Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJudson, Lauren Joyceen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-20T08:00:11Z
dc.date.available2014-09-20T08:00:11Z
dc.date.issued2014-09-19en_US
dc.identifier.othervt_gsexam:3667en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/50530
dc.description.abstractDuring periods of turmoil when ideological preferences between the federal branches of government fail to align, the relationship between the three quickly turns tumultuous. Electoral realignments especially have the potential to increase tension between the branches. When a new party replaces the 'old order' in both the legislature and the executive branches, the possibility for conflict emerges with the Court. Justices who make decisions based on old regime preferences of the party that had appointed them to the bench will likely clash with the new ideological preferences of the incoming party. In these circumstances, the president or Congress may seek to weaken the influence of the Court through court-curbing methods. One example Congress may utilize is changing the actual size of the Supreme The size of the Supreme Court has increased four times in United States history, and three out of the four alterations happened after an electoral realignment. Through analysis of Supreme Court cases, this thesis seeks to determine if, after an electoral realignment, holdings of the Court on issues of policy were more congruent with the new party in power after the change in composition as well to examine any change in individual vote tallies of the justices driven by the voting behavior of the newly appointed justice(s).en_US
dc.format.mediumETDen_US
dc.publisherVirginia Techen_US
dc.rightsThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. Some uses of this Item may be deemed fair and permitted by law even without permission from the rights holder(s), or the rights holder(s) may have licensed the work for use under certain conditions. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights holder(s).en_US
dc.subjectJudicial Politicsen_US
dc.subjectElectoral Realignmenten_US
dc.subjectAlteration to the Supreme Courten_US
dc.titleA Compliant Court: The Political Effects of the Addition of Judgeships to the United States Supreme Court Following Electoral Realignmentsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPolitical Scienceen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Artsen_US
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Artsen_US
thesis.degree.levelmastersen_US
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen_US
thesis.degree.disciplinePolitical Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.committeechairKelly, Jason P.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberHult, Karen M.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberMoore, Wayne D.en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record