Stability of Temperament Profiles in Early Childhood: A Latent Transition Analysis
| dc.contributor.author | Ermanni, Briana Leigh | en |
| dc.contributor.committeechair | Bell, Martha Ann | en |
| dc.contributor.committeemember | Gulseven, Zehra | en |
| dc.contributor.committeemember | Putnam, Samuel | en |
| dc.contributor.committeemember | Kim-Spoon, Jungmeen | en |
| dc.contributor.committeemember | Smith, Cynthia Lea | en |
| dc.contributor.department | Psychology | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-06-03T08:02:05Z | en |
| dc.date.available | 2025-06-03T08:02:05Z | en |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-06-02 | en |
| dc.description.abstract | From a variable-centered perspective, early childhood represents a developmental period where temperament is moderately stable. There is evidence, however, of change among individual traits, drawing attention to emerging gaps in our understanding of how temperamental stability translates to the person-level. Additionally, how and when children transition between profiles across early childhood, and how those transitions relate to socioemotional development, is still unclear, as these remain novel research questions within the temperament literature. Therefore, my dissertation project aimed to address the following goals: identify best-fitting structures of early childhood (3-years, 4-years, 6-years) temperament using Latent Profile Analysis; assess structural stability of and latent transitions between enumerated profiles using tests of measurement invariance in a latent transition framework; and investigate differences in middle childhood externalizing behaviors based on transition probabilities across early childhood. Four qualitatively similar temperament profiles were identified at all three ages, Negative/Average, Reserved, Approachable, and Surgent, but an unconditional transition model fit data best between 3-year and 4-years, and 4-years and 6-years, suggesting poor structural stability. Transition analyses using the unconditional models suggested fewer transitions between 3-years and 4-years compared to 4-years to 6-years. The Approachable profile displayed fewest transition patterns during younger ages, followed by the Surgent profile during older ages. Differential relations between 6-year profiles and 9-year externalizing behaviors are also reported. Together, observations elucidate how temperamental stability manifests from a person-centered perspective and raises the question of how important temperamental transitions may be for socioemotional development, above and beyond predictive power of distinct latent profiles. | en |
| dc.description.abstractgeneral | A person-centered approach to assessing children's temperament — or their natural ways of responding to novel scenarios and people — involves grouping children with similar patterns of temperament into different profiles based on a series of traits. In early childhood, individual temperament traits tend to show some consistency; they are also, however, susceptible to change based on maturation and experience. In turn, little is known about the consistency of temperament profiles in early childhood, when these traits are grouped together based on patterns. Further, how children transition (i.e., move) into different temperament profiles across early childhood, and how these shifts in profiles may influence later social and emotional development, is not well understood. My dissertation, therefore, aimed to explore the consistency of children's temperament profiles between ages 3, 4, and 6, how children's temperament profiles change between ages 3, 4, and 6, and whether those changes relate to behavior problems in middle childhood. Using a statistical method that groups children with similar temperament traits, I identified four types of temperament profiles at each age: Negative/Average, Reserved, Approachable, and Surgent. While these same four types appeared at each age based on qualitative assessments, the profile structures were not consistent such that children were not, on average, displaying similar levels of each trait over time within each profile. Additionally, children often changed profiles as they got older—especially between 4-years and 6-years. I also found that the temperament profile a child belonged to at 6-years was related to how many behavior problems they displayed by 9-years. Overall, these findings show that changes within and across temperament profiles in early childhood may play an important role in later social and emotional development. | en |
| dc.description.degree | Doctor of Philosophy | en |
| dc.format.medium | ETD | en |
| dc.identifier.other | vt_gsexam:44138 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10919/134981 | en |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.publisher | Virginia Tech | en |
| dc.rights | In Copyright | en |
| dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | en |
| dc.subject | temperament | en |
| dc.subject | person-centered | en |
| dc.subject | childhood | en |
| dc.subject | latent transition | en |
| dc.subject | stability | en |
| dc.subject | latent profile | en |
| dc.title | Stability of Temperament Profiles in Early Childhood: A Latent Transition Analysis | en |
| dc.type | Dissertation | en |
| thesis.degree.discipline | Psychology | en |
| thesis.degree.grantor | Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University | en |
| thesis.degree.level | doctoral | en |
| thesis.degree.name | Doctor of Philosophy | en |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1