Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBayat, Mahmouden
dc.contributor.authorBurkhart, Harolden
dc.contributor.authorNamiranian, Manouchehren
dc.contributor.authorHamidi, Seyedeh Kosaren
dc.contributor.authorHeidari, Saharen
dc.contributor.authorHassani, Majiden
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-26T12:22:40Zen
dc.date.available2021-04-26T12:22:40Zen
dc.date.issued2021-04-10en
dc.identifier.citationBayat, M.; Burkhart, H.; Namiranian, M.; Hamidi, S.K.; Heidari, S.; Hassani, M. Assessing Biotic and Abiotic Effects on Biodiversity Index Using Machine Learning. Forests 2021, 12, 461.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/103110en
dc.description.abstractForest ecosystems play multiple important roles in meeting the habitat needs of different organisms and providing a variety of services to humans. Biodiversity is one of the structural features in dynamic and complex forest ecosystems. One of the most challenging issues in assessing forest ecosystems is understanding the relationship between biodiversity and environmental factors. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of biotic and abiotic factors on tree diversity of Hyrcanian forests in northern Iran. For this purpose, we analyzed tree diversity in 8 forest sites in different locations from east to west of the Caspian Sea. 15,988 trees were measured in 655 circular permanent sample plots (0.1 ha). A combination of machine learning methods was used for modeling and investigating the relationship between tree diversity and biotic and abiotic factors. Machine learning models included generalized additive models (GAMs), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF) and K-nearest–neighbor (KNN). To determine the most important factors related to tree diversity we used from variables such as the average diameter at breast height (DBH) in the plot, basal area in largest trees (BAL), basal area (BA), number of trees per hectare, tree species, slope, aspect and elevation. A comparison of RMSEs, relative RMSEs, and the coefficients of determination of the different methods, showed that the random forest (RF) method resulted in the best models among all those tested. Based on the results of the RF method, elevation, BA and BAL were recognized as the most influential factors defining variation of tree diversity.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherMDPIen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.titleAssessing Biotic and Abiotic Effects on Biodiversity Index Using Machine Learningen
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden
dc.date.updated2021-04-23T13:31:21Zen
dc.description.versionPublished versionen
dc.contributor.departmentForest Resources and Environmental Conservationen
dc.title.serialForestsen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/f12040461en
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten
dc.type.dcmitypeStillImageen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International