Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKim, Kihyungen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T20:07:03Z
dc.date.available2014-03-14T20:07:03Z
dc.date.issued2008-01-10en_US
dc.identifier.otheretd-02012008-140009en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/26091
dc.description.abstractProton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) are one of the leading candidates in alternative energy conversion devices for transportation, stationary, and portable power generation applications. PEMFC systems with their own fuel conversion unit typically consist of several subsystems: a fuel processing subsystem, a fuel cell stack subsystem, a work recovery-air supply subsystem, and a power electronics subsystem. Since these subsystems have different physical characteristics, their integration into a single system/subsystem level unit make the problems of dynamic system synthesis/design and operation/control highly complex. Typically, the synthesis/design optimization of energy systems is based on a single full load condition at steady state. However, a more comprehensive synthesis/design and operation/control optimization requires taking into account part as well as full load conditions for satisfying an optimal efficiency/cost/environmental effect objective. Optimal couple of these various aspects of system development requires dynamic system/subsystem/component modeling and a multi-disciplinary approach which results in an integrated set of diverse types of models and highly effective optimization strategies such as decomposition techniques (e.g., Dynamic Iterative Local-Global Optimization: DILGO). In energy system synthesis/design and operation/control problems, system/ component models are typically treated deterministically, even though input values, which include the specific load profile for which the system or subsystem is developed, can have significant uncertainties that inevitably propagate through the system to the outputs. This deficiency can be overcome by treating the inputs and outputs probabilistically. In this work, various uncertainty analysis methodologies are applied; and among these traditional probabilistic approaches (e.g., Monte Carlo simulation) and the response sensitivity analysis (RSA) method are examined to determine their applicability to energy system development. In particular, these methods are used for the probabilistic (non-deterministic) modeling, analysis, and optimization of a residential 5 kWe PEMFC system, and uncertainty effects on the energy system synthesis/design and operation/control optimization have been assessed by taking the uncertainties into account in the objectives and constraints. Optimization results show that there is little effect on the objective (the operating cost and capital cost), while the constraints (e.g., on the CO concentration) can be significantly affected during the synthesis/design and operation/control optimization.en_US
dc.publisherVirginia Techen_US
dc.relation.haspartKHKIM_dissertation(5).pdfen_US
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectuncertainty analysisen_US
dc.subjecttrasienten_US
dc.subjectdynamic simulationen_US
dc.subjectPEM fuel cellen_US
dc.subjectoptimizationen_US
dc.titleDynamic Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell System Synthesis/Design and Operation/Control Optimization under Uncertaintyen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.description.degreePh. D.en_US
thesis.degree.namePh. D.en_US
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen_US
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineMechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.committeechairvon Spakovsky, Michael R.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberEllis, Michael W.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberJohnson, Martin E.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberRancruel, Diegoen_US
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-02012008-140009/en_US
dc.contributor.committeecochairNelson, Douglas J.en_US
dc.date.sdate2008-02-01en_US
dc.date.rdate2008-02-26
dc.date.adate2008-02-26en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record