Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKim, Sunhaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T20:21:02Z
dc.date.available2014-03-14T20:21:02Z
dc.date.issued2009-12-07en_US
dc.identifier.otheretd-12212009-212450en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/30217
dc.description.abstractLearning objects have received attention because of their potential to improve current methods of teaching and learning. Despite perceived importance, there has been lack of studies that examine the use of learning objects across various contexts. In response, this study examined the actual use of learning objects and their perceptions among Instructional Design and Technology (IDT) practitioners in U.S. This study was based on the data from 191 IDT practitioners from various sectors, including higher education, business, government, and K-12. The study results contribute to the body of knowledge on learning objects in terms of four areas: conceptualization, utilization, benefits, and adoption. First, the study results should allay the concern that the conceptualization of learning objects focuses too much on technical aspects. IDT practitioners emphasized both technical and learning aspects in conceptualizing learning objects. In conclusion, the present study laid the foundation for a working definition of learning objects. Second, the study showed that IDT practitioners were utilizing learning objects to empower learners to have control over their own learning. The current study identified design strategies that IDT practitioners were frequently using. The most frequently utilized strategy was the provision of concrete, authentic examples and problems. Along with design strategies, this study identified the frequently adopted granularity levels: assets, combined media, one complete instructional unit, lesson or module, and course. Combined media, which consists of content and optional media, was the most frequently utilized granularity level of the five levels. The study provided empirical data to help determine formal design strategies and optimal granularity levels in utilizing learning objects based on the frequent use among IDT practitioners. Third, this study filled the research gap on the benefits of learning objects from an IDT perspective. Study results showed that IDT practitioners were positive about the overall benefits for the ID process, along with reusability and the support for the motivation and interactivity features. However, they were less convinced of the time and cost savings. Generally, IDT practitioners were satisfied with the benefits of learning objects. Fourth, the present study improved the understanding of the adoption status of learning objects. Currently, many of the participantsâ organizations were adopting or exploring the implementation of learning objects. The adoption of learning objects has a promising future, as IDT practitioners were positive about their organizationsâ intentions to use learning objects in the future. At the individual level, IDT practitioners were found to use learning objects for their professional role and across various projects. As an adoption factor, IDT practitioners showed the positive reactions to learning objectsâ perceived usefulness.en_US
dc.publisherVirginia Techen_US
dc.relation.haspartKim_S_D_2009.pdfen_US
dc.rightsI hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to Virginia Tech or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.en_US
dc.subjectconceptsen_US
dc.subjectbenefitsen_US
dc.subjectgranularityen_US
dc.subjectdesign strategiesen_US
dc.subjectadoption statusen_US
dc.subjectlearning objectsen_US
dc.subjectIDT professionalsen_US
dc.titleThe Conceptualization, Utilization, Benefts and Adoption of Learning Objectsen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US
dc.contributor.departmentCurriculum and Instructionen_US
dc.description.degreePh. D.en_US
thesis.degree.namePh. D.en_US
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen_US
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineCurriculum and Instructionen_US
dc.contributor.committeechairLockee, Barbara B.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberBurton, John K.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberPotter, Kenneth R.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberBrill, Jennifer M.en_US
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-12212009-212450/en_US
dc.date.sdate2009-12-21en_US
dc.date.rdate2010-01-22
dc.date.adate2010-01-22en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record