Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCassel, D.K.
dc.contributor.authorRaczkowski, C.W.
dc.contributor.authorDenton, H.P.
dc.coverage.spatialNorth Carolina
dc.coverage.spatialUnited States
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-19T20:07:24Z
dc.date.available2016-04-19T20:07:24Z
dc.date.issued1995
dc.identifier4490
dc.identifier.citationSoil Science Society of America Journal 59(5): 1436-1443
dc.identifier.issn0361-5995
dc.identifier.issn1435-0661
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/68788
dc.descriptionMetadata only record
dc.description.abstractThis study compares four tillage methods on a highly-erodible soil in the Piedmont of the southeastern United States. The tillage methods left varying levels of surface residue: no-till (NT) had 75-87% residue coverage; 38-27% for chisel plow (CP), and 1% residue cover with moldboard plow-disk (MP) treatment. Due to decreased crusting and runoff and increased infiltration for conservation tillage practices, yields increased. Average yields were 1.23 Mg ha:1 (MP); 2.97 Mg ha:1 (NT); 2.44 Mg ha:1 (CP); and 3.69 Mg ha:1 (In-row subsoiling; one year only)
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherMadison, WI: Soil Science Society of America
dc.relation.urihttp://soil.scijournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/59/5/1436
dc.rightsCopyright 1993 Soil Science Society of America
dc.subjectSoil
dc.subjectConservation agriculture
dc.subjectConservation tillage
dc.subjectTillage
dc.subjectCorn
dc.subjectSurface residues
dc.subjectYields
dc.subjectField Scale
dc.titleTillage effects on corn production and soil physical conditions
dc.typeAbstract
dc.type.dcmitypeText


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record