VTechWorks staff will be away for the Thanksgiving holiday beginning at noon on Wednesday, November 22, through Friday, November 24, and will not be replying to requests during this time. Thank you for your patience, and happy holidays!
When are payments for environmental services beneficial to the poor?
|dc.identifier.citation||ESA Working Paper No. 06-04|
|dc.description.abstract||The impact of payment for environmental services (PES) on poverty varies. Generally, PES is good for landowners and may negatively affect consumers if food demand is inelastic. Impacts also depend on the correlation between poverty and environmental amenities. If the richer farmers also provide the best environmental services (ES), then the poor farmers may lose. If there is negative correlation between ES and productivity, then the poorer landowners may gain from ES. The distribution of land matters. If smallholders depend on earnings from work on larger farms, then PES may affect them negatively. Program specifications also matter. Working land programs may have better distributional effects then PES for land diversion.|
|dc.publisher||Agricultural and Development Economics Division of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO - ESA)|
|dc.subject||Payments for environmental services|
|dc.subject||Economic modeling and analysis|
|dc.subject||Land use change|
|dc.title||When are payments for environmental services beneficial to the poor?|
|dc.description.notes||PES-1 (Payments for Environmental Services Associate Award)|