Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRibot, J.C.
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-19T19:10:17Z
dc.date.available2016-04-19T19:10:17Z
dc.date.issued1999
dc.identifier1641
dc.identifier.citationAfrica: Journal of the International African Institute 69(1): 23-65
dc.identifier.issn0001-9720
dc.identifier.issn1750-0184
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/66237
dc.descriptionMetadata only record
dc.description.abstractColonial relations of political administration are being reproduced in the current era of participation and decentralisation. In natural resource management, participation and decentralisation are promoted on the basis that they can increase equity, yield greater efficiency, benefit the environment and contribute to rural development. Reaping these benefits is predicated on (1) the devolution of some real powers over natural resources to local populations, and (2) the existence of locally accountable authorities to whom those powers can be devolved. However, a limited set of highly circumscribed powers are being devolved to locally accountable authorities, and most local authorities to whom powers are being devolved are systematically structured to be upwardly accountable to the central state, rather than downwardly accountable to local populations. Many of the new laws being passed in the name of participation and decentralisation administer rather than enfranchise. The article examines the historical legal underpinnings of the powers and accountability of state-backed rural authorities (chiefs and rural councils), the authorities through which current natural resource management projects in Burkina Faso and in Mali represent local populations, and the decisions being devolved to local bodies in new natural resource management efforts. Without reform local interventions risk reproducing the inequities of their centralised political--administrative context. Rather than pitting the state against society by depicting the state as a negative force and society and non-state institutions as positive--as is done in many decentralisation and participatory efforts--this article suggests that representation through local government can be the basis of general and enduring participation by society in public affairs.
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherEdinburgh: Edinburgh University Press
dc.rightsCopyright 1999 by Edinburgh University Press
dc.subjectRural development
dc.subjectCommunity rights
dc.subjectCommunity institutions
dc.subjectSustainable development
dc.subjectCommunity management
dc.subjectSocial capital
dc.subjectGovernment policy
dc.subjectTropical zones
dc.subjectLeadership development
dc.subjectNatural resource management
dc.subjectEmpowerment
dc.subjectConservation
dc.subjectDecentralization
dc.subjectCommunity participation
dc.subjectCommunity development
dc.subjectLocal governance
dc.subjectCollective action
dc.subjectDevolution
dc.subjectAccountability
dc.subjectEcosystem Governance
dc.titleDecentralisation, participation and accountability in Sahelian Forestry: Legal instruments of political-administrative control
dc.typeAbstract
dc.type.dcmitypeText


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record