Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPark, Min-Yongen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T21:28:36Z
dc.date.available2014-03-14T21:28:36Z
dc.date.issued1989-08-28en_US
dc.identifier.otheretd-02062013-040020en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/40933
dc.description.abstract

Laboratory-obtained, manufacturer-supplied hearing protector attenuation ratings typically overestimate the workers' protection level In the workplace. In addition, several work-related in-field factors often degrade protection performance of the hearing protection devices (HPDs), posing the threat of underprotection for industrial workers. This research investigated the effects of HPD wearing time, subject activity movement, and HPD fitting procedure on the frequency-specific attenuation and user-rated comfort achieved with a popular foam cushion earmuff, two types of earplugs (user-molded foam and pre-molded, triple-flanged polymer), and an earmuff over foam earplug combination. Both attenuation and comfort data were collected from 40 naive but audiometrically normal subjects. Using a psychophysical real-earattenuation- at-threshoId-measurement procedure, attenuation data were obtained before, during, and after the activity movement tasks, which induced typical worker movements, so that the influence of wearing time and activity movement could be determined. Bipolar comfort rating data were also collected before and after the activity movement tasks, The results of statistical analyses indicated that achieved attenuation and user comfort significantly decreased over a two-hour wearing period and that training to achieve better fitting markedly improved protection, although these changes were device- and frequency-specific. Loss in frequency-specific attenuation over the wearing period was up to 6.3 dB for all HPDs except the foam plug, and attenuation Improvement due to training ranged from 4 to 14 dB for all HPDs except the earmuff at 1000 Hz and below. Almost no difference In achieved attenuation or comfort was found between the two activity (head/torso and temporomandibular) movements, but the earmuff tended to slip during highly kinematic head/torso movement. In general, out of the four different HPD configurations used in the study, the foam plug was very resilient to either type of activity movement but did benefit more than the other devices from the training for proper tilting; it was also perceived as the most acceptable and stable HPD by the subjects. In summary, the research illuminated the strong influence of in-field factors on HPD effectiveness.

en_US
dc.format.mediumBTDen_US
dc.publisherVirginia Techen_US
dc.relation.haspartLD5655.V855_1989.P375.pdfen_US
dc.subjectNoise controlen_US
dc.subject.lccLD5655.V855 1989.P375en_US
dc.titleLaboratory investigation of in-field influences on spectral noise attenuation and comfort of insert and circumaural hearing protectorsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentIndustrial Engineering and Operations Researchen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Scienceen_US
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Scienceen_US
thesis.degree.levelmastersen_US
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineIndustrial Engineering and Operations Researchen_US
dc.contributor.committeechairCasali, John Gordonen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberKroemer, Karl H. E.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberKemmerling, Paul T. Jr.en_US
dc.identifier.sourceurlhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-02062013-040020/en_US
dc.date.sdate2013-02-06en_US
dc.date.rdate2013-02-06
dc.date.adate2013-02-06en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record