Virginia Tech
    • Log in
    View Item 
    •   VTechWorks Home
    • Destination Areas (DAs)
    • Strategic Growth Areas (SGAs)
    • Strategic Growth Area: Creativity and Innovation (C&I)
    • View Item
    •   VTechWorks Home
    • Destination Areas (DAs)
    • Strategic Growth Areas (SGAs)
    • Strategic Growth Area: Creativity and Innovation (C&I)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Comparative Dimensions of Disciplinary Culture

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    MartinDisciplinaryCulture2015.pdf (300.8Kb)
    Downloads: 330
    Date
    2015
    Author
    Martin, Thomas L.
    McNair, Lisa D.
    Paretti, Marie C.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Despite calls to promote creativity as “an indispensable quality for engineering” [1], the U.S. engineering educational system has been slow to develop pedagogies that successfully promote innovative behaviors. Engineers need more creativity and interdisciplinary fluency, but engineering instructors often struggle to provide such skills without sacrificing discipline-specific problem-solving skills. At the same time, engineering programs continue to struggle with attracting and retaining members of underrepresented populations—populations whose diversity could greatly contribute to innovation. Interestingly, the lack of diversity in engineering is often attributed to cultural traits of the field, which is often characterized as masculine, individualistic, and function-oriented. To address these issues, we have undertaken a 3-year study to investigate patterns of cultural traits in students across disciplines, and to build an actionable theory of engineering culture that can support pedagogies of inclusive and collaborative innovation as well as strategies for recruiting and retention efforts. In this paper, we present preliminary results from our survey in order to define how Hofstede’s dimensions of national culture map to 14 majors in a research university. Specifically, we are applying Hofstede’s original four dimensions of national business cultures (power distance, uncertainty avoidance, individualism, masculinity) [2] to academic disciplines to explain how students develop skills to operate within and across disciplinary boundaries. To do so, we are addressing the following research questions: 1. How do Hofstede’s dimensions of national cultures map to academic disciplines? 2. Do different majors have different disciplinary cultures according to Hofstede’s dimensions? This research purpose is to understand how students in different disciplines behave and perceive their majors. The information presented builds up on a pilot study where we applied Hofstede’s instrument with no major findings. However, we improved the survey based on the responses and expanded it outside engineering majors.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10919/80532
    Collections
    • Scholarly Works, Electrical and Computer Engineering [734]
    • Strategic Growth Area: Creativity and Innovation (C&I) [150]

    If you believe that any material in VTechWorks should be removed, please see our policy and procedure for Requesting that Material be Amended or Removed. All takedown requests will be promptly acknowledged and investigated.

    Virginia Tech | University Libraries | Contact Us
     

     

    VTechWorks

    AboutPoliciesHelp

    Browse

    All of VTechWorksCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Log inRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    If you believe that any material in VTechWorks should be removed, please see our policy and procedure for Requesting that Material be Amended or Removed. All takedown requests will be promptly acknowledged and investigated.

    Virginia Tech | University Libraries | Contact Us