Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPriyadarshi, Samareshen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T21:23:56Z
dc.date.available2014-03-14T21:23:56Z
dc.date.issued1997-05-02en_US
dc.identifier.otheretd-8497-93558en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/40526
dc.description.abstract

This dissertation empirically examines refunding decisions employed by issuers of tax-exempt bonds. Callable bonds contain embedded call options by virtue of provisions in bond indentures that permit the issuing firm to buy back the bond at a predetermined strike price. Such an embedded American call option has two components to its value, the intrinsic value and the time value. The issuer can realize at least as much as the intrinsic value by exercising immediately, when the option is in-the-money. Usually it is optimal for the holder of an in-the money American option to wait rather than exercise immediately, because the option has time value. It is rational for the holder to exercise the option when the total value of the option is no more than the intrinsic value. Option pricing theory can be used to identify two sub-optimal refunding strategies: those that refund too early, and those that refund too late. In such cases the holder incurs losses.

I analyze the refunding decisions for two different samples of tax-exempt bonds issued between 1986 and 1993: the first consists of 2,620 bonds that are called, and the second contains 23,976 bonds that are never called. The generalized Vasicek (1977) model in the Heath, Jarrow, and Morton (1992) framework is used to construct binomial trees for interest rates, bond prices, and call option prices. The option pricing lattice is then used to compute the loss in value from sub-optimal refunding strategies, refunding efficiency, and months from optimal time for bonds in these two samples.

Results suggest that sub-optimal refunding decisions cause losses to the issuers, which are present across bond and issuer characteristics. For the pooled sample of 26,596 bonds, the loss in value from sub-optimal refunding decisions totaled $7.2 billion, amounting to a loss of about 1.75% of total principal amount. Results indicate that issuers either wait too long to refund or never refund and cannot realize the present value saving of switching a high coupon bond with a low coupon bond, over a longer period of time. These results critically depend on the assumptions of underlying term structure model and are sensitive to model calibrated parameter values.

 

en_US
dc.publisherVirginia Techen_US
dc.relation.haspartETD.PDFen_US
dc.rightsI hereby grant to Virginia Tech or its agents the right to archive and to make available my thesis or dissertation in whole or in part in the University Libraries in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all proprietary rights, such as patent rights. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis or dissertation.en_US
dc.subjectEmbedded Optionsen_US
dc.subjectMunicipal Bondsen_US
dc.subjectOptimal Exerciseen_US
dc.subjectRefundingen_US
dc.titleOptimal Bond Refunding: Evidence From the Municipal Bond Marketen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US
dc.contributor.departmentFinanceen_US
dc.description.degreePh. D.en_US
thesis.degree.namePh. D.en_US
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen_US
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineFinanceen_US
dc.contributor.committeechairHansen, Robert S.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberChalmers, John M. R.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberChance, Donald M.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberKadlec, Gregory B.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberKumar, Ramanen_US
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-8497-93558/en_US
dc.date.sdate1997-05-02en_US
dc.date.rdate1998-09-05
dc.date.adate1997-09-05en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record