Virginia Tech
    • Log in
    View Item 
    •   VTechWorks Home
    • Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine (VMCVM)
    • Department of Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology
    • Scholarly Works, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology
    • View Item
    •   VTechWorks Home
    • Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine (VMCVM)
    • Department of Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology
    • Scholarly Works, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Comparable growth of Tritrichomonas mobilensis in two commercially available culture media

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Main article (82.55Kb)
    Downloads: 327
    Date
    2002-10
    Author
    Boggild, A. K.
    Sundermann, C. A.
    Estridge, B. H.
    Lindsay, D. S.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The investigation reported herein was undertaken to determine which medium is more practical for the axenic laboratory culture of trichomonads. The growth of Tritrichomonas mobilensis was monitored in 2 different types of commercially available growth media. Although Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 medium is typically used as a mammalian cell culture medium, it was found to support the growth of trichomonads as well as the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) medium 745 under similar conditions. Environmental variables, such as temperature and pH, known to affect the success of trichomonad cultures were controlled. The mean generation times (MGTs) of T. mobilensis in the log phase of growth were 5.1 and 4.9 hr for RPMI 1640 and ATCC medium 745, respectively. A stationary phase of zero growth was reached more quickly in the ATCC medium 745 cultures, and in both media a phase of rapid attrition followed this period of static growth. In assessing the practicality of the media, total cell amplification, as well as factors such as cost, case of preparation, and storage capacity, were considered.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10919/49029
    Collections
    • Scholarly Works, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology [342]

    If you believe that any material in VTechWorks should be removed, please see our policy and procedure for Requesting that Material be Amended or Removed. All takedown requests will be promptly acknowledged and investigated.

    Virginia Tech | University Libraries | Contact Us
     

     

    VTechWorks

    AboutPoliciesHelp

    Browse

    All of VTechWorksCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Log inRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    If you believe that any material in VTechWorks should be removed, please see our policy and procedure for Requesting that Material be Amended or Removed. All takedown requests will be promptly acknowledged and investigated.

    Virginia Tech | University Libraries | Contact Us