Show simple item record
dc.description.abstractScholars investigating civil defense generally focus on where it fell short of protecting the nation against attack. But civil defenders trained volunteers, organized state and local associations, educated citizens about fire and flood safety, and generally engaged the public to a greater degree than do today’s homeland security programs. Contemporary homeland security has drawn criticism for developing procedures that prioritize the terrorist threat and marginalize efforts to prepare for natural hazards such as fires and floods. Homeland security policies have also been shown to lack coordination and accountability. In contrast, the decentralized federalism of the early civil defense period offers advantages over the more heriarchical and centralized approach to today’s homeland security.en_US
dc.publisherJournal Of Policy History / Cambridge University Pressen_US
dc.titleThe Forgotten Lessons of Civil Defense for the Homeland Security Eraen_US
dc.typeArticle - Refereed
dc.description.notes< EDITORS: Gareth Davies, Oxford University, Special Issue Editor >< AUDIENCE: International >< REFEREED: Yes >< PUBLICAVAIL: Yes >< WEB_ADDRESS: >< USER_REFERENCE_CREATOR: Yes >< ACC_END: 2014-03-31 >< ACC_START: 2014-03-01 >< DTx_ACC: 03/2014 >< SUB_END: 2013-05-01 >< SUB_START: 2013-05-01 >< DTx_SUB: 01/05/2013 >< PUB_END: 2014-09-01 >< DTx_PUB: 01/09/2014 >en_US
dc.description.notesPublished (Publication status)en_US
dc.title.serialJournal of Policy History / Cambridge University Pressen_US
pubs.organisational-group/Virginia Tech
pubs.organisational-group/Virginia Tech/All T&R Faculty
pubs.organisational-group/Virginia Tech/Architecture and Urban Studies
pubs.organisational-group/Virginia Tech/Architecture and Urban Studies/CAUS T&R Faculty
pubs.organisational-group/Virginia Tech/Architecture and Urban Studies/School of Public and International Affairs

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record