VTechWorks staff will be away for the Thanksgiving holiday starting Wednesday afternoon, Nov. 25, through Sunday Nov. 29, and will not be replying to requests during this time. Thank you for your patience.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrown, Anne M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHoopes, Samantha L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWhite, Robert H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSarisky, Catherine A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-26T06:36:58Z
dc.date.available2012-07-26T06:36:58Z
dc.date.issued2011-12-14
dc.identifier.citationBiology Direct. 2011 Dec 14;6(1):63en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/18748
dc.description.abstractBackground The ability to perform de novo biosynthesis of purines is present in organisms in all three domains of life, reflecting the essentiality of these molecules to life. Although the pathway is quite similar in eukaryotes and bacteria, the archaeal pathway is more variable. A careful manual curation of genes in this pathway demonstrates the value of manual curation in archaea, even in pathways that have been well-studied in other domains. Results We searched the Integrated Microbial Genome system (IMG) for the 17 distinct genes involved in the 11 steps of de novo purine biosynthesis in 65 sequenced archaea, finding 738 predicted proteins with sequence similarity to known purine biosynthesis enzymes. Each sequence was manually inspected for the presence of active site residues and other residues known or suspected to be required for function. Many apparently purine-biosynthesizing archaea lack evidence for a single enzyme, either glycinamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase or inosine monophosphate cyclohydrolase, suggesting that there are at least two more gene variants in the purine biosynthetic pathway to discover. Variations in domain arrangement of formylglycinamidine ribonucleotide synthetase and substantial problems in aminoimidazole carboxamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase and inosine monophosphate cyclohydrolase assignments were also identified. Manual curation revealed some overly specific annotations in the IMG gene product name, with predicted proteins without essential active site residues assigned product names implying enzymatic activity (21 proteins, 2.8% of proteins inspected) or Enzyme Commission (E. C.) numbers (57 proteins, 7.7%). There were also 57 proteins (7.7%) assigned overly generic names and 78 proteins (10.6%) without E.C. numbers as part of the assigned name when a specific enzyme name and E. C. number were well-justified. Conclusions The patchy distribution of purine biosynthetic genes in archaea is consistent with a pathway that has been shaped by horizontal gene transfer, duplication, and gene loss. Our results indicate that manual curation can improve upon automated annotation for a small number of automatically-annotated proteins and can reveal a need to identify further pathway components even in well-studied pathways.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.titlePurine Biosynthesis in Archaea: Variations on a Themeen_US
dc.typeArticle - Refereed
dc.date.updated2012-07-26T06:36:58Z
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewed
dc.rights.holderAnne M Brown et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.en
dc.contributor.departmentBiochemistryen_US
dc.title.serialBiology Direct
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-6-63
dc.type.dcmitypeText


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International