Renner, Kristen E.Williams, D. S. BlaiseQueen, Robin M.2019-01-242019-01-242019-01-11Renner, K.E.; Williams, D.B.; Queen, R.M. The Reliability and Validity of the Loadsol® under Various Walking and Running Conditions. Sensors 2019, 19, 265.http://hdl.handle.net/10919/86870The assessment of loading during walking and running has historically been limited to data collection in laboratory settings or with devices that require a computer connection. This study aims to determine if the loadsol<sup>&reg;</sup>&mdash;a single sensor wireless insole&mdash;is a valid and reliable method of assessing force. Thirty (17 male and 13 female) recreationally active individuals were recruited for a two visit study where they walked (1.3 m/s) and ran (3.0 and 3.5 m/s) at a 0%, 10% incline, and 10% decline, with the visits approximately one week apart. Ground reaction force data was collected on an instrumented treadmill (1440 Hz) and with the loadsol<sup>&reg;</sup> (100 Hz). Ten individuals completed the day 1 protocol with a newer 200 Hz loadsol<sup>&reg;</sup>. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC3,k) were used to assess validity and reliability and Bland&ndash;Altman plots were generated to better understand loadsol<sup>&reg;</sup> validity. Across conditions, the peak force ICCs ranged from 0.78 to 0.97, which increased to 0.84&ndash;0.99 with the 200 Hz insoles. Similarly, the loading rate ICCs improved from 0.61 to 0.97 to 0.80&ndash;0.96 and impulse improved from 0.61 to 0.97 to 0.90&ndash;0.97. The 200 Hz insoles may be needed for loading rate and impulse in running. For both walking and running, the loadsol<sup>&reg;</sup> has excellent between-day reliability (&gt;0.76).application/pdfenCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalgait mechanicsground reaction forcereliabilityBland–Altmanin-shoeThe Reliability and Validity of the Loadsol® under Various Walking and Running ConditionsArticle - Refereed2019-01-24Sensorshttps://doi.org/10.3390/s19020265