Browsing by Author "Laomettachit, Teeraphan"
Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- A continuous-time stochastic Boolean model provides a quantitative description of the budding yeast cell cycleLaomettachit, Teeraphan; Kraikivski, Pavel; Tyson, John J. (Springer Nature, 2022-12-01)The cell division cycle is regulated by a complex network of interacting genes and proteins. The control system has been modeled in many ways, from qualitative Boolean switching-networks to quantitative differential equations and highly detailed stochastic simulations. Here we develop a continuous-time stochastic model using seven Boolean variables to represent the activities of major regulators of the budding yeast cell cycle plus one continuous variable representing cell growth. The Boolean variables are updated asynchronously by logical rules based on known biochemistry of the cell-cycle control system using Gillespie’s stochastic simulation algorithm. Time and cell size are updated continuously. By simulating a population of yeast cells, we calculate statistical properties of cell cycle progression that can be compared directly to experimental measurements. Perturbations of the normal sequence of events indicate that the cell cycle is 91% robust to random ‘flips’ of the Boolean variables, but 9% of the perturbations induce lethal mistakes in cell cycle progression. This simple, hybrid Boolean model gives a good account of the growth and division of budding yeast cells, suggesting that this modeling approach may be as accurate as detailed reaction-kinetic modeling with considerably less demands on estimating rate constants.
- Mathematical modeling approaches for dynamical analysis of protein regulatory networks with applications to the budding yeast cell cycle and the circadian rhythm in cyanobacteriaLaomettachit, Teeraphan (Virginia Tech, 2011-10-24)Mathematical modeling has become increasingly popular as a tool to study regulatory interactions within gene-protein networks. From the modeler's perspective, two challenges arise in the process of building a mathematical model. First, the same regulatory network can be translated into different types of models at different levels of detail, and the modeler must choose an appropriate level to describe the network. Second, realistic regulatory networks are complicated due to the large number of biochemical species and interactions that govern any physiological process. Constructing and validating a realistic mathematical model of such a network can be a difficult and lengthy task. To confront the first challenge, we develop a new modeling approach that classifies components in the networks into three classes of variables, which are described by different rate laws. These three classes serve as "building blocks" that can be connected to build a complex regulatory network. We show that our approach combines the best features of different types of models, and we demonstrate its utility by applying it to the budding yeast cell cycle. To confront the second challenge, modelers have developed rule-based modeling as a framework to build complex mathematical models. In this approach, the modeler describes a set of rules that instructs the computer to automatically generate all possible chemical reactions in the network. Building a mathematical model using rule-based modeling is not only less time-consuming and error-prone, but also allows modelers to account comprehensively for many different mechanistic details of a molecular regulatory system. We demonstrate the potential of rule-based modeling by applying it to the generation of circadian rhythms in cyanobacteria.
- A Model of Yeast Cell-Cycle Regulation Based on a Standard Component Modeling Strategy for Protein Regulatory NetworksLaomettachit, Teeraphan; Chen, Katherine C.; Baumann, William T.; Tyson, John J. (PLOS, 2016-05-17)To understand the molecular mechanisms that regulate cell cycle progression in eukaryotes, a variety of mathematical modeling approaches have been employed, ranging from Boolean networks and differential equations to stochastic simulations. Each approach has its own characteristic strengths and weaknesses. In this paper, we propose a “standard component” modeling strategy that combines advantageous features of Boolean networks, differential equations and stochastic simulations in a framework that acknowledges the typical sorts of reactions found in protein regulatory networks. Applying this strategy to a comprehensive mechanism of the budding yeast cell cycle, we illustrate the potential value of standard component modeling. The deterministic version of our model reproduces the phenotypic properties of wild-type cells and of 125 mutant strains. The stochastic version of our model reproduces the cell-to-cell variability of wild-type cells and the partial viability of the CLB2-dbΔ clb5Δ mutant strain. Our simulations show that mathematical modeling with “standard components” can capture in quantitative detail many essential properties of cell cycle control in budding yeast.
- Optimization and model reduction in the high dimensional parameter space of a budding yeast cell cycle modelOguz, Cihan; Laomettachit, Teeraphan; Chen, Katherine C.; Watson, Layne T.; Baumann, William T.; Tyson, John J. (Biomed Central, 2013-06-28)Background 'Parameter estimation from experimental data is critical for mathematical modeling of protein regulatory networks. For realistic networks with dozens of species and reactions, parameter estimation is an especially challenging task. In this study, we present an approach for parameter estimation that is effective in fitting a model of the budding yeast cell cycle (comprising 26 nonlinear ordinary differential equations containing 126 rate constants) to the experimentally observed phenotypes (viable or inviable) of 119 genetic strains carrying mutations of cell cycle genes. Results Starting from an initial guess of the parameter values, which correctly captures the phenotypes of only 72 genetic strains, our parameter estimation algorithm quickly improves the success rate of the model to 105-111 of the 119 strains. This success rate is comparable to the best values achieved by a skilled modeler manually choosing parameters over many weeks. The algorithm combines two search and optimization strategies. First, we use Latin hypercube sampling to explore a region surrounding the initial guess. From these samples, we choose ∼20 different sets of parameter values that correctly capture wild type viability. These sets form the starting generation of differential evolution that selects new parameter values that perform better in terms of their success rate in capturing phenotypes. In addition to producing highly successful combinations of parameter values, we analyze the results to determine the parameters that are most critical for matching experimental outcomes and the most competitive strains whose correct outcome with a given parameter vector forces numerous other strains to have incorrect outcomes. These “most critical parameters” and “most competitive strains” provide biological insights into the model. Conversely, the “least critical parameters” and “least competitive strains” suggest ways to reduce the computational complexity of the optimization. Conclusions Our approach proves to be a useful tool to help systems biologists fit complex dynamical models to large experimental datasets. In the process of fitting the model to the data, the tool identifies suggestive correlations among aspects of the model and the data.
- A Stochastic Model Correctly Predicts Changes in Budding Yeast Cell Cycle Dynamics upon Periodic Expression of CLN2Oguz, Cihan; Palmisano, Alida; Laomettachit, Teeraphan; Watson, Layne T.; Baumann, William T.; Tyson, John J. (PLOS, 2014-05-09)In this study, we focus on a recent stochastic budding yeast cell cycle model. First, we estimate the model parameters using extensive data sets: phenotypes of 110 genetic strains, single cell statistics of wild type and cln3 strains. Optimization of stochastic model parameters is achieved by an automated algorithm we recently used for a deterministic cell cycle model. Next, in order to test the predictive ability of the stochastic model, we focus on a recent experimental study in which forced periodic expression of CLN2 cyclin (driven by MET3 promoter in cln3 background) has been used to synchronize budding yeast cell colonies. We demonstrate that the model correctly predicts the experimentally observed synchronization levels and cell cycle statistics of mother and daughter cells under various experimental conditions (numerical data that is not enforced in parameter optimization), in addition to correctly predicting the qualitative changes in size control due to forced CLN2 expression. Our model also generates a novel prediction: under frequent CLN2 expression pulses, G1 phase duration is bimodal among small-born cells. These cells originate from daughters with extended budded periods due to size control during the budded period. This novel prediction and the experimental trends captured by the model illustrate the interplay between cell cycle dynamics, synchronization of cell colonies, and size control in budding yeast.