Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFrank, Steven M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWasey, Jack O.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDwyer, Ian M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGokaslan, Ziya L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNess, Paul M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKebaish, Khaled M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-07T07:02:23Z
dc.date.available2015-11-07T07:02:23Z
dc.date.issued2014-07-05
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2014 Jul 05;9(1):50en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/63988
dc.description.abstractBackground A relatively new method of electrocautery, the radiofrequency bipolar hemostatic sealer (RBHS), uses saline-cooled delivery of energy, which seals blood vessels rather than burning them. We assessed the benefits of RBHS as a blood conservation strategy in adult patients undergoing multilevel spinal fusion surgery. Methods In a retrospective cohort study, we compared blood utilization in 36 patients undergoing multilevel spinal fusion surgery with RBHS (Aquamantys®, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) to that of a historical control group (n = 38) matched for variables related to blood loss. Transfusion-related costs were calculated by two methods. Results Patient characteristics in the two groups were similar. Intraoperatively, blood loss was 55% less in the RBHS group than in the control group (810 ± 530 vs. 1,800 ± 1,600 mL; p = 0.002), and over the entire hospital stay, red cell utilization was 51% less (2.4 ± 3.4 vs. 4.9 ± 4.5 units/patient; p = 0.01) and plasma use was 56% less (1.1 ± 2.4 vs. 2.5 ± 3.4 units/patient; p = 0.03) in the RBHS group. Platelet use was 0.1 ± 0.5 and 0.3 ± 0.6 units/patient in the RBHS and control groups, respectively (p = 0.07). The perioperative decrease in hemoglobin was less in the RBHS group than in the control group (−2.0 ± 2.2 vs. –3.2 ± 2.1 g/dL; p = 0.04), and hemoglobin at discharge was higher in the RBHS group (10.5 ± 1.4 vs. 9.7 ± 0.9 g/dL; p = 0.01). The estimated transfusion-related cost savings were $745/case by acquisition cost and approximately 3- to 5-fold this amount by activity-based cost. Conclusions The use of RBHS in patients undergoing multilevel spine fusion surgery can conserve blood, promote higher hemoglobin levels, and reduce transfusion-related costs.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleRadiofrequency bipolar hemostatic sealer reduces blood loss, transfusion requirements, and cost for patients undergoing multilevel spinal fusion surgery: a case control studyen_US
dc.typeArticle - Refereed
dc.date.updated2015-11-07T07:02:23Z
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewed
dc.rights.holderFrank et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentBiochemistryen_US
dc.title.serialJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-014-0050-2
dc.type.dcmitypeText


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International