Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWunder, Sven
dc.contributor.authorAlbán, M.
dc.coverage.spatialPimampiro
dc.coverage.spatialEcuador
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-19T19:31:30Z
dc.date.available2016-04-19T19:31:30Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier3439
dc.identifier.citationEcological Economics 65(4): 685-698
dc.identifier.issn0921-8009
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/67548
dc.descriptionMetadata only record
dc.description.abstractThis article evaluates two established payment for environmental services (PES) schemes in Ecuador: the watershed protection program in Pimampiro and the PROFAFOR carbon sequestration program. The design, effectiveness, and impacts of these schemes are described and compared.
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.rightsCopyright 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
dc.subjectCarbon sequestration
dc.subjectPayments for environmental services
dc.subjectWatershed management
dc.subjectDecentralization
dc.subjectPES
dc.subjectWatershed protection
dc.subjectEcuador
dc.subjectProfafor
dc.subjectPimampiro
dc.subjectEcosystem Governance Watershed
dc.titleDecentralized payments for environmental services: The cases of Pimampiro and PROFAFOR in Ecuador
dc.typeAbstract
dc.description.notesPES-1 (Payments for Environmental Services Associate Award)
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.11.004
dc.type.dcmitypeText


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record