Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHughes, Joyce A.en
dc.description.abstractIn this article, the author critiques the use of "reverse discrimination" claims by White plaintiffs to challenge the hiring of Blacks in institutions of higher education. The author argues that "reverse discrimination" is a myth since no such claim is possible when one White candidate is selected over another; assumptions of inferiority are implicit where such a claim is made when a Black candidate is selected over a White candidate. In other words, allowing such a claim, even if ultimately unsuccessful, implies a presumption of superiority on the part of the White candidate. For this reason, the author argues that it is improper to assume that "reverse discrimination" occurs any time a Black candidate is chosen over a White candidate. If both are equally qualified, no such claim exists. The term "reverse discrimination" is not neutral in tone and therefore should not be treated as f it is neutral in application. The author concludes that institutions of higher education must not allow fears of unfounded "reverse discrimination" claims to prevent them from hiring, promoting, and granting tenure to Black faculty.en
dc.description.sponsorshipMichigan Journal of Race & Lawen
dc.publisherMichigan Journal of Race and Lawen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen
dc.subjectdiscrimination in higher educationen
dc.subjectrace in higher educationen
dc.subjectBlack facultyen
dc.subjectfaculty representationen
dc.title"Reverse Discrimination" and Higher Education Facultyen
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden
dc.identifier.volumeVolume 3: Issue 2en

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
License: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International