Virginia Tech
    • Log in
    View Item 
    •   VTechWorks Home
    • Destination Areas (DAs) and Strategic Growth Areas (SGAs)
    • Destination Areas (DAs)
    • Destination Area: Adaptive Brain and Behavior (ABB)
    • View Item
    •   VTechWorks Home
    • Destination Areas (DAs) and Strategic Growth Areas (SGAs)
    • Destination Areas (DAs)
    • Destination Area: Adaptive Brain and Behavior (ABB)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Interoception drives increased rational decision-making in meditators playing the ultimatum game

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    MontagueInteroceptiondrives2011.pdf (1.012Mb)
    Downloads: 141
    Date
    2011-04-18
    Author
    Kirk, Ulrich
    Downar, Jonathan
    Montague, P. Read
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Human decision-making is often conceptualized as a competition between cognitive and emotional processes in the brain. Deviations from rational processes are believed to derive from inclusion of emotional factors in decision-making. Here, we investigate whether experienced Buddhist meditators are better equipped to regulate emotional processes compared with controls during economic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game. We show that meditators accept unfair offers on more than half of the trials, whereas controls only accept unfair offers on onequarter of the trials. By applying fMRI we show that controls recruit the anterior insula during unfair offers. Such responses are powerful predictors of rejecting offers in social interaction. By contrast, meditators display attenuated activity in high-level emotional representations of the anterior insula and increased activity in the low-level interoceptive representations of the posterior insula. In addition we show that a subset of control participants who play rationally (i.e., accepts >85% unfair offers) recruits the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex presumably reflecting increased cognitive demands, whereas rational meditators by contrast display elevated activity in the somatosensory cortex and posterior superior temporal cortex. In summary, when assessing unfairness in the Ultimatum Game, meditators activate a different network of brain areas compared with controls enabling them to uncouple negative emotional reactions from their behavior. These findings highlight the clinically and socially important possibility that sustained training in mindfulness meditation may impact distinct domains of human decision-making.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10919/78841
    Collections
    • Destination Area: Adaptive Brain and Behavior (ABB) [339]
    • Scholarly Works, Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC [303]

    If you believe that any material in VTechWorks should be removed, please see our policy and procedure for Requesting that Material be Amended or Removed. All takedown requests will be promptly acknowledged and investigated.

    Virginia Tech | University Libraries | Contact Us
     

     

    VTechWorks

    AboutPoliciesHelp

    Browse

    All of VTechWorksCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Log inRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    If you believe that any material in VTechWorks should be removed, please see our policy and procedure for Requesting that Material be Amended or Removed. All takedown requests will be promptly acknowledged and investigated.

    Virginia Tech | University Libraries | Contact Us