris shootings: Jewish school ‘likely target’ of gunman Coulibaly




Published: 12 Jan 2015




Paris shootings: Jewish school ‘likely target’ of gunman Coulibaly








Analysis Mentor of Charlie Hebdo gunmen has been UK-based




Published: 11 Jan 2015




Mentor of Charlie Hebdo gunmen has been UK-based








Paris gunman Amedy Coulibaly declared allegiance to Isis




Published: 11 Jan 2015




Paris gunman Amedy Coulibaly declared allegiance to Isis








Charlie Hebdo: a letter to my British friends

Olivier Tonneau




Published: 13 Jan 2015




Charlie Hebdo: a letter to my British friends
















popular












 








The Guardian






back to top














home




US




world
selected




opinion




sports




soccer




tech




arts




lifestyle




fashion




business




money




travel




environment







all sections
close







home




US




world
selected




UK




europe




americas




asia




middle east




africa




australia






opinion




sports




soccer




MLS




NFL




MLB




NBA




NHL






soccer




live scores




tables




competitions




results




fixtures




clubs






tech




games






arts




movies




tv & radio




music




books




art & design




stage




classical






lifestyle




food




health




love & sex




family




women




home & garden






fashion




business




markets




companies






money




travel




USA




europe




UK






environment




development




cities






science




media




crosswords




video











World




›
Charlie Hebdo attack








jobs

subscribe
all topics
all contributors

info and resources

contact us

feedback

complaints & corrections
terms & conditions
privacy policy
cookie policy
securedrop


© 2015 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved.






















 
