Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRockström, J.
dc.contributor.authorKaumbutho, P.
dc.contributor.authorMwalley, J.
dc.contributor.authorNzabi, A.W.
dc.contributor.authorTemesgen, M.
dc.contributor.authorMawenya, L.
dc.contributor.authorBarron, J.
dc.contributor.authorMutua, J.
dc.contributor.authorDamgaard-Larsen, S.
dc.coverage.spatialEthiopia
dc.coverage.spatialKenya
dc.coverage.spatialTanzania
dc.coverage.spatialZambia
dc.coverage.spatialAfrica
dc.coverage.temporal1999 - 2003
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-19T20:07:01Z
dc.date.available2016-04-19T20:07:01Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier4386
dc.identifier.citationSoil & Tillage Research 103(1): 23-32
dc.identifier.issn0167-1987
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/68692
dc.descriptionMetadata only record
dc.description.abstractConservation farming for smallholders has been primarily applied and researched in humid and sub-humid regions, where it has shown significant improvements in agricultural productivity. In these regions, water generally is not a limiting constraint on plant growth and CF methods emphasize no-till or minimal tillage and mulch cover. However, in semi-arid and arid regions, rainfall variability and scarcity are significant constraints to productivity, the potential for attaining substantial mulch coverage is low, and no-tillage contributes to a soil crust that further decreases water infiltration. This study develops a CF approach focused on non-inversion tillage methods, adapted to the needs of arid and semi-arid agriculture. Using a participatory approach with local farmers and extension agents, trials comparing CF and conventional farming, with and without fertilization, were conducted in Tanzania, Kenya, Ethiopia, and Zambia. Neither CF tillage methods nor fertilization alone showed a significant improvement, but CF methods with fertilization improved both yields and water productivity (amount of water required per unit of crop). The improvements of CF over conventional farming methods were especially pronounced in seasons with the lowest rainfall, suggesting that CF could be a valuable water harvesting method in water-scarce regions.
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.rightsCopyright 2009 Elsevier B.V.
dc.subjectParticipatory processes
dc.subjectConservation tillage
dc.subjectConservation agriculture
dc.subjectSemiarid zones
dc.subjectWater management
dc.subjectSurface water
dc.subjectArid zones
dc.subjectSmall-scale farming
dc.subjectRainfed agriculture
dc.subjectVulnerability and risk
dc.subjectTraditional farming
dc.subjectWater use
dc.subjectFertilization
dc.subjectConservation farming
dc.subjectNon-inversion tillage
dc.subjectSemi-arid africa
dc.subjectWater productivity
dc.subjectOn-farm experiments
dc.subjectCrop yields
dc.subjectSoil terracing
dc.subjectFarm/Enterprise Scale Field Scale
dc.titleConservation farming strategies in East and Southern Africa: Yields and rain water productivity from on-farm action research
dc.typeAbstract
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2008.09.013
dc.type.dcmitypeText


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record