Show simple item record

dc.contributorVirginia Tech
dc.contributor.authorSnizek, W. E.
dc.contributor.authorLittle, R. E.
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-05T13:38:18Z
dc.date.available2014-03-05T13:38:18Z
dc.date.issued1984
dc.identifier.citationSnizek, W. E.; Little, R. E. (1984). Accounting for occupational and organizational commitment - a longitudinal reexamination of structural and attitudinal approaches. Sociological Perspectives, 27(2), 181-196. doi: 10.2307/1389017
dc.identifier.issn0731-1214
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/25824
dc.description.abstractUsing longitudinal data collected from a subsample (N = 92) of subjects surveyed five years earlier by Shoemaker et al. (1977), the present study assesses the relative utility of two distinctly different approaches to the study of occupational and organizational commitment. The first is the structural investments or side-bet approach made famous by Becker (1960); the second, the attitudinal or social psychological perspective used by Ritzer and Trice (1969), among others. Based on regression analyses of data, for the two time periods studied and for changes across time, structural variables appear to be slightly better predictors of commitment than do attitudinal variables. Of particular note, however, are the changes in predictive power of each approach, relative to both occupational and organizational commitment, when comparing two distinct stages in the worker career of employees represented by the five-year span of the study.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of California Press
dc.titleaccounting for occupational and organizational commitment - a longitudinal reexamination of structural and attitudinal approaches
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/1389017
dc.date.accessed2014-02-17
dc.title.serialSociological Perspectives
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.2307/1389017


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record