Scholarly Works, Chemical Engineering

Permanent URI for this collection

https://hdl.handle.net/10919/24288
Research articles, presentations, and other scholarship

Browse

Browsing Scholarly Works, Chemical Engineering by Author "Afrose, Sharmin"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Subpopulation-specific machine learning prognosis for underrepresented patients with double prioritized bias correction
    Afrose, Sharmin; Song, Wenjia; Nemeroff, Charles B.; Yao, Danfeng (Nature Research, 2022-09)
    Background: Many clinical datasets are intrinsically imbalanced, dominated by overwhelming majority groups. Off-the-shelf machine learning models that optimize the prognosis of majority patient types (e.g., healthy class) may cause substantial errors on the minority prediction class (e.g., disease class) and demographic subgroups (e.g., Black or young patients). In the typical one-machine-learning-model-fits-all paradigm, racial and age disparities are likely to exist, but unreported. In addition, some widely used whole-population metrics give misleading results. Methods: We design a double prioritized (DP) bias correction technique to mitigate representational biases in machine learning-based prognosis. Our method trains customized machine learning models for specific ethnicity or age groups, a substantial departure from the one-model-predicts-all convention. We compare with other sampling and reweighting techniques in mortality and cancer survivability prediction tasks. Results: We first provide empirical evidence showing various prediction deficiencies in a typical machine learning setting without bias correction. For example, missed death cases are 3.14 times higher than missed survival cases for mortality prediction. Then, we show DP consistently boosts the minority class recall for underrepresented groups, by up to 38.0%. DP also reduces relative disparities across race and age groups, e.g., up to 88.0% better than the 8 existing sampling solutions in terms of the relative disparity of minority class recall. Crossrace and cross-age-group evaluation also suggests the need for subpopulation-specific machine learning models. Conclusions: Biases exist in the widely accepted one-machine-learning-model-fits-all-population approach. We invent a bias correction method that produces specialized machine learning prognostication models for underrepresented racial and age groups. This technique may reduce potentially life-threatening prediction mistakes for minority populations.