Charlie Hebdo killings condemned by Arab states – but hailed online by extremists | World news | The GuardianCharlie Hebdo killings condemned by Arab states – but hailed online by extremists | World news | The Guardian










Close






Skip to main content

 









sign in








subscribe









search




jobs






more


from the guardian:


jobs


change edition:



switch to the UK edition


switch to the AU edition







US edition




switch to the UK edition




switch to the Australia edition













The Guardian


Winner of the Pulitzer prize











home


›
world


›
europe




americas


asia


middle east


africa


australia


UK










home




US




world
selected




opinion




sports




soccer




tech




arts




lifestyle




fashion




business




money




travel




environment







browse all sections
close







 











Charlie Hebdo attack



Charlie Hebdo killings condemned by Arab states – but hailed online by extremists









Supporters of Isis praise attack, but many Arabic Twitter users point out magazine also satirised Jews, Christians and Buddhists
Charlie Hebdo attack: follow the latest developments














A man holds a placard which reads ‘I am Charlie’ to pay tribute during a gathering at the Place de la Republique in Paris. Photograph: Christian Hartmann/Reuters




Ian Black, Middle East editor


Wednesday 7 January 2015 14.30 EST







Share on Facebook







Share on Twitter







Share via Email







Share on LinkedIn







Share on Google+







Share on WhatsApp
















Arab governments and Muslim leaders and organisations across the world have condemned the deadly attack in Paris, but it was praised by jihadi sympathisers who hailed it as “revenge” against those who had “insulted” the prophet Muhammad.
Saudi Arabia called it a “cowardly terrorist attack that was rejected by the true Islamic religion”. The Arab League and Egypt’s al-Azhar university – the leading theological institution in the Sunni Muslim world – also denounced the incident in which masked gunmen shouted “Allahu Akbar” – “god is great ” in Arabic.
Iran, Jordan, Bahrain, Morocco, Algeria and Qatar all issued similar statements.
No organisation claimed responsibility for the attack but supporters of the Islamic State (Isis), the militant organisation that now controls large parts of Iraq and Syria, welcomed it on social media, using Arabic language hashtags including “our revenge for the messenger (Muhammad)”, “Paris is Burning”, “Paris under Fire” and the “Lions of Tawheed [monotheism]”.
One Twitter user, apparently an Isis supporter, said: “This is the first reaction. You’ll not live in safety again.” Another described the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo as a Zionist newspaper.
“This proves that the Islamic State can strike deep in Europe whenever it wishes,” said another. A graphic posted by Abu Sari al-Iraqi showed the black flag of Isis flying over the Eiffel Tower, with the slogan in French: “We are everywhere.”
Reuters quoted an Isis fighter named Abu Mussab as saying: “The lions of Islam have avenged our prophet. Let these crusaders be scared because they should be.”
Many Arabic Twitter users, however, attacked the terrorists, one pointing out that Charlie Hebdo had made fun of Jews, Christians and Buddhists without its journalists being targeted and murdered.
The Union des Organisations Islamiques de France, which represents more than 250 Muslim organisations across the country, condemned the killings. Tariq Ramadan, a leading Muslim thinker, commented: “It is not the prophet who was avenged, it is our religion, our values and Islamic principles that have been betrayed and tainted.” The Muslim Council of Britain said: ”Whatever the cause may be, nothing justifies the taking of life.”
Other Muslims said they would only condemn the Paris attack if France condemned the killings of Muslims worldwide.
Charlie Hebdo has long been controversial because of the cartoons it has published portraying the prophet Muhammad, some in pornographic poses.
Observant Muslims anywhere would be angered by such images and that is especially true of fundamentalist Salafis, who adhere to traditions laid down in 7th-century Arabia, or of the small minority who hold to the jihadi-takfiri world view espoused by Isis and al-Qaida.
Their doctrines permit the killing of so-called apostates. But devout Sunni Muslims of all stripes avoid visual depictions of Muhammad or other prophets such as Moses or Abraham.
Islam is not unique. Judaism forbids the use of “graven images” and Christianity has at times frowned on visual representations of sacred figures, allowing only the cross to be depicted in churches.
The Qur’an does not explicitly forbid images of Muhammad, but several hadith (sayings and actions attributed to the prophet) prohibit Muslims from creating visual depictions of human figures. Traditionally, the concern has been that images may encourage idolatry, the scourge of the jahiliyya period of pre-Islamic Arabia.
The most common visual representation of the prophet Muhammad in Islamic art is by elaborate swirling Arabic calligraphy. The Qur’an is never illustrated.
The destruction by the Taliban in Afghanistan of statues of Buddha in Bamyan is a notorious example of the intolerance of images, part of the school of tawhid – Islamic monotheism. Sunni disapproval of Shia Muslim shrines reflects this too. Shias are more flexible than Sunnis and display images of Husayn, the grandson of Muhammad.
The differences between the two main branches of Islam are often compared to those between Protestants and Catholics in the Christian world. Isis in Iraq has demolished shrines to Sunni or Sufi figures, while Shia mosques have also been destroyed – hence the Iraqi Shia militiamen and Iranian Revolutionary Guards protecting the revered Sayyida Zeinab shrine in the Syrian capital, Damascus.
In a cartoon published just before the killings, Charlie Hebdo portrayed the Isis leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, apparently based on a photograph of him preaching in a mosque after the capture of the Iraqi city of Mosul last June and his proclamation of a new caliphate. It sarcastically wished him “especially good health”.
Last October, it ran an image that portrayed Isis as being opposed to Islam by displaying an image of a masked man cutting the throat of his kneeling, turbanned victim, who is saying: “I am the prophet, you brute.” The killer replies: “Shut your mouth, you infidel.” The cartoon was captioned: “If Muhammad returned …”
In November 2010, the magazine’s office was hit by a firebomb and its website hacked after it announced plans for an edition with Muhammad as its chief editor, and the title page with a cartoon of him was posted on social media.



Topics



Charlie Hebdo attack




Islamic State (Isis)




France




Europe




Islam



More…



Religion








Share on Facebook







Share on Twitter







Share via Email







Share on LinkedIn







Share on Google+







Share on WhatsApp



















 






related content












popular












 








The Guardian






back to top














home




US




world
selected




opinion




sports




soccer




tech




arts




lifestyle




fashion




business




money




travel




environment







all sections
close







home




US




world
selected




UK




europe




americas




asia




middle east




africa




australia






opinion




sports




soccer




MLS




NFL




MLB




NBA




NHL






soccer




live scores




tables




competitions




results




fixtures




clubs






tech




games






arts




movies




tv & radio




music




books




art & design




stage




classical






lifestyle




food




health




love & sex




family




women




home & garden






fashion




business




markets




companies






money




travel




USA




europe




UK






environment




development




cities






science




media




crosswords




video











World




›
Charlie Hebdo attack








jobs

subscribe
all topics
all contributors

info and resources

contact us

feedback

complaints & corrections
terms & conditions
privacy policy
cookie policy
securedrop


© 2015 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved.






















 
