Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHatfield, Jerry L.en
dc.contributor.authorPrueger, J. H.en
dc.coverage.spatialTexasen
dc.coverage.spatialIowaen
dc.coverage.spatialUnited Statesen
dc.coverage.temporal1987 - 1988en
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-19T20:07:10Zen
dc.date.available2016-04-19T20:07:10Zen
dc.date.issued1996en
dc.identifier4427en
dc.identifier.citationTheoretical and Applied Climatology 54(1-2): 47-59en
dc.identifier.issn0177-798Xen
dc.identifier.issn1434-4483en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/68729en
dc.descriptionMetadata only recorden
dc.description.abstractThis paper discusses two separate field studies of residue management, one a cotton crop in semi-arid Lubbock, Texas and the other a corn-soybean system in humid central Iowa. During the early vegetative stage, measures of plant growth, soil water, and microclimatic variables were taken, comparing stubble treatments with bare soil.en
dc.format.mimetypetext/plainen
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subjectHumid zonesen
dc.subjectSemiarid zonesen
dc.subjectSoil managementen
dc.subjectWateren
dc.subjectSoilen
dc.subjectConservation tillageen
dc.subjectCrop residuesen
dc.subjectSoil wateren
dc.subjectSoil temperatureen
dc.subjectMicroclimateen
dc.subjectField Scaleen
dc.titleMicroclimate effects of crop residues on biological processesen
dc.typeAbstracten
dc.rights.holderCopyright Springer-Verlag 1996en
dc.contributor.departmentSustainable Agriculture and Natural Resource Management (SANREM) Knowledgebaseen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/BF00863558en
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record