Impacts of (un)civil discourse by organized groups on local governance in sustainable development projects
Files
TR Number
Date
2015-10-19
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Virginia Tech
Abstract
Anecdotal evidence in the media and from personal conversations suggests that inflammatory rhetoric in the collaborative governance setting is increasing, especially during public meetings about sustainable development projects. Planners, mediators, facilitators, and government officials are facing a shutting down of public deliberation by "new activists" who are engaging in public forums in very emotional and uncompromising ways. This dissertation is a direct examination of actions by new activists. It includes two case studies in Roanoke, Virginia, as well as a broader look at the inflammatory rhetoric and disruptions in local public meetings now occurring across the country.
Description
Keywords
sustainable development, intractable conflicts, civil discourse, new activists, local government, Tea Party, Agenda 21, wind energy, local planning, facilitation, deliberation, public discourse