Hollinger, Keith H.2014-03-142014-03-142011-05-02etd-05172011-235932http://hdl.handle.net/10919/37820The concept of peacebuilding holds enormous importance for international relations, particularly in regions facing impending violent conflict and those recovering from such conflict. However, in order for peacebuilding to be a viable alternative to traditional peace operations, scholars and practitioners need to have a shared understanding of what peacebuilding is and what goals it hopes to achieve, in addition to fluid strategies for implementation. This dissertation seeks to identify strategies for building sustainable peace through sustainable community development and democratization. Using a qualitative metasynthesis of five ethnographies conducted in Chiapas Mexico, this dissertation develops mid-range theories, or strategies, for building peace in Chiapas and in regions experiencing low-intensity conflict more generally. These strategies are based upon the development of Pluriethnic collective governance at the local level in regions that are experiencing low-intensity conflict related to indigenous communities.In CopyrightPeacebuildingMestizajeZapatismobottom-up peacepeace operationspeacekeepingsustainable peacecounterinsurgency warfarelow intensity conflictnew warsrebellionconflict analysisconflict preventiondisaster managementChiapasMexicoEZLNZapatistasIndígenasindigenouscampesinospeasantseconomic developmentcommunity resilienceresilient communitiessustainable developmentbottom-up developmentcollective developmentcollective democracydemocratizationsustainable democracyindigenismoAlternative Pathways to Peace and Development in Rural Chiapas, MexicoDissertationhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-05172011-235932/