Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBeam, Shawn C.en
dc.contributor.authorMirsky, Stevenen
dc.contributor.authorCahoon, Charlieen
dc.contributor.authorHaak, David C.en
dc.contributor.authorFlessner, Michaelen
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-26T18:55:07Z
dc.date.available2020-02-26T18:55:07Z
dc.date.issued2019-08en
dc.identifier.issn0890-037Xen
dc.identifier.otherPII S0890037X19000460en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/97060
dc.description.abstractHerbicide resistance is a major problem in United States and global agriculture, driving farmers to consider other methods of weed control. One of these methods is harvest weed seed control (HWSC), which has been demonstrated to be effective in Australia. HWSC studies were conducted across Virginia in 2017 and 2018, targeting Italian ryegrass in continuous winter wheat as well as common ragweed and Palmer amaranth in continuous soybean. These studies assessed the impact of HWSC (via weed seed removal) on weed populations in the next year's crop compared with conventional harvest (weed seeds returned). HWSC reduced Italian ryegrass tillers compared with the conventional harvest at two locations in April (29% and 69%), but no difference was observed at a third location. At wheat harvest, HWSC at one location reduced Italian ryegrass seed heads (41 seed heads m(-2)) compared with conventional harvest (125 seed heads m(-2)). In soybean, before preplant herbicide applications and POST herbicide applications, HWSC reduced common ragweed densities by 22% and 26%, respectively, compared with the conventional harvest plots. By soybean harvest, no differences in common ragweed density, seed retention, or crop yield were observed, because of effectiveness of POST herbicides. No treatment differences were observed at any evaluation timing for Palmer amaranth, which is attributed to farmer weed management (i.e., effective herbicides) and low weed densities making any potential treatment differences difficult to detect. Across wheat and soybean, there were no differences observed in crop yield between treatments. Overall, HWSC was demonstrated to be a viable method to reduce Italian ryegrass and common ragweed populations.en
dc.description.sponsorshipVirginia Small Grains Board; Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station; Hatch Program of the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service Areawide program [58-8042-5-054]en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsCC0 1.0 Universalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/en
dc.subjectMichael Walshen
dc.subjectUniversity of Sydneyen
dc.subjectCommon ragweeden
dc.subjectAmbrosia artemisiifolia Len
dc.subjectAMBELen
dc.subjectItalian ryegrassen
dc.subjectLolium perenne Len
dc.subjectsspen
dc.subjectmultiflorum (Lamen
dc.subject) Husnot LOLMUen
dc.subjectPalmer amaranthen
dc.subjectAmaranthus palmeri Sen
dc.subjectWatson AMAPAen
dc.subjectsoybeanen
dc.subjectGlycine max (Len
dc.subject) Merren
dc.subjectwinter wheaten
dc.subjectTriticum aestivum Len
dc.subjectDensityen
dc.subjectintegrated weed managementen
dc.subjectseed retentionen
dc.subjectweed seed productionen
dc.titleHarvest weed seed control of Italian ryegrass [Lolium perenne L. ssp. multiflorum (Lam.) Husnot], common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.), and Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson)en
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Plant and Environmental Sciencesen_US
dc.description.notesThe authors acknowledge Paul Davis, Bill Shockley, Dee Claiborne, Spencer Wallace, Donald Anderson, Robert Proffitt, Cecil Shell, and Robbie Taylor for allowing this research to be conducted on their farms. The Virginia Small Grains Board, the Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station, the Hatch Program of the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service Areawide program (award 58-8042-5-054) provided partial funding for this research. No conflicts of interest have been declared.en
dc.title.serialWeed Technologyen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2019.46en
dc.identifier.volume33en
dc.identifier.issue4en
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten
dc.type.dcmitypeStillImageen
dc.description.adminPublic domain – authored by a U.S. government employeeen
dc.identifier.eissn1550-2740en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC0 1.0 Universal
License: CC0 1.0 Universal