Intervention Strategies Utilized in a Virginia Public High School with Improved Graduation Completion Index Values
| dc.contributor.author | Voelker, Amanda Carole | en |
| dc.contributor.committeechair | Cash, Carol S. | en |
| dc.contributor.committeemember | Price, Ted S. | en |
| dc.contributor.committeemember | Hughes, Kevin R. | en |
| dc.contributor.committeemember | Twiford, Travis W. | en |
| dc.contributor.department | Educational Leadership and Policy Studies | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-02-22T07:00:25Z | en |
| dc.date.available | 2017-02-22T07:00:25Z | en |
| dc.date.issued | 2015-08-31 | en |
| dc.description.abstract | With the recent implementation of the Graduation and Completion Index (GCI), schools in the Commonwealth of Virginia are charged with graduating students within a four year time frame. The purpose of this study was to investigate the intervention strategies implemented by a school receiving the status of 'warned' for falling below the GCI benchmark in the school year 2011-2012 and subsequently receiving 'meets benchmark' status for the next two school years, 2012-2013 and 2013-2014. This study sought to determine what support and interventions this school provided for students who successfully graduated from high school within the designated four year time frame. A review of previous research and findings demonstrated the need for further research in this area. The intervention strategies implemented at a school that received 'warning' status yet currently maintains 'meets benchmark' status could benefit other schools and students. Some of the identified intervention strategies were: a) in-school detention was used as an intervention strategy; b) calling home and home visits were used as intervention strategies; c) the four by four block schedule was used as an intervention strategy d); attendance, retention, and discipline influenced a student's decision to stay in school; e) intervention strategies for students must be supported at the elementary, middle, and high school levels; and f) additional academic support (Saturday school) was an effective strategy for meeting the GCI benchmark. Implications were that school leaders should: a) consider creating a team that meets frequently to address the needs of at-risk students; b) identify ways to engage parents and the community in meeting the needs of students who are at risk of dropping out; c) consider alternatives to out of school suspension; and d) consider the four by four block scheduling model to support on time graduation rates for students. | en |
| dc.description.degree | Ed. D. | en |
| dc.format.medium | ETD | en |
| dc.identifier.other | vt_gsexam:6108 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10919/75116 | en |
| dc.publisher | Virginia Tech | en |
| dc.rights | In Copyright | en |
| dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | en |
| dc.subject | Graduation Completion Index | en |
| dc.subject | intervention strategies | en |
| dc.subject | retention | en |
| dc.subject | attendance | en |
| dc.subject | discipline | en |
| dc.title | Intervention Strategies Utilized in a Virginia Public High School with Improved Graduation Completion Index Values | en |
| dc.type | Dissertation | en |
| thesis.degree.discipline | Educational Leadership and Policy Studies | en |
| thesis.degree.grantor | Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University | en |
| thesis.degree.level | doctoral | en |
| thesis.degree.name | Ed. D. | en |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1