Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPuckett, M. Kristenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T20:39:27Z
dc.date.available2014-03-14T20:39:27Z
dc.date.issued2009-05-05en_US
dc.identifier.otheretd-06052009-163456en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/33441
dc.description.abstractHistoric preservation commissions are required to review proposals of infill within historic districts. Often, this process is viewed as something that stifles an architect. What can an architect to do to both comply with the preservationists wishes and fulfill their clients desires to have an innovative new construction? An architect must look past the prescribed ways of satisfying preservation commissions requirements and fully interpret the process.en_US
dc.publisherVirginia Techen_US
dc.relation.haspartThesisBookmkp.pdfen_US
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectopeningen_US
dc.subjectlighten_US
dc.subjectshadowen_US
dc.subjectwallen_US
dc.subjecthouseen_US
dc.subjecthistoric districten_US
dc.titleA New Form In A Historic Districten_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentArchitectureen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Architectureen_US
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Architectureen_US
thesis.degree.levelmastersen_US
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineArchitectureen_US
dc.contributor.committeechairRott, Hans Christianen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberThompson, Steven Rossen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberEgger, Dayton Eugeneen_US
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-06052009-163456/en_US
dc.date.sdate2009-06-05en_US
dc.date.rdate2009-06-30
dc.date.adate2009-06-30en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record