VTechWorks staff will be away for the Thanksgiving holiday starting Wednesday afternoon, Nov. 25, through Sunday Nov. 29, and will not be replying to requests during this time. Thank you for your patience.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPeduzzi, Aliciaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T21:19:13Z
dc.date.available2014-03-14T21:19:13Z
dc.date.issued2011-09-08en_US
dc.identifier.otheretd-09212011-111857en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/39456
dc.description.abstractThe overall objectives of this dissertation were to (1) determine whether leaf area index (LAI) (Chapter 2), as well as stem density and height to live crown (Chapter 3) can be estimated accurately in intensively managed pine plantations using small-footprint, multiple-return airborne laser scanner (lidar) data, and (2) ascertain whether leaf area index in temperate mixed forests is best estimated using multiple-return airborne laser scanning (lidar) data or dual-band, single-pass interferometric synthetic aperture radar data (from GeoSAR) alone or both in combination (Chapter 4). In situ measurements of LAI, mean height, height to live crown, and stem density were made on 109 (LAI) or 110 plots (all other variables) under a variety of stand conditions. Lidar distributional metrics were calculated for each plot as a whole as well as for crown density slices (newly introduced in this dissertation). These metrics were used as independent variables in best subsets regressions with LAI, number of trees, mean height to live crown, and mean height (measured in situ) as the dependent variables. The best resulting model for LAI in pine plantations had an R2 of 0.83 and a cross-validation (CV) RMSE of 0.5. The CV-RMSE for estimating number of trees on all 110 plots was 11.8 with an R2 of 0.92. Mean height to live crown was also well-predicted (R2 = 0.96, CV-RMSE = 0.8 m) with a one-variable model. In situ measurements of temperate mixed forest LAI were made on 61 plots (21 hardwood, 36 pine, 4 mixed pine hardwood). GeoSAR metrics were calculated from the X-band backscatter coefficients (four looks) as well as both X- and P-band interferometric heights and magnitudes. Both lidar and GeoSAR metrics were used as independent variables in best subsets regressions with LAI (measured in situ) as the dependent variable. Lidar metrics alone explained 69% of the variability in temperate mixed forest LAI, while GeoSAR metrics alone explained 52%. However, combining the LAI and GeoSAR metrics increased the R2 to 0.77 with a CV-RMSE of 0.42. Analysis of data from active sensors shows strong potential for eventual operational estimation of biophysical parameters essential to silviculture.en_US
dc.publisherVirginia Techen_US
dc.relation.haspartPeduzzi_A_D_2011.pdfen_US
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectleaf area indexen_US
dc.subjectstem densityen_US
dc.subjectheight to live crownen_US
dc.subjectforest mensurationen_US
dc.subjectremote sensingen_US
dc.titleEstimating forest attributes using laser scanning data and dual-band, single-pass interferometric aperture radar to improve forest managementen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US
dc.contributor.departmentForestryen_US
dc.description.degreePh. D.en_US
thesis.degree.namePh. D.en_US
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen_US
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineForestryen_US
dc.contributor.committeechairWynne, Randolph H.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberNelson, Ross F.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberThomas, Valerie A.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberFox, Thomas R.en_US
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-09212011-111857/en_US
dc.date.sdate2011-09-21en_US
dc.date.rdate2012-09-27
dc.date.adate2011-09-27en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record