Overcoming Present Bias in Engineering Design and Construction with Future Thinking and Generative AI
| dc.contributor.author | Aruon, Avinash | en |
| dc.contributor.committeechair | Shealy, Earl Wade | en |
| dc.contributor.committeemember | Gero, John S. | en |
| dc.contributor.committeemember | Grohs, Jacob Richard | en |
| dc.contributor.committeemember | Jazizadeh Karimi, Farrokh | en |
| dc.contributor.department | Civil and Environmental Engineering | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-26T08:00:19Z | en |
| dc.date.available | 2025-07-26T08:00:19Z | en |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-07-25 | en |
| dc.description.abstract | Present bias—the tendency to favor immediate gains over long-term benefits—can negatively affect design decisions in construction engineering. Designers often prioritize short-term economic gains that compromises the resilience of the asset, leading to increased cost of remediation in the future. This dissertation explores how mental visualization through future thinking and the use of generative AI tools can help reduce present bias during early-stage design tasks. Three experimental conditions were tested: present thinking (control), future thinking, and AI-assisted future thinking. Civil engineering students (n = 90) participated in constraints identification and concept design tasks for a campus redevelopment project, while their verbal responses and brain activity were recorded. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) was used to measure cognitive load. To analyze design narrative, qualitative coding and natural language processing (NLP) techniques such as semantic similarity and text network analysis were used. Results show that future thinking and AI assistance improved the quality and future orientation of design outputs. The AI-assisted group identified more climate-related risks, demonstrated higher alignment with futureproofing concepts, and showed more coherent design narratives. These improvements were achieved with reduced cognitive load. Notably, the influence of AI assistance extended beyond the phase in which it was used and enhanced performance in subsequent design stage. The findings support the role of AI as a cognitive support tool that can enhance design thinking, reduce cognitive load, and lead to more resilient and sustainable design outcomes in construction engineering. | en |
| dc.description.abstractgeneral | In construction projects, designers and engineers often focus on what is cheaper and easier to build in the present, without thinking enough about how their choices will affect the future. This can lead to problems later that are expensive or difficult to fix. Notably, when a building is not designed and constructed for the future uncertainties, such as extreme weather events, the cost of rectification and modification in the future is more than in the present and the cost is generally borne by the building or asset owner. This research looked at how we can help designers and engineers think more about the future when making decisions during conceptual design stage. We tested two ideas: intentionally prompting people to imagine future conditions (called future thinking) with and without the use of artificial intelligence (AI), and not prompting to think about the future conditions. Ninety engineering students took part in a design challenge where they had to come up with ideas for a campus redevelopment project. Some were not specifically asked to think about the future, some were guided to think about the future, and some got help from the AI to think about the future conditions. We found that the students who intentionally thought about the future with or AI help came up with better ideas for the long term. The group that used AI not only thought more about the future but also felt less mental stress while doing the work. Even when the AI was only used in the beginning, it helped people do better in later steps. This shows that AI can be a useful tool to support creative thinking and help designers make smarter choices that are better for the future. | en |
| dc.description.degree | Doctor of Philosophy | en |
| dc.format.medium | ETD | en |
| dc.identifier.other | vt_gsexam:44379 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10919/136917 | en |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.publisher | Virginia Tech | en |
| dc.rights | In Copyright | en |
| dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | en |
| dc.subject | design neurocognition | en |
| dc.subject | present bias | en |
| dc.subject | design futureproofing | en |
| dc.subject | human-AI co-design | en |
| dc.subject | distributed cognition | en |
| dc.title | Overcoming Present Bias in Engineering Design and Construction with Future Thinking and Generative AI | en |
| dc.type | Dissertation | en |
| thesis.degree.discipline | Civil Engineering | en |
| thesis.degree.grantor | Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University | en |
| thesis.degree.level | doctoral | en |
| thesis.degree.name | Doctor of Philosophy | en |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1