Microplastic burden in native (Cambarus appalachiensis) and non-native (Faxonius cristavarius) crayfish along semi-rural and urban streams in southwest Virginia, USA

dc.contributor.authorGray, Austinen
dc.contributor.authorMayer, Kathleenen
dc.contributor.authorGore, Beijaen
dc.contributor.authorGaesser, Meganen
dc.contributor.authorFerguson, Nathanen
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-10T16:01:42Zen
dc.date.available2025-11-10T16:01:42Zen
dc.date.issued2024-10-01en
dc.description.abstractOur comparative assessment is the first study to investigate microplastic body burden in native (Cambarus appalachiensis) and non-native (Faxonius cristavarius) crayfish along a semi-rural and urban stream across different seasons. Crayfish, sediment, and surface water were collected, processed, and characterized using mu Raman spectroscopy to compare microplastic polymer types and shapes across compartments. Average surface water concentrations were significantly higher in our urban stream compared to our semi-rural stream (17.3 +/- 2.4 particles/L and 9.9 +/- 1.3 particles/L, respectively; P = 0.015). Average sediment concentrations were similar between urban and semi-rural streams (140 +/- 14.5 particles/kg and 139 +/- 22.5 particles/kg, respectively; P = 0.957). Our findings showed a significant interactive effect of season, site, and nativity (i.e., species) regarding microplastic body burden in crayfish (P = 0.004). The smaller, non-native crayfish amassed more microplastic particles than the native crayfish (0.4-2.0 particles/g versus 0.4-0.8 particles/g, respectively). Fibers and fragments were the most common polymer shapes across compartments, with white and black being the dominant particle colors. Our study identified 13 plastic polymer types in crayfish and three in surface water and sediment; polypropylene was the most common polymer across compartments. This study provides evidence that crayfish body burden of microplastics can differ across species, seasons, and locations, highlighting the need for future studies to consider that sublethal impacts associated with microplastic body burden may vary by region and species.en
dc.description.sponsorshipGlobal Change Center at Virginia Techen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2024.119494en
dc.identifier.eissn1096-0953en
dc.identifier.issn0013-9351en
dc.identifier.pmid38936498en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10919/138927en
dc.identifier.volume258en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherAcademic Press – Elsevieren
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en
dc.subjectStreamen
dc.subjectCrayfishen
dc.subjectMicroplastic pollutionen
dc.subjectSedimenten
dc.subjectWateren
dc.subjectSeasonalityen
dc.titleMicroplastic burden in native (Cambarus appalachiensis) and non-native (Faxonius cristavarius) crayfish along semi-rural and urban streams in southwest Virginia, USAen
dc.title.serialEnvironmental Researchen
dc.typeArticle - Refereeden
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
GrayMicroplastic.pdf
Size:
6.24 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version