Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDienlin, Tobiasen
dc.contributor.authorJohannes, Niklasen
dc.contributor.authorBowman, Nicholas Daviden
dc.contributor.authorMasur, Philipp K.en
dc.contributor.authorEngesser, Svenen
dc.contributor.authorKümpel, Anna Sophieen
dc.contributor.authorLukito, Josephineen
dc.contributor.authorBier, Lindsey M.en
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Renwenen
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Benjamin K.en
dc.contributor.authorHuskey, Richarden
dc.contributor.authorSchneider, Frank M.en
dc.contributor.authorBreuer, Johannesen
dc.contributor.authorParry, Douglas A.en
dc.contributor.authorVermeulen, Ivaren
dc.contributor.authorFisher, Jacob T.en
dc.contributor.authorBanks, Jaimeen
dc.contributor.authorWeber, Renéen
dc.contributor.authorEllis, David A.en
dc.contributor.authorSmits, Timen
dc.contributor.authorIvory, James Deeen
dc.contributor.authorTrepte, Sabineen
dc.contributor.authorMcEwan, Breeen
dc.contributor.authorRinke, Eike Marken
dc.contributor.authorNeubaum, Germanen
dc.contributor.authorWinter, Stephanen
dc.contributor.authorCarpenter, Christopher J.en
dc.contributor.authorKrämer, Nicoleen
dc.contributor.authorUtz, Sonjaen
dc.contributor.authorUnkel, Julianen
dc.contributor.authorWang, Xiaohuien
dc.contributor.authorDavidson, Brittany I.en
dc.contributor.authorKim, Nurien
dc.contributor.authorWon, Andrea Stevensonen
dc.contributor.authorDomahidi, Emeseen
dc.contributor.authorLewis, Neil A.en
dc.contributor.authorde Vreese, Claesen
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-04T12:27:42Zen
dc.date.available2021-08-04T12:27:42Zen
dc.date.issued2021-02en
dc.identifier.issn0021-9916en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/104564en
dc.description.abstractIn the last 10 years, many canonical findings in the social sciences appear unreliable. This so-called "replication crisis" has spurred calls for open science practices, which aim to increase the reproducibility, replicability, and generalizability of findings. Communication research is subject to many of the same challenges that have caused low replicability in other fields. As a result, we propose an agenda for adopting open science practices in Communication, which includes the following seven suggestions: (1) publish materials, data, and code; (2) preregister studies and submit registered reports; (3) conduct replications; (4) collaborate; (5) foster open science skills; (6) implement Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines; and (7) incentivize open science practices. Although in our agenda we focus mostly on quantitative research, we also reflect on open science practices relevant to qualitative research. We conclude by discussing potential objections and concerns associated with open science practices.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subjectOpen Scienceen
dc.subjectReproducibilityen
dc.subjectReplicabilityen
dc.subjectCommunicationen
dc.subjectPreregistrationen
dc.subjectRegistered Reportsen
dc.titleAn Agenda for Open Science in Communicationen
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden
dc.description.versionPublished versionen
dc.contributor.departmentCommunicationen
dc.title.serialJournal of Communicationen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz052en
dc.identifier.volume71en
dc.identifier.issue1en
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten
dc.type.dcmitypeStillImageen
dc.identifier.eissn1460-2466en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International