A study of the pattern of learning style characteristics for adult dependent decision-makers

dc.contributor.authorReynolds, Jimmieen
dc.contributor.committeechairGerstein, Martinen
dc.contributor.committeememberBoucouvalas, Marcieen
dc.contributor.committeememberLichtman, Marilyn V.en
dc.contributor.committeememberMcDaniels, Carl O.en
dc.contributor.committeememberNiles, Thomas R. IIen
dc.contributor.departmentCounseling and Student Personnelen
dc.date.accessioned2014-08-13T14:38:48Zen
dc.date.available2014-08-13T14:38:48Zen
dc.date.issued1988en
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to determine if there is a pattern of preferred learning style characteristics for adult "Dependent" decision-makers. Then, use those identified characteristics and their associated instructional/learning strategies to suggest instructional interventions for "Dependent“ decision-makers. One hundred and forty-four adult Community College students were used as subjects for this study. All subjects were enrolled in a career/life planning course, where measurement of their decision-making styles and learning style characteristics were obtained. Three instruments were used: (a) the Assessment of Career Decision Making (ACDM), (b) Productivity Environmental Preference Survey (PEPS), and, (c) Kolb's Learning-Style Inventory (LSI). Each subject was identified as belonging to one of five decision-making style groups: (a) Rational, N=25; (b) Intuitive, N=30; (c) Dependent, N=31; (d) Combination, N-23; and, (e) Unclassified, N=35. The "Dependent" decision-making group had a mean age of 33.42 years and was predominantly white (87%). Even though this group had more females (61.3%), this group was less dominated by females than the total sample (74.3%). Using the raw scores from each of the twenty learning-style characteristic elements of the PEPS, a one-way analysis of the variance (ANOVA) was used in analyzing the data for the five decision-making groups. A significance level of .05 was selected for the ANOVA. The same procedure was used to analyze the raw scores for the four learning modes of Kolb's LSI. The Fisher's LSD multiple comparison test was run on all PEPS and LSI elements that were identified by the ANOVA as showing a significant difference between groups. The summary of the PEPS data analysis indicated that four of the PEPS elements (Sound, Motivation, Persistent, and Responsible) are significantly lower for the "Dependent" decision-making group. None of the four LSI learning modes were shown to be significantly higher or lower for the "Dependent" decision-making group. The results of the study suggest that any model of instructional/learning strategies designed for "Dependent" decision-makers should take into account the four PEPS elements of (a) Sound, (b) Motivation, (c) Persistent, and (d) Responsible. Instructional/learning strategies used to assist "Dependent" decision-makers should stress motivational factors such as a supportive learning environment. Special emphasis should be placed on ways to help "Dependent" decision-makers become more persistent and responsible about their own learning.en
dc.description.adminincomplete_metadataen
dc.description.degreeEd. D.en
dc.format.extentx, 137 leavesen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/49930en
dc.publisherVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
dc.relation.isformatofOCLC# 19284942en
dc.rightsIn Copyrighten
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.subject.lccLD5655.V856 1988.R496en
dc.subject.lcshDecision makingen
dc.subject.lcshLearningen
dc.subject.lcshCareer developmenten
dc.titleA study of the pattern of learning style characteristics for adult dependent decision-makersen
dc.typeDissertationen
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten
thesis.degree.disciplineCounseling and Student Personnelen
thesis.degree.grantorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universityen
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen
thesis.degree.nameEd. D.en

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
LD5655.V856_1988.R496.pdf
Size:
4.56 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: