Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVillanueva, Alexen_US
dc.contributor.authorVlachos, Pavlosen_US
dc.contributor.authorPriya, Shashanken_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-09T13:52:03Z
dc.date.available2018-10-09T13:52:03Z
dc.date.issued2014-06-06en_US
dc.identifier.othere98310en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/85283
dc.description.abstractThe development of a rowing jellyfish biomimetic robot termed as “Robojelly”, has led to the discovery of a passive flexible flap located between the flexion point and bell margin on the Aurelia aurita. A comparative analysis of biomimetic robots showed that the presence of a passive flexible flap results in a significant increase in the swimming performance. In this work we further investigate this concept by developing varying flap geometries and comparing their kinematics with A. aurita. It was shown that the animal flap kinematics can be replicated with high fidelity using a passive structure and a flap with curved and tapered geometry gave the most biomimetic performance. A method for identifying the flap location was established by utilizing the bell curvature and the variation of curvature as a function of time. Flaps of constant cross-section and varying lengths were incorporated on the Robojelly to conduct a systematic study of the starting vortex circulation. Circulation was quantified using velocity field measurements obtained from planar Time Resolved Digital Particle Image Velocimetry (TRDPIV). The starting vortex circulation was scaled using a varying orifice model and a pitching panel model. The varying orifice model which has been traditionally considered as the better representation of jellyfish propulsion did not appear to capture the scaling of the starting vortex. In contrast, the pitching panel representation appeared to better scale the governing flow physics and revealed a strong dependence on the flap kinematics and geometry. The results suggest that an alternative description should be considered for rowing jellyfish propulsion, using a pitching panel method instead of the traditional varying orifice model. Finally, the results show the importance of incorporating the entire bell geometry as a function of time in modeling rowing jellyfish propulsion.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherPLOSen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0en_US
dc.titleFlexible Margin Kinematics and Vortex Formation of Aurelia aurita and Robojellyen_US
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden_US
dc.description.versionPeer Revieweden_US
dc.title.serialPLOS ONEen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098310en_US
dc.identifier.volume9en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten_US
dc.identifier.pmid24905025en_US
dc.identifier.eissn1932-6203en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0