Comparison of conjunctival pedicle flap to corneal fixation strength achieved by Tisseel® fibrin glue, ethyl cyanoacrylate adhesive, ReSure® hydrogel sealant, and conventional suturing with 8-0 VICRYL® ophthalmic suture

dc.contributor.authorVerHulst, Elodie M.en
dc.contributor.authorGalarza, Roxanne M. Rodriguezen
dc.contributor.authorHerring, Ian P.en
dc.contributor.authorRamos, Renata Vellosoen
dc.contributor.authorKemper, Andrew R.en
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-19T20:25:19Zen
dc.date.available2025-12-19T20:25:19Zen
dc.date.issued2025-03-01en
dc.description.abstractObjective To determine and compare the fixation strength of conjunctival pedicle flaps to cornea achieved via conventional ophthalmic suture and three different adhesive compounds. Animals Studied Ex vivo porcine globes. Procedures Following a 6 mm wide 500-micron-restricted depth lamellar keratectomy, conjunctival pedicle flaps were secured to the keratectomy site with either 8-0 VICRYL (R) suture or one of three adhesive products, including Tisseel (R) bioadhesive, ReSure (R) synthetic adhesive, or ethyl cyanoacrylate adhesive (n = 10 per surgical group). Adhesive application protocol varied by product based upon adhesive biocompatibility. Corneoconjunctival tissues were then harvested, clamped in a tensile testing device, and loaded at a rate of 1 mm/s under video surveillance until the point of failure. Peak load was determined for each test and used to compare fixation strength between samples. Results Forty conjunctival flaps were performed, with 6 omitted from evaluation due to dehiscence prior to tensile testing. Of the 34 flaps analyzed, 10 were secured with suture, 10 with cyanoacrylate, 8 with ReSure (R), and 6 with Tisseel (R). Flaps secured with suture withstood significantly higher applied tensile force compared with cyanoacrylate (p = .02474), ReSure (R) (p = .00000), and Tisseel (R) (p = .00002). Flaps secured with cyanoacrylate withstood significantly greater force than those secured with ReSure (R) and Tisseel (R) (p = .01194 and 0.01798, respectively). There was no significant difference in fixation strength between ReSure (R) and Tisseel (R) glue (p = .95675). Conclusions Conjunctival pedicle flap fixation using 8-0 VICRYL (R) suture fixation was able to withstand significantly greater maximum tensile force compared to ReSure (R), Tisseel (R), or cyanoacrylate adhesives. Fixation strength achieved with cyanoacrylate adhesive was significantly greater than that achieved with ReSure (R) or Tisseel (R).en
dc.description.sponsorshipVeterinary Memorial Funden
dc.description.versionPublished versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/vop.13197en
dc.identifier.eissn1463-5224en
dc.identifier.issn1463-5216en
dc.identifier.issue2en
dc.identifier.pmid38529836en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10919/140534en
dc.identifier.volume28en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherWileyen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subjectconjunctival flapen
dc.subjectcorneaen
dc.subjectcyanoacrylateen
dc.subjectfibrin adhesiveen
dc.subjectfixationen
dc.subjecthydrogelen
dc.titleComparison of conjunctival pedicle flap to corneal fixation strength achieved by Tisseel® fibrin glue, ethyl cyanoacrylate adhesive, ReSure® hydrogel sealant, and conventional suturing with 8-0 VICRYL® ophthalmic sutureen
dc.title.serialVeterinary Ophthalmologyen
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
VerHulstComparison.pdf
Size:
618.7 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version