Virginia Tech
    • Log in
    View Item 
    •   VTechWorks Home
    • ETDs: Virginia Tech Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • Doctoral Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   VTechWorks Home
    • ETDs: Virginia Tech Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • Doctoral Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Interference interactions in experimental pine-hardwood stands

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    LD5655.V856_1991.F745.pdf (6.219Mb)
    Downloads: 184
    Date
    1991-12-15
    Author
    Fredericksen, Todd Simon
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Competition for resources and other interference from non-crop vegetation often limits the productivity of pine and pine-hardwood forest stands in the southern United States. However, forest researchers have yet to fully quantify the effect of this interference on forest tree yield and there is an incomplete understanding of the biological mechanisms of interference. To better quantify the effects of interference interactions and elucidate their mechanisms, a field replacement series experiment and two supporting greenhouse experiments were carried out using loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.), red maple (Acer rubrum L.), black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.), and herbaceous vegetation. Interference between pine. hardwood species, and herbaceous vegetation significantly impacted the growth and yield of young experimental pine-hardwood stands. While herbaceous vegetation significantly affected all stands. it reduced the yield of hardwood species more than loblolly pine. Loblolly pine appeared to ameliorate the effect of herbaceous vegetation on hardwoods in some stands. Interference outcomes were site- and scale-dependent. In field stands, synergistic adjustment in total yield due to pine-hardwood interference was not observed, except for loblolly pine-black locust mixtures on lower site quality replicates. Hardwood species suppressed the growth of pine in seedling stands planted at very close spacing in greenhouse boxes, while the yield at age three of less densely-planted field stands was positively related to the proportion of pine in the stand. Close spacing increased the ability of wide-spreading hardwood crowns to overtop and restrict light availability to conically-shaped pine crowns. Interference outcomes were related to the interactive effect of light, soil moisture, and soil nitrogen resources on tree growth and competitive ability. If not overtopped by hardwoods, loblolly pine had high yields in mixtures with hardwoods and competed effectively for soil moisture and nitrogen through efficient use of these resources. Changes in allometric relationships were observed for tree species in response to interference including root-shoot ratios, crown dimensions, and specific leaf areas. Tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.), the principal herbaceous species in the field study, appeared to affect the physiology and yield of all species through allelopathy in a greenhouse experiment. suggesting that reduced yield in herbaceous plots may be due to direct chemical effects in addition to resource competition.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10919/38901
    Collections
    • Doctoral Dissertations [14863]

    If you believe that any material in VTechWorks should be removed, please see our policy and procedure for Requesting that Material be Amended or Removed. All takedown requests will be promptly acknowledged and investigated.

    Virginia Tech | University Libraries | Contact Us
     

     

    VTechWorks

    AboutPoliciesHelp

    Browse

    All of VTechWorksCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Log inRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    If you believe that any material in VTechWorks should be removed, please see our policy and procedure for Requesting that Material be Amended or Removed. All takedown requests will be promptly acknowledged and investigated.

    Virginia Tech | University Libraries | Contact Us