A two year study was conducted to measure the impact of tobacco aphid, Myzus nicotianae Blackman, colonization and cumulative aphid-days on flue-cured tobacco, Nicotiana tabacum (L.). The objectives of the study included quantifying the response of tobacco production variables, cured leaf quality, and cured leaf chemical analysis to the level of cumulative aphid-days. Aphid populations and tobacco plant responses were recorded on an individual plant basis. A gradient in cumulative aphid-days was obtained through the use of temporally distributed aphid colonizations and selective insecticide use.

Tobacco aphid populations resulted in yield reductions as great as 22 and 27% in 1988 and 1989, respectively, while gross economic returns were reduced 27 and 32% in the respective years. The responses of tobacco production variables were characterized by a decreasing negative slope; therefore, incremental losses were greatest at low levels of cumulative aphid-days. Regression models were developed to describe crop production responses as a function of cumulative aphiddays. The quality of the cured leaves (grade index) was also responsive to the level of cumulative aphid-days. Changes in both tobacco grade group and quality within a given group occurred with increasing cumulative aphid-days. The occurrence of nondescript tobacco was associated with large aphid populations. The chemical quality of the cured tobacco was also influenced by cumulative aphid-days. The total alkaloid content followed a linear function, while the level of reducing sugars was a nonlinear relationship with cumulative aphid-days. The study also reported on the disproportionate impact of aphid populations upon the within-plant responses of tobacco.

A study was conducted to evaluate the impact of tobacco aphid management using eight different action thresholds. Comparison of the two most commonly recommended treatment thresholds (10 and 20% of plants with 50 or more aphids per leaf) revealed no significant differences in the number of remedial treatments required or the yield and gross economic returns. However, use of the latter threshold resulted in a delay of approximately one week for the first treatment and the retreatment interval.