<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><front xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.0/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1.xsd"><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ISRN</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>ISRN Education</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2090-8652</issn><publisher><publisher-name>International Scholarly Research Network</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="other">617137</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5402/2012/617137</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">617137</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Perceptions and Practices: A Survey of Professional Engineers and Architects</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" id="U18282170" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Cunningham</surname><given-names>Don</given-names></name><email>dacunning@radford.edu</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="I1"><sup>1,2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="I2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="U69395048"><name><surname>Stewart</surname><given-names>Jill</given-names></name><email>mjstewart@radford.edu</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="I3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="Academic Editor" id="U95487272"><name><surname>Betts</surname><given-names>T. A.</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="Academic Editor" id="U92460192"><name><surname>Roecker</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="I1"><sup>1</sup><addr-line>English Department</addr-line><addr-line>Radford University Radford, VA 24141</addr-line><country>USA</country><ext-link ext-link-type="domain-name">radford.edu</ext-link></aff><aff id="I2"><sup>2</sup><addr-line>Language and Culture Institute, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061</addr-line><country>USA</country><ext-link ext-link-type="domain-name">vt.edu</ext-link></aff><aff id="I3"><sup>3</sup><addr-line>Department of Math and Statistics</addr-line><addr-line>Radford University, Radford, VA 24141</addr-line><country>USA</country><ext-link ext-link-type="domain-name">radford.edu</ext-link></aff><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2012</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="archival-date"><day>28</day><month>3</month><year>2012</year></pub-date><volume>2012</volume><history><date date-type="received"><day>07</day><month>12</month><year>2011</year></date><date date-type="accepted"><day>10</day><month>01</month><year>2012</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-year>2012</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Copyright © 2012 Don Cunningham and Jill Stewart.</copyright-holder><license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the <ext-link xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License</ext-link>, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>This descriptive cross-sectional research study examines perceptions of time spent by architects and professional engineers on reading, writing, and evaluating various information products, as well as their perspectives of specific quality characteristics and the relative significance in meeting work goals. Professional engineers and architects were surveyed at seminars held at eight locations in seven states. Descriptive statistics were then used to investigate perceptions and relationships. Findings indicate architects and professional engineers spend the most amount of time reading correspondence and the least amount of time reading management reports. Respondents considered correspondence to be the most important reading activity. Participants also spend the most amount of time writing correspondence, closely followed by nearly equal time spent writing and editing technical reports and proposals. Finally, participants rated organization, comprehensiveness, and accuracy as the most important aspects while indicating mechanical issues such as grammar and spelling as the least important aspects of technical documents.</p></abstract><counts><ref-count count="17"/><page-count count="10"/></counts></article-meta></front>
