Winnard, Thomas Johan2021-05-202021-05-202021-05-19vt_gsexam:30565http://hdl.handle.net/10919/103387Technological advances require novel solutions for contactless energy transfer. Many engineering applications require unique approaches to power electrical components without using physical wires. In the past decade, awareness of the need to wirelessly power electrical components spawned many forays into the field of wireless power transfer (WPT). WPT techniques include capacitive energy transfer, electromagnetic inductive power transfer, electromagnetic radiative power transfer, electrostatic induction, and acoustic energy transfer. Acoustic energy transfer (AET) has many advantages over other methods. These advantages include lower operating frequency, shorter wavelengths enabling the use of smaller sized receiver and transmitter, extended transmitter-to-receiver distance therefore more manageable design constraints, achieving lower attenuation, higher penetration depth, and no electromagnetic losses. Most AET systems operate in the ultrasonic frequency range and are more commonly referred to as ultrasonic acoustic energy transfer (UAET) systems. Through-wall UAET systems are constructed of a transmitter bonded to a transmission elastic layer, which in turn is bonded to a receiver. The transmitter and receiver layers are constructed of a piezoelectric material. Piezoelectric materials behave according to the piezoelectric effect, which is when a material generates an electric charge in response to mechanical strain. The transmitter utilizes the reverse of the piezoelectric effect. A sinusoidal input voltage is applied to the transmitter, inducing vibrations in the transmitter. The vibration-induced acoustic waves emanating from the transmitter travel through the initial bonding layer, the transmission layer, and the final bonding layer to the receiver. In turn, the acoustic waves cause the receiver to deform and undergo strain. This induces a flow of charge in the receiver, which is an electric current. The receiver feeds current to a resistive load. In this manner, energy is acoustically transferred between two transducers without wires. The performance of UAET systems can be evaluated based on power transfer efficiency, voltage magnification, and input admittance. UAET systems require extensive modeling before experimental assembly can be attempted. The analytical models of UAET are either based on the mechanics of the constitutive relations of piezoelectricity and solid mechanics or using equivalent circuit methods. The equivalent circuit method approximates the physics of the UAET system with electrical assumptions. The mechanics-based method is the most comprehensive description of the physics of all the intermediate layers in a UAET system. The mechanics-based method has been based on the assumption that the UAET system is operated in the thickness mode of vibration, i.e., piston-like vibration mode where the transmitter and receiver disks vibrate only in the thickness direction. This poses an issue for disks with aspect ratios between 0.1 and 20 because the piezoelectric transducers vibrate in both the radial and thickness modes. In addition to this assumption, most of the works on UAET models only have accounted for the piezoelectric and transmission layers. The effects of the bonding layers were not considered. Bonding the piezoelectric layers to the transmission layer introduces epoxy material with mechanical properties that are not accounted for. The epoxy layers are extra barriers to the transmission that introduce attenuation and alter the vibrational and acoustical behaviors of the UAET system. Investigations into UAET commonly focus on metal through-wall applications. Alternate transmission layer materials are not investigated and the impact of varying mechanical properties on the performance of a through-wall UAET system has not been comprehensively studied. Even with the metal transmission layers, the impact of the metal thickness has not been extensively investigated thoroughly. This work addresses the issues of the thickness-mode assumption in UAET modeling, the effects of epoxy layers, the impacts of the metal layer geometry, and the performance of UAET systems with alternate transmission layer materials. Particularly, (1) we showed that the thickness-mode assumption, that has been used in the UAET modeling leads to inaccurate results. (2) We modified the available acoustic electro- elastic theoretical modeling to include the effects of radial modes as well as the epoxy bonding layers. (3) We showed that the geometry of the elastic/metal layer requires optimization for peak system efficiency. (4) The results show that using alternate transmission layer materials impacts the performance of UAET systems. The results of this work were investigated using an improved 5-layer analytical model and finite element modeling in COMSOL Multiphysics.ETDIn Copyrightthrough-wallUAETultrasonic acoustic energy transferparametric studytheoreticalpiezoelectricwireless power transfermultiphysicsvibrationsacoustic wavesvibrational modesThesis